• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对骨科康复环境中使用虚拟咨询的偏好:来自离散选择实验的结果。

Patient preferences for use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: Results from a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Clinical Research Physiotherapist, Therapies Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, UK and PhD Student, School of Health Sciences, 7423University of Southampton, UK.

Associate Professor in Economics, Economics Department, Faculty of Economic, Social and Political Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Jan;27(1):62-73. doi: 10.1177/13558196211035427. Epub 2021 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1177/13558196211035427
PMID:34337980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8772015/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Virtual Consultations may reduce the need for face-to-face outpatient appointments, thereby potentially reducing the cost and time involved in delivering health care. This study reports a discrete choice experiment (DCE) that identifies factors that influence patient preferences for virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting.

METHODS

Previous research from the CONNECT (Care in Orthopaedics, burdeN of treatmeNt and the Effect of Communication Technology) Project and best practice guidance informed the development of our DCE. An efficient fractional factorial design with 16 choice scenarios was created that identified all main effects and partial two-way interactions. The design was divided into two blocks of eight scenarios each, to reduce the impact of cognitive fatigue. Data analysis were conducted using binary logit regression models.

RESULTS

Sixty-one paired response sets (122 subjects) were available for analysis. DCE factors (whether the therapist is known to the patient, duration of appointment, time of day) and demographic factors (patient qualifications, access to equipment, difficulty with activities, multiple health issues, travel costs) were significant predictors of preference. We estimate that a patient is less than 1% likely to prefer a virtual consultation if the patient has a degree, is without access to the equipment and software to undertake a virtual consultation, does not have difficulties with day-to-day activities, is undergoing rehabilitation for one problem area, has to pay less than £5 to travel, is having a consultation with a therapist not known to them, in 1 weeks' time, lasting 60 minutes, at 2 pm. We have developed a simple conceptual model to explain how these factors interact to inform preference, including patients' access to resources, context for the consultation and the requirements of the consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

This conceptual model provides the framework to focus attention towards factors that might influence patient preference for virtual consultations. Our model can inform the development of future technologies, trials, and qualitative work to further explore the mechanisms that influence preference.

摘要

目的

虚拟咨询可能会减少面对面门诊预约的需求,从而可能降低医疗保健的成本和时间。本研究报告了一项离散选择实验(DCE),该实验确定了影响患者在骨科康复环境中对虚拟咨询偏好的因素。

方法

先前来自 CONNECT(骨科治疗、治疗负担和沟通技术的效果)项目和最佳实践指南的研究为我们的 DCE 的开发提供了信息。创建了一个具有 16 个选择场景的高效分数阶因子设计,该设计确定了所有主要效应和部分双向交互作用。该设计分为两个 8 个场景的块,以减少认知疲劳的影响。数据分析使用二项逻辑回归模型进行。

结果

可用于分析的 61 对响应集(122 名受试者)。DCE 因素(治疗师是否为患者所熟知、预约持续时间、一天中的时间)和人口统计学因素(患者资格、是否有设备访问权限、日常活动的困难程度、有多个健康问题、旅行费用)是偏好的重要预测因素。我们估计,如果患者具有学位、无法访问进行虚拟咨询的设备和软件、没有日常活动困难、正在接受一个问题区域的康复治疗、旅行费用低于 5 英镑、正在与不认识的治疗师进行咨询、预约时间为 1 周、预约时间为 60 分钟、预约时间为下午 2 点,那么患者选择虚拟咨询的可能性低于 1%。我们已经开发了一个简单的概念模型来解释这些因素如何相互作用以告知偏好,包括患者对资源的访问、咨询的背景以及咨询的要求。

结论

该概念模型为关注可能影响患者对虚拟咨询偏好的因素提供了框架。我们的模型可以为未来技术、试验和定性工作提供信息,以进一步探索影响偏好的机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc71/8772015/260bcd40fa82/10.1177_13558196211035427-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc71/8772015/1e1fab2c017c/10.1177_13558196211035427-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc71/8772015/260bcd40fa82/10.1177_13558196211035427-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc71/8772015/1e1fab2c017c/10.1177_13558196211035427-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc71/8772015/260bcd40fa82/10.1177_13558196211035427-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient preferences for use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: Results from a discrete choice experiment.患者对骨科康复环境中使用虚拟咨询的偏好:来自离散选择实验的结果。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Jan;27(1):62-73. doi: 10.1177/13558196211035427. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
2
A qualitative investigation into the results of a discrete choice experiment and the impact of COVID-19 on patient preferences for virtual consultations.对离散选择实验结果以及新冠疫情对患者虚拟会诊偏好影响的定性调查。
Arch Physiother. 2021 Sep 6;11(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00115-0.
3
Protocol for the CONNECT project: a mixed methods study investigating patient preferences for communication technology use in orthopaedic rehabilitation consultations.CONNECT项目方案:一项混合方法研究,调查患者对骨科康复会诊中使用通信技术的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e035210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035210.
4
Factors that influence patient preferences for virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: a qualitative study.影响骨科康复环境中患者对虚拟咨询偏好的因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 25;11(2):e041038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041038.
5
Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.骨科康复环境中虚拟会诊的应用:作为患者的体验变化如何影响患者偏好?一项系统综述与定性综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 16;10(9):e036197. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036197.
6
Virtual outreach: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint teleconferenced medical consultations.虚拟外展:联合电话会议式医学咨询的随机对照试验与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(50):1-106, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta8500.
7
Patient, clinician and manager experience of the accelerated implementation of virtual consultations following COVID-19: A qualitative study of preferences in a tertiary orthopaedic rehabilitation setting.患者、临床医生和管理人员在 COVID-19 之后对加速实施虚拟咨询的体验:在三级骨科康复环境中对偏好的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):775-790. doi: 10.1111/hex.13425. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
Would you zoom with your doctor? A discrete choice experiment to identify patient preferences for video and in-clinic consultations in German primary care.你愿意和你的医生视频吗?一项识别德国初级保健中患者对视频和门诊咨询偏好的离散选择实验。
J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Jul;30(6):969-992. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221111975. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
9
Patients' valuation of the prescribing nurse in primary care: a discrete choice experiment.患者对初级医疗保健中开处方护士的评价:一项离散选择实验。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2223-35. doi: 10.1111/hex.12193. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
10
Patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-clinic consultation in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,患者在初级保健中对远程医疗与门诊咨询的偏好。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 22;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01640-y.

