Zhuang Zixuan, Zhang Yang, Wei Mingtian, Yang Xuyang, Wang Ziqiang
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 13;11:709070. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.709070. eCollection 2021.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based lymph node staging remains a significant challenge in the treatment of rectal cancer. Pretreatment evaluation of lymph node metastasis guides the formulation of treatment plans. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI in lymph node staging using various morphological criteria. METHODS: A systematic search of the EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases was performed. Original articles published between 2000 and January 2021 that used MRI for lymph node staging in rectal cancer were eligible. The included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate random-effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of preoperative MRI for the lymph node stage were 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.77), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80), and 7.85 (95% CI, 5.78-10.66), respectively. Criteria for positive mesorectal lymph node metastasis included (A) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm, (B) morphological standard, including an irregular border and mixed-signal intensity within the lymph node, (C) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm with the morphological standard, (D) a short-axis diameter of 8 mm with the morphological standard, and (E) a short-axis diameter of 10 mm with the morphological standard. The pooled sensitivity/specificity for these criteria were 75%/64%, 81%/67%, 74%/79%, 72%/66%, and 62%/91%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the criteria in sensitivity/specificity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values of the fitted summary ROC indicated a diagnostic accuracy rate of 0.75-0.81. CONCLUSION: MRI scans have minimal accuracy as a reference index for pretreatment staging of various lymph node staging criteria in rectal cancer. Multiple types of evidence should be used in clinical decision-making.
背景:基于磁共振成像(MRI)的淋巴结分期仍是直肠癌治疗中的一项重大挑战。术前对淋巴结转移情况进行评估有助于制定治疗方案。本系统评价旨在评估MRI在采用各种形态学标准进行淋巴结分期时的诊断性能。 方法:对EMBASE、Medline和Cochrane数据库进行系统检索。纳入2000年至2021年1月期间发表的使用MRI对直肠癌进行淋巴结分期的原始文章。使用QUADAS - 2工具对纳入研究进行评估。采用双变量随机效应模型对诊断试验准确性进行荟萃分析。 结果:37项研究符合本荟萃分析的要求。术前MRI对淋巴结分期的合并敏感度、特异度和诊断比值比分别为0.73(95%置信区间[CI],0.68 - 0.77)、0.74(95%CI,0.68 - 0.80)和7.85(95%CI,5.78 - 10.66)。直肠系膜淋巴结转移阳性标准包括:(A)短轴直径5mm;(B)形态学标准,包括边界不规则和淋巴结内信号强度不均匀;(C)短轴直径5mm且符合形态学标准;(D)短轴直径8mm且符合形态学标准;(E)短轴直径10mm且符合形态学标准。这些标准的合并敏感度/特异度分别为75%/64%、81%/67%、74%/79%、72%/66%和62%/91%。各标准在敏感度/特异度方面无显著差异。拟合汇总ROC曲线的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积值表明诊断准确率为0.75 - 0.81。 结论:作为直肠癌各种淋巴结分期标准术前分期的参考指标,MRI扫描的准确性有限。临床决策应综合多种证据。
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018-7-25
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019-4-17
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021-2-23
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025-6-24
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-6-10
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025-2-16
Invest Radiol. 2021-1
Cancer Radiother. 2020-8
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019-4-17