Coleman Carver J, Yeager Ray A, Riggs Daniel W, Coleman Nathan C, Garcia George R, Bhatnagar Aruni, Pope C Arden
Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, United States.
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106797. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106797. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
Several studies suggest that living in areas of high surrounding greenness may be associated with a lower cardiopulmonary mortality risk. However, associations of greenness with specific causes of death in cancer patients and survivors has not been examined and it is unknown whether this relationship is affected by area levels of fine particulate matter air pollution (PM). This study evaluated associations between greenness and PM on causes of death in a large, U.S.-based cohort of cancer patients and survivors.
Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data were used to generate a cohort of 5,529,005 cancer patients and survivors from 2000 to 2016. Census-tract Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) during May-October from 2003 to 2016 was population-weighted to act as a county-level greenness measure. County-level PM exposure was estimated from annual concentrations averaged from 1999 to 2015. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to estimate the association between greenness, PM, and cause-specific mortality while controlling for age, sex, race, and other individual and county level variables.
An IQR increase in greenness was associated with a decrease in cancer mortality for cancer patients (Hazard ratio of 0.94, 95% CI: 0.93-0.95), but not for cardiopulmonary mortality (0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00). Inversely, an increase in 10 μg/m PM was associated with increased cardiopulmonary mortality (1.24, 95% CI: 1.19-1.29), but not cancer mortality (0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-1.00). Hazard ratios were robust to inclusion of PM in models with greenness and vice versa. Although exposure estimates were constant over most stratifications, greenness seemed to benefit individuals diagnosed with high survivability cancers (0.92, 95% CI: 0.90-0.95) more than those with low survivability cancers (0.98. 95% CI: 0.96-0.99).
Higher levels of greenness are associated with lower cancer mortality in cancer patients. The evidence suggests minimal confounding between greenness and PM exposures and risk of mortality.
多项研究表明,生活在周边绿化程度高的地区可能与较低的心肺死亡率风险相关。然而,绿化程度与癌症患者及幸存者特定死因之间的关联尚未得到研究,且这种关系是否受细颗粒物空气污染(PM)的区域水平影响也尚不清楚。本研究评估了在美国一个大型癌症患者及幸存者队列中,绿化程度和PM与死因之间的关联。
利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据生成了一个包含2000年至2016年期间5529005名癌症患者及幸存者的队列。对2003年至2016年5月至10月期间人口普查区的归一化植被指数(NDVI)进行人口加权,作为县级绿化程度的衡量指标。根据1999年至2015年的年均浓度估算县级PM暴露量。在控制年龄、性别、种族以及其他个体和县级变量的同时,使用Cox比例风险模型来估计绿化程度、PM与特定病因死亡率之间的关联。
绿化程度每增加一个四分位间距,癌症患者的癌症死亡率就会降低(风险比为0.94,95%置信区间:0.93 - 0.95),但心肺死亡率没有降低(0.98,95%置信区间:0.96 - 1.00)。相反,PM每增加10μg/m³与心肺死亡率增加相关(1.24,95%置信区间:1.19 - 1.29),但与癌症死亡率无关(0.99,95%置信区间:0.97 - 1.00)。在包含绿化程度的模型中纳入PM,以及在包含PM的模型中纳入绿化程度,风险比均保持稳健。尽管在大多数分层中暴露估计值是恒定的,但绿化程度似乎对诊断为高生存率癌症的个体(0.92,95%置信区间:0.90 - 0.95)的益处大于低生存率癌症个体(0.98,95%置信区间:0.96 - 0.99)。
较高的绿化程度与癌症患者较低的癌症死亡率相关。证据表明绿化程度与PM暴露及死亡率风险之间的混杂作用极小。