Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States of America.
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, United States of America.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 10;824:153848. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153848. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
Several cohort studies suggest greenness is associated with decreased mortality risk. Potential confounding by or interactions between physical activity and air pollution remains unclear. This study evaluates associations of greenness, air pollution, and physical activity with mortality risk and investigates confounding and effect modification across these key risk factors. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data covering 1997-2014 were linked to the National Death Index to generate a cohort of 403,748 individuals with 39,528 deaths. Greenness, represented by census-tract Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for the seasonal period of May-October, was averaged over the years 2003-2016. Air pollution was estimated by census-tract level PM concentrations from 1999 to 2015. Cox Proportional Hazard Models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for differences in greenness, air pollution, and physical activity. Alternative models that evaluated potential confounding and stratified models that evaluated effect modification were examined. Mortality risks were associated with PM (HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09-1.19 per 10 μg/m) and physical inactivity (1.49, 1.44-1.54 relative to sufficiently active), but not with greenness (1.01, 0.99-1.03 per IQR). The PM-mortality association was mitigated at high levels of greenness (1.05, 0.91-1.22). There was no strong evidence of confounding between air pollution, physical activity, and greenness. However, stratified analysis suggested effect modification for PM and NDVI by physical activity. A significant protective greenness-mortality association was observed for only highly active individuals (0.91, 0.86-0.96). Also, relatively high PM-mortality HRs were observed for more physically active individuals (1.25, 1.12-1.40). PM air pollution and physical inactivity are robustly associated with mortality risk. Greenness may be most beneficial and air pollution relatively harmful to highly active individuals. This analysis provides evidence that, in addition to not smoking, being physically active and living in a clean, green environment contributes to improved health and reduced risk of mortality.
几项队列研究表明,绿色环境与降低死亡率风险有关。但目前尚不清楚体力活动与空气污染之间是否存在潜在的混杂因素或相互作用。本研究评估了绿色环境、空气污染和体力活动与死亡率风险的关联,并调查了这些关键风险因素之间的混杂和效应修饰。将涵盖 1997 年至 2014 年的国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)数据与国家死亡指数相联系,生成了一个包含 403748 名参与者和 39528 例死亡的队列。绿色环境由代表 5 月至 10 月季节期的普查区归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)表示,平均值来自 2003 年至 2016 年的数据。空气污染由 1999 年至 2015 年的普查区水平 PM 浓度估算。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计绿色环境、空气污染和体力活动差异的危险比(HR)。还评估了潜在混杂因素的替代模型和分层模型,以评估效应修饰。死亡率与 PM(HR=1.14,95%CI:每 10μg/m 增加 1.09-1.19)和体力活动不足(1.49,1.44-1.54 与足够活跃相比)相关,但与绿色环境无关(每 IQR 增加 1.01,0.99-1.03)。在高绿色水平下,PM 与死亡率的关联减轻(1.05,0.91-1.22)。空气污染、体力活动和绿色环境之间没有明显的混杂证据。然而,分层分析表明,PM 和 NDVI 与体力活动之间存在效应修饰。仅在高度活跃的个体中观察到显著的绿色环境-死亡率保护关联(0.91,0.86-0.96)。此外,对于更活跃的个体,相对较高的 PM 死亡率 HR 也被观察到(1.25,1.12-1.40)。PM 空气污染和体力活动不足与死亡率风险密切相关。绿色环境可能对高度活跃的个体最有益,而空气污染对其相对有害。本分析提供的证据表明,除了不吸烟外,积极锻炼和生活在清洁、绿色的环境中有助于改善健康状况并降低死亡率风险。