Kastaun Sabrina, Viechtbauer Wolfgang, Leve Verena, Hildebrandt Jaqueline, Funke Christian, Klosterhalfen Stephanie, Lubisch Diana, Reddemann Olaf, Raupach Tobias, Wilm Stefan, Kotz Daniel
Institute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dept of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Jul 26;7(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00224-2021. eCollection 2021 Jul.
We developed a 3.5-h training for general practitioners (GPs) in delivering brief stop-smoking advice according to different methods (ABC, 5As). In a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial our training proved effective in increasing GP-delivered rates of such advice (from 13% to 33%). In this follow-up analysis we examined the effect of the training and compared ABC 5As on patient-reported quit attempts and point prevalence abstinence at weeks 4, 12 and 26 following GP consultation. Follow-up data were collected in 1937 smoking patients - independently of the receipt of GP advice - recruited before or after the training of 69 GPs. At week 26, ∼70% of the patients were lost to follow-up. All 1937 patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis; missing outcome data were imputed. Quit attempts and abstinence rates did not differ significantly from pre- to post-training or between patients from the ABC the 5As group. However, ancillary analyses showed that patients who received GP advice compared to those who did not had two times higher odds of reporting a quit attempt at all follow-ups and abstinence at week 26. We reported that our training increases GP-delivered rates of stop-smoking advice, and the present analysis confirms that advice is associated with increased quit attempts and abstinence rates in patients. However, our training did not further improve these rates, which might be related to patients' loss to follow-up or to contextual factors, access to free evidence-based cessation treatment, which can hamper the transfer of GPs' advice into patients' behaviour change.
我们为全科医生(GP)开发了一项为期3.5小时的培训,内容是根据不同方法(ABC、5A法)提供简短的戒烟建议。在一项实用的整群随机对照试验中,我们的培训被证明能有效提高全科医生提供此类建议的比例(从13%提高到33%)。在这项随访分析中,我们研究了培训的效果,并比较了ABC法和5A法对患者报告的戒烟尝试以及全科医生咨询后第4周、12周和26周的点患病率戒烟情况的影响。在69名全科医生接受培训之前或之后招募了1937名吸烟患者收集随访数据,这些患者的随访与是否接受全科医生的建议无关。在第26周时,约70%的患者失访。所有1937名患者都纳入了意向性分析;缺失的结局数据进行了估算。培训前后以及ABC组和5A组患者之间的戒烟尝试和戒烟率没有显著差异。然而,辅助分析表明,与未接受全科医生建议的患者相比,接受建议的患者在所有随访中报告戒烟尝试的几率高出两倍,在第26周时戒烟的几率也高出两倍。我们报告称,我们的培训提高了全科医生提供戒烟建议的比例,目前的分析证实,建议与患者增加戒烟尝试和戒烟率相关。然而,我们的培训并没有进一步提高这些比例,这可能与患者失访或背景因素、获得免费的循证戒烟治疗的机会有关,这些因素可能会阻碍全科医生的建议转化为患者的行为改变。