• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以牙还牙的“我”:煽动性和回应性无礼行为的系统评价和荟萃分析。

An "I" for an "I": A systematic review and meta-analysis of instigated and reciprocal incivility.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Occup Health Psychol. 2022 Feb;27(1):7-21. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000293. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1037/ocp0000293
PMID:34323554
Abstract

Incivility and its negative impacts on individuals, teams, and organizations have been widely studied in workplace contexts, but the literature lacks a comprehensive understanding of incivility from the instigator's perspective. This meta-analysis of instigated incivility included 35,344 workers from 76 independent samples. Results showed that instigated incivility was related to several correlates including psychological ill-being, ρ = .36, and well-being, ρ = -.17; physical well-being, ρ = -.25; personal dispositions that are risk factors, ρ = .47, and preventative factors, ρ = -.34; negative, ρ = .28, and positive, ρ = -.33, job attitudes; positive team characteristics, ρ = -.28; job demands, ρ = .10; and experienced, ρ = .61, and observed, ρ = .58, incivility. Moderator analyses showed that the relationship between experienced and instigated incivility was weaker for older participants and under conditions of greater job control and work-group civility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

无礼行为及其对个人、团队和组织的负面影响在工作场所环境中已经得到了广泛研究,但文献缺乏对挑衅性无礼行为的全面理解。本项针对挑衅性无礼行为的元分析包括了来自 76 个独立样本的 35344 名员工。结果表明,挑衅性无礼行为与一些相关因素有关,包括心理不适(ρ=.36)和幸福感(ρ=-.17);身体健康(ρ=-.25);是风险因素(ρ=.47)和预防因素(ρ=-.34)的个人倾向;消极的(ρ=.28)和积极的(ρ=-.33)工作态度;积极的团队特征(ρ=-.28);工作要求(ρ=.10);经历过的(ρ=.61)和观察到的(ρ=.58)无礼行为。调节分析表明,对于年龄较大的参与者和在工作控制程度较大以及工作群体文明程度较高的情况下,经历过的无礼行为与挑衅性无礼行为之间的关系较弱。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
An "I" for an "I": A systematic review and meta-analysis of instigated and reciprocal incivility.以牙还牙的“我”:煽动性和回应性无礼行为的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2022 Feb;27(1):7-21. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000293. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
2
Beyond targets and instigators: Examining workplace incivility in dyads and the moderating role of perceived incivility norms.超越目标和始作俑者:在对偶中考察工作场所的粗野行为,以及感知到的粗野行为规范的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Aug;107(8):1288-1302. doi: 10.1037/apl0000910. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
3
A meta-analysis of experienced incivility and its correlates: Exploring the dual path model of experienced workplace incivility.一项关于体验不文明行为及其相关性的元分析:探索体验职场不文明行为的双重路径模型。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2022 Jun;27(3):317-338. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000326. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Models of Workplace Incivility: The Relationships to Instigated Incivility and Negative Outcomes.职场不文明行为模式:与引发的不文明行为及负面结果的关系
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:920239. doi: 10.1155/2015/920239. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
5
Retreating or repairing? Examining the alternate linkages between daily partner-instigated incivility at home and helping at work.逃避还是修复?检验日常伴侣在家中不礼貌行为与工作中帮助行为之间的交替联系。
J Appl Psychol. 2023 May;108(5):826-849. doi: 10.1037/apl0001048. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
6
Experienced incivility in the workplace: A meta-analytical review of its construct validity and nomological network.工作场所不文明行为:一项关于其构念效度和关联网络的元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Feb;107(2):193-220. doi: 10.1037/apl0000870. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Family-to-work conflict and instigated incivility: The role of negative affect and family supportive supervisor behaviours.家庭-工作冲突和煽动不文明行为:负面情绪和支持性主管行为的作用。
Stress Health. 2024 Feb;40(1):e3282. doi: 10.1002/smi.3282. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
8
Factors contributing to the perpetration of workplace incivility: the importance of organizational aspects and experiencing incivility from others.导致职场不文明行为发生的因素:组织层面的重要性以及遭受他人的不文明行为
Work Stress. 2016 Apr 2;30(2):115-131. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2016.1175524. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
9
How do humble people mitigate group incivility? An examination of the social oil hypothesis of collective humility.谦逊的人如何缓解群体不文明行为?对集体谦逊的社会润滑油假设的检验。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2021 Oct;26(5):361-373. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000244. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Perceived overqualification and experiences of incivility: Can task i-deals help or hurt?感知过度资格和不文明行为体验:任务 i-协议能带来帮助还是伤害?
J Occup Health Psychol. 2022 Feb;27(1):89-103. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000304. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Incivility, bullying, and poor health and well-being among students: a Swedish national study in higher education institutions.大学生中的不文明行为、欺凌行为和不良健康与福祉:瑞典高等教育机构的一项全国性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;12:1400520. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1400520. eCollection 2024.
2
Explaining the negative effects of workplace incivility on family lives: a moderated mediation model of surface acting and resource-providing variables.解释职场不文明行为对家庭生活的负面影响:一个关于表层行为和资源提供变量的有调节的中介模型
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 16;15:1409144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1409144. eCollection 2024.
3
What should I say? Testing ways to reduce fear and increase disclosure of incivility in reference checks.
我该怎么说呢?测试减少恐惧和增加不文明行为在参考检查中的披露的方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0290011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290011. eCollection 2023.
4
Coping with Workplace Incivility in Hospital Teams: How Does Team Mindfulness Influence Prevention- and Promotion-Focused Emotional Coping?应对医院团队中的职场粗言秽语:团队正念如何影响预防和促进焦点情绪应对?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 3;19(23):16209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316209.
5
Nurse leadership in promoting and supporting civility in health care settings: A scoping review.护士在促进和支持医疗环境文明方面的领导作用:范围综述。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Nov;30(8):4221-4233. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13883. Epub 2022 Nov 15.