文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

磁共振成像评估直肠癌中各种淋巴结分期标准的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zhuang Zixuan, Zhang Yang, Wei Mingtian, Yang Xuyang, Wang Ziqiang

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 13;11:709070. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.709070. eCollection 2021.


DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.709070
PMID:34327144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8315047/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based lymph node staging remains a significant challenge in the treatment of rectal cancer. Pretreatment evaluation of lymph node metastasis guides the formulation of treatment plans. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI in lymph node staging using various morphological criteria. METHODS: A systematic search of the EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases was performed. Original articles published between 2000 and January 2021 that used MRI for lymph node staging in rectal cancer were eligible. The included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate random-effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of preoperative MRI for the lymph node stage were 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.77), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80), and 7.85 (95% CI, 5.78-10.66), respectively. Criteria for positive mesorectal lymph node metastasis included (A) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm, (B) morphological standard, including an irregular border and mixed-signal intensity within the lymph node, (C) a short-axis diameter of 5 mm with the morphological standard, (D) a short-axis diameter of 8 mm with the morphological standard, and (E) a short-axis diameter of 10 mm with the morphological standard. The pooled sensitivity/specificity for these criteria were 75%/64%, 81%/67%, 74%/79%, 72%/66%, and 62%/91%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the criteria in sensitivity/specificity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values of the fitted summary ROC indicated a diagnostic accuracy rate of 0.75-0.81. CONCLUSION: MRI scans have minimal accuracy as a reference index for pretreatment staging of various lymph node staging criteria in rectal cancer. Multiple types of evidence should be used in clinical decision-making.

摘要

背景:基于磁共振成像(MRI)的淋巴结分期仍是直肠癌治疗中的一项重大挑战。术前对淋巴结转移情况进行评估有助于制定治疗方案。本系统评价旨在评估MRI在采用各种形态学标准进行淋巴结分期时的诊断性能。 方法:对EMBASE、Medline和Cochrane数据库进行系统检索。纳入2000年至2021年1月期间发表的使用MRI对直肠癌进行淋巴结分期的原始文章。使用QUADAS - 2工具对纳入研究进行评估。采用双变量随机效应模型对诊断试验准确性进行荟萃分析。 结果:37项研究符合本荟萃分析的要求。术前MRI对淋巴结分期的合并敏感度、特异度和诊断比值比分别为0.73(95%置信区间[CI],0.68 - 0.77)、0.74(95%CI,0.68 - 0.80)和7.85(95%CI,5.78 - 10.66)。直肠系膜淋巴结转移阳性标准包括:(A)短轴直径5mm;(B)形态学标准,包括边界不规则和淋巴结内信号强度不均匀;(C)短轴直径5mm且符合形态学标准;(D)短轴直径8mm且符合形态学标准;(E)短轴直径10mm且符合形态学标准。这些标准的合并敏感度/特异度分别为75%/64%、81%/67%、74%/79%、72%/66%和62%/91%。各标准在敏感度/特异度方面无显著差异。拟合汇总ROC曲线的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积值表明诊断准确率为0.75 - 0.81。 结论:作为直肠癌各种淋巴结分期标准术前分期的参考指标,MRI扫描的准确性有限。临床决策应综合多种证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/b341e8757464/fonc-11-709070-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/5dda6d77d966/fonc-11-709070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/b7733601b201/fonc-11-709070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/e5039e778c83/fonc-11-709070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/fe99bb3dad39/fonc-11-709070-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/0a4cb05d8543/fonc-11-709070-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/b341e8757464/fonc-11-709070-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/5dda6d77d966/fonc-11-709070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/b7733601b201/fonc-11-709070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/e5039e778c83/fonc-11-709070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/fe99bb3dad39/fonc-11-709070-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/0a4cb05d8543/fonc-11-709070-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e9c/8315047/b341e8757464/fonc-11-709070-g006.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Front Oncol. 2021-7-13

[2]
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012-1-20

[3]
[Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution MRI for assessment mesorectal lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018-7-25

[4]
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2018-9-26

[5]
Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T Category and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2016-8

[6]
Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Cancer. 2021-9-26

[7]
EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2019-4-17

[8]
[MRI associated biomarker analysis for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in T1-2 stage rectal cancer].

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021-2-23

[9]

2014-9

[10]
Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Health Technol Assess. 2011-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Deep learning model for predicting lymph node metastasis around rectal cancer based on rectal tumor core area and mesangial imaging features.

BMC Med Imaging. 2025-9-1

[2]
Lymph nodes in MRI-based early-stage rectal cancer: can MRI accurately predict lymph node involvement?

Eur Radiol. 2025-8-25

[3]
Multimodal Preoperative Management of Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Existing Guidelines.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2025-6-24

[4]
The Value of MRI-Based Radiomics in Predicting the Pathological Nodal Status of Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bioengineering (Basel). 2025-7-21

[5]
Predictive Utility of Structured MRI Reporting for Rectal Cancer Outcomes.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-6-10

[6]
Predicting lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer patients using MRI radiomics: a multicenter retrospective study.

Sci Rep. 2025-4-29

[7]
Artificial intelligence in magnetic resonance imaging for predicting lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Eur Radiol. 2025-4-12

[8]
Semantic-Attention Enhanced DSC-Transformer for Lymph Node Ultrasound Classification and Remote Diagnostics.

Bioengineering (Basel). 2025-2-16

[9]
Evaluation of MRI characterisation of histopathologically matched lymph nodes and other mesorectal nodal structures in rectal cancer.

Eur Radiol. 2025-1-21

[10]
State-of-the-art performance of deep learning methods for pre-operative radiologic staging of colorectal cancer lymph node metastasis: a scoping review.

BMJ Open. 2024-12-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
USPIO-enhanced MRI of lymph nodes in rectal cancer: A node-to-node comparison with histopathology.

Eur J Radiol. 2021-5

[2]
Multiregional-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Combined With Clinical Data Improves Efficacy in Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis of Rectal Cancer.

Front Oncol. 2021-2-18

[3]
An MRI-based multi-objective radiomics model predicts lymph node status in patients with rectal cancer.

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021-5

[4]
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in (Future) Cancer Staging: Note the Nodes.

Invest Radiol. 2021-1

[5]
Prediction Model Combining Clinical and MR Data for Diagnosis of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Rectal Cancer.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021-3

[6]
Assessment of T and N staging with MRIT in lower and middle rectal cancer and impact on clinical strategy.

J Int Med Res. 2020-6

[7]
Radiomics: A primer for the radiation oncologist.

Cancer Radiother. 2020-8

[8]
MRI-based guidelines for selective neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: Does MRI adequately predict the indication for radiotherapy in daily practice in a large teaching hospital.

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020-3

[9]
Extramural spread of rectal cancer and the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition, 2017.

Ann Oncol. 2019-8-1

[10]
EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2019-4-17

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索