Suppr超能文献

双重屏蔽保护与舒适度——定量评估

Double masking protection vs. comfort-A quantitative assessment.

作者信息

Arumuru Venugopal, Samantaray Sidhartha Sankar, Pasa Jangyadatta

机构信息

Applied Fluids Group, School of Mechanical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar 752050, India.

出版信息

Phys Fluids (1994). 2021 Jul;33(7):077120. doi: 10.1063/5.0058571. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

Abstract

COVID-19 has forced humankind to adopt face masks as an integral part of everyday life. This preventive measure is an effective source control technique to curb the spread of COVID-19 and other similar diseases. The virus responsible for causing COVID-19 has undergone several mutations in the recent past, including B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, and N501Y, B.1.617, with a higher infectious rate. These viruses' variants are mainly responsible for the recent spike in COVID-19 cases and associated steep rise in mortality rate worldwide. Under these circumstances, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and health experts recommend double masking, which mainly includes a surgical mask and a cotton mask for the general public. This combination provides an additional layer of protection and masks fitment to minimize the leakage of droplets expelled during coughing, sneezing, talking, and breathing. This leakage may cause airborne transmission of the virus. In the present study, we report a systematic quantitative unsteady pressure measurement supplement with flow visualization to quantify the effectiveness of a single and double mask. We have also evaluated double masking consisting of a surgical mask and an N-95 mask used by medical professionals. A simple knot improves the surgical mask fitment significantly, and hence, the leakage of droplets is minimized. The leakage of the droplets was reduced to a large extent by using a double mask combination of a two-layer cotton mask over the surgical mask with a knot. The double mask combination of surgical + N-95 and two-layer cotton + N-95 masks showed the most promising results, and no leakage of the droplets is observed in the forward direction. A double mask combination of surgical and N-95 mask offers 8.6% and 5.6% lower mean and peak pressures compared to surgical, and cotton mask. The best results are observed with cotton and N-95 masks with 54.6% and 23% lower mean and peak pressures than surgical and cotton masks; hence, this combination will offer more comfort to the wearer.

摘要

新冠疫情迫使人类将口罩作为日常生活中不可或缺的一部分。这种预防措施是一种有效的源头控制技术,可遏制新冠病毒及其他类似疾病的传播。导致新冠疫情的病毒在近期发生了多次变异,包括B.1.1.7、B.1.351、P.1和N501Y、B.1.617,其传染性更高。这些病毒变种是近期全球新冠病例激增以及死亡率大幅上升的主要原因。在这种情况下,疾病控制中心(CDC)和健康专家建议佩戴双层口罩,对于普通公众而言,主要是佩戴一个外科口罩和一个棉质口罩。这种组合提供了额外的一层防护以及口罩贴合度,以尽量减少咳嗽、打喷嚏、说话和呼吸时呼出飞沫的泄漏。这种泄漏可能会导致病毒的空气传播。在本研究中,我们报告了一项系统的定量非稳态压力测量,并辅以流动可视化,以量化单层和双层口罩的有效性。我们还评估了由医疗专业人员使用的外科口罩和N95口罩组成的双层口罩。一个简单的结能显著改善外科口罩的贴合度,从而将飞沫泄漏降至最低。通过在外科口罩上佩戴两层棉质口罩并系上一个结的双层口罩组合,飞沫泄漏在很大程度上得以减少。外科+N95口罩和两层棉质+N95口罩的双层口罩组合显示出最有前景的结果,在向前方向未观察到飞沫泄漏。与外科口罩和棉质口罩相比,外科口罩和N95口罩的双层口罩组合平均压力和峰值压力分别低8.6%和5.6%。棉质口罩和N95口罩的组合效果最佳,其平均压力和峰值压力分别比外科口罩和棉质口罩低54.6%和23%;因此,这种组合将为佩戴者提供更多舒适感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c67/8320463/bc14151fb49f/PHFLE6-000033-077120_1-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验