Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 May 30;13(5):e070923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070923.
Explore the experiences of patients and clinicians in rheumatology and cardiology outpatient clinics during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the impact of remote consultations on interpersonal dynamics.
Qualitative study using semistructured interviews, conducted between February and June 2021.
The rheumatology and cardiology departments of a general hospital in England, UK.
All clinicians and a convenience sample of 100 patients in each department who had taken part in a remote consultation in the past month were invited to take part. Twenty-five interviews were conducted (13 with patients, 12 with clinicians).
Three themes were developed through the analysis: adapting to the dynamics of remote consultations, impact on the patient's experience and impact on the clinician's experience. The majority of remote consultations experienced by both patients and clinicians had been via telephone. Both clinicians and patients found remote consultations to be more business-like and focused, with the absence of pauses restricting time for reflection. For patients with stable, well-managed conditions, remote consultations were felt to be appropriate and could be more convenient than in-person consultations. However, the loss of visual cues meant some patients felt they could not give a holistic view of their condition and limited clinicians' ability to gather and convey information. Clinicians adjusted their approach by asking more questions, checking understanding more frequently and expressing empathy verbally, but felt patients still shared fewer concerns remotely than in person; a perception with which patients concurred.
These findings highlight the importance of ensuring, for each patient, that remote care is appropriate. Future research should focus on developing ways to support both clinicians and patients to gather and provide all information necessary during remote consultations, to enhance communication and trust.
探讨风湿科和心内科门诊患者和临床医生在 COVID-19 大流行第一年的经历,重点关注远程咨询对人际动态的影响。
使用半结构式访谈的定性研究,于 2021 年 2 月至 6 月进行。
英国一家综合医院的风湿科和心内科。
邀请每个科室中过去一个月内参加过远程咨询的所有临床医生和 100 名患者中的便利样本参加。共进行了 25 次访谈(患者 13 次,临床医生 12 次)。
通过分析得出了三个主题:适应远程咨询的动态、对患者体验的影响和对临床医生体验的影响。患者和临床医生体验到的大多数远程咨询都是通过电话进行的。临床医生和患者都认为远程咨询更加注重业务,没有停顿限制了思考时间。对于病情稳定、管理良好的患者,他们认为远程咨询是合适的,而且可能比面对面咨询更方便。然而,缺乏视觉线索意味着一些患者觉得自己无法全面描述自己的病情,也限制了临床医生收集和传达信息的能力。临床医生通过多问问题、更频繁地检查理解情况和口头表达同理心来调整他们的方法,但他们觉得患者在远程咨询中比在面对面咨询中分享的担忧更少;患者也有这种看法。
这些发现强调了确保为每位患者提供适当的远程护理的重要性。未来的研究应侧重于开发方法,以支持临床医生和患者在远程咨询中收集和提供所有必要的信息,以增强沟通和信任。