Suppr超能文献

采用达托霉素和头孢托罗林联合治疗与降级为万古霉素、达托霉素或头孢托罗林单药治疗对耐甲氧西林菌血症进行确定性治疗的临床结果

Clinical Outcomes With Definitive Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Bacteremia With Retained Daptomycin and Ceftaroline Combination Therapy vs De-escalation to Monotherapy With Vancomycin, Daptomycin, or Ceftaroline.

作者信息

Nichols Courtney N, Wardlow Lynn C, Coe Kelci E, Sobhanie Mohammad Mahdee E

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 22;8(7):ofab327. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab327. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lower mortality has been observed with combination therapy compared to monotherapy for methicillin-resistant (MRSA) bacteremia; however, there is a lack of evidence for continued combination therapy over de-escalation to monotherapy following bacteremia clearance.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study evaluating patients with MRSA bacteremia hospitalized from November 1, 2011, through July 31, 2019. Patients who received three to ten days of combination therapy followed by de-escalation to monotherapy were directly compared to patients retained on combination therapy. The primary composite outcome included inpatient infection-related mortality, 60-day readmission, and 60-day bacteremia recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 286 patients with MRSA bacteremia were identified, with 146 patients omitted based on exclusion criteria. The study population included 66 in the combination therapy group and 74 in the monotherapy group. Study population was 51% female (n = 71) and 78% white (n = 109) with median age of 46 years (IQR 34.5-61). No significant difference was observed in the primary composite outcome (21% combination therapy group vs 24% monotherapy group; =.66), with retained observations after controlling for confounders. Within this outcome, there was no significant difference in 60-day readmission (20% combination therapy group vs 18% monotherapy group; =.75), bacteremia recurrence (3% combination therapy group vs 7% monotherapy group; =.45), or inpatient infection-related mortality (2% combination therapy group vs 5% monotherapy group; = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was found in the composite outcome of 60-day bacteremia recurrence, readmission, or inpatient infection-related mortality for patients with MRSA bacteremia retained on combination therapy versus those de-escalated to monotherapy.

摘要

背景

与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌血症的单一疗法相比,联合疗法的死亡率更低;然而,对于菌血症清除后继续联合治疗而非降级为单一疗法,缺乏证据支持。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性研究,评估2011年11月1日至2019年7月31日期间住院的MRSA菌血症患者。将接受三至十天联合治疗后降级为单一疗法的患者与继续接受联合治疗的患者进行直接比较。主要复合结局包括住院感染相关死亡率、60天再入院率和60天菌血症复发率。

结果

共识别出286例MRSA菌血症患者,根据排除标准排除146例患者。研究人群包括联合治疗组66例和单一治疗组74例。研究人群中51%为女性(n = 71),78%为白人(n = 109),中位年龄为46岁(IQR 34.5 - 61)。在主要复合结局方面未观察到显著差异(联合治疗组为21%,单一治疗组为24%;P = 0.66),在控制混杂因素后仍保持该观察结果。在此结局中,60天再入院率(联合治疗组为20%,单一治疗组为18%;P = 0.75)、菌血症复发率(联合治疗组为3%,单一治疗组为7%;P = 0.45)或住院感染相关死亡率(联合治疗组为2%,单一治疗组为5%;P = 1.00)均无显著差异。

结论

对于继续接受联合治疗与降级为单一治疗的MRSA菌血症患者,在60天菌血症复发、再入院或住院感染相关死亡率的复合结局方面未发现差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c18b/8320268/db50123ef8f9/ofab327f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验