引用本文的文献

1
What Service Characteristics Are Important to Patients Treated in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy Services: Designing a Discrete Choice Experiment.对于接受肌肉骨骼物理治疗服务的患者而言,哪些服务特征至关重要:设计一项离散选择实验。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Sep;23(3):e70175. doi: 10.1002/msc.70175.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Patient satisfaction in virtual upper-limb orthopaedic clinics: a retrospective review.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid mobilization of a virtual pediatric chronic pain clinic in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间加拿大迅速组建虚拟儿科慢性疼痛诊所。
Can J Pain. 2020 Aug 5;4(1):162-167. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2020.1771688.
2
Factors that influence patient preferences for virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: a qualitative study.影响骨科康复环境中患者对虚拟咨询偏好的因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 25;11(2):e041038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041038.
3
Use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: how do changes in the work of being a patient influence patient preferences? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.
虚拟上肢骨科诊所的患者满意度:一项回顾性研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 5;14(1):e002938. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002938.
4
Patient Preferences for Telerehabilitation Compared to In-Person Physiotherapy: A Binary Discrete Choice Experiment.与面对面物理治疗相比,患者对远程康复的偏好:一项二元离散选择实验。
Physiother Res Int. 2025 Apr;30(2):e70042. doi: 10.1002/pri.70042.
5
Virtually the same, but remotely different: health professionals, parents and children's experiences of remote out-patient consultations.几乎相同,但又略有不同:医疗专业人员、家长及儿童对远程门诊咨询的体验。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jun 1;64(6):3361-3369. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf106.
6
Preferences for Rehabilitation in Persons with a History of Stroke: A Discrete Choice Experiment.中风病史患者对康复治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jul 12;17:1611-1620. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S416699. eCollection 2023.
7
Patient-clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK.远程咨询中的医患动态:对英国心脏病学和风湿病学门诊的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 30;13(5):e070923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070923.
8
Digital physiotherapy assessment vs conventional face-to-face physiotherapy assessment of patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review.数字物理治疗评估与传统面对面物理治疗评估肌肉骨骼疾病患者的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 21;18(3):e0283013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283013. eCollection 2023.
9
The patient acceptability of a remotely delivered pain management programme for people with persistent musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative evaluation.针对持续性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的远程疼痛管理方案的患者可接受性:一项定性评估。
Br J Pain. 2022 Dec;16(6):581-592. doi: 10.1177/20494637221106411. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
10
Acceptability of, and preferences for, remote consulting during COVID-19 among older patients with two common long-term musculoskeletal conditions: findings from three qualitative studies and recommendations for practice.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,两种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病老年患者对远程咨询的可接受性和偏好:三项定性研究的结果和对实践的建议。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 2;23(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05273-1.
骨科康复环境中虚拟会诊的应用:作为患者的体验变化如何影响患者偏好?一项系统综述与定性综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 16;10(9):e036197. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036197.
4
Rapid implementation of virtual clinics due to COVID-19: report and early evaluation of a quality improvement initiative.因新冠疫情而迅速实施的虚拟诊所:一项质量改进举措的报告与早期评估
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 May;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000985.
5
Video Consultations Between Patients and Clinicians in Diabetes, Cancer, and Heart Failure Services: Linguistic Ethnographic Study of Video-Mediated Interaction.糖尿病、癌症和心力衰竭服务中患者与临床医生之间的视频会诊:视频介导互动的语言人种志研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 11;22(5):e18378. doi: 10.2196/18378.
6
Virtual health care in the era of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的虚拟医疗保健
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1180-1181. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30818-7.
7
Remote Treatment Delivery in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.应对新冠疫情的远程治疗服务
Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(3):130-132. doi: 10.1159/000507376. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
8
Protocol for the CONNECT project: a mixed methods study investigating patient preferences for communication technology use in orthopaedic rehabilitation consultations.CONNECT项目方案:一项混合方法研究,调查患者对骨科康复会诊中使用通信技术的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e035210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035210.
9
Choosing Video Instead of In-Clinic Consultations in Primary Care in Israel: Discrete Choice Experiment Among Key Stakeholders-Patients, Primary Care Physicians, and Policy Makers.选择视频咨询而非以色列初级保健中的门诊咨询:关键利益相关者(患者、初级保健医生和政策制定者)间的离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2019 Oct;22(10):1187-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
What is the acceptability of real time 1:1 videoconferencing between clinicians and patients for a follow-up consultation for multi-directional shoulder instability?对于多向性肩关节不稳定的随访咨询,临床医生与患者之间进行实时一对一视频会议的可接受性如何?
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Feb;11(1):53-59. doi: 10.1177/1758573218796815. Epub 2018 Sep 11.