Suppr超能文献

关于特定烟草产品危害的知识与信念:H.I.N.T. 调查结果

Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding Harm From Specific Tobacco Products: Findings From the H.I.N.T. Survey.

作者信息

Lin Wenxue, Muscat Joshua E

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2021 Aug 2:8901171211026116. doi: 10.1177/08901171211026116.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Determine whether dual tobacco users have different levels of knowledge about nicotine addiction, perceived harm beliefs of low nicotine cigarettes (LNCs) and beliefs about electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes).

DESIGN

Quantitative, Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Health Information National Trends Survey 5 (Cycle 3, 2019).

PARTICIPANTS

Nationally representative adult non-smokers (n=3113), exclusive cigarette smokers (n=302), and dual (cigarette and e-cigarette) users (n=77).

MEASURES

The survey included single item measures on whether nicotine causes addiction and whether nicotine causes cancer. A five-point Likert scale assessed comparative harm of e-cigarettes and LNCs relative to conventional combustible cigarettes (1=much more harmful, 3=equally harmful…5 = much less harmful, or don't know).

ANALYSIS

We used weighted multiple linear regression model to estimate means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of e-cigarettes and LNCs beliefs by current tobacco user status.

RESULTS

Over 97% of dual users, 83% of non-smokers and 86% of exclusive cigarette smokers correctly identified that nicotine is addictive. The majority of subjects incorrectly identified nicotine as a cause of cancer, with dual users having the lowest proportion of incorrect responses (60%). Dual users rated e-cigarette harmfulness as less harmful than combustibles (mean=2.20; 95% CI=1.73, 2.66) while exclusive cigarette smokers and non-smokers rated them as similarly harmful. LNCs were considered equally harmful and addictive as conventional cigarettes.

CONCLUSION

Dual users had a higher knowledge base of tobacco-related health effects. The effectiveness of policies or medical recommendations to encourage smokers to switch from cigarettes to LNCs or e-cigarettes will need to consider accurate and inaccurate misperceptions about the harm and addictiveness of nicotine. Improved public health messages about different tobacco products are needed.

摘要

目的

确定同时使用两种烟草制品的人群在尼古丁成瘾知识、对低尼古丁香烟(LNC)的危害认知以及对电子烟的认知方面是否存在差异。

设计

定量、横断面研究。

背景

健康信息国家趋势调查5(2019年第3轮)。

参与者

具有全国代表性的成年非吸烟者(n = 3113)、只吸卷烟者(n = 302)以及同时使用卷烟和电子烟者(n = 77)。

测量方法

该调查包括关于尼古丁是否会导致成瘾以及尼古丁是否会致癌的单项测量。采用五点李克特量表评估电子烟和低尼古丁香烟相对于传统可燃香烟的相对危害程度(1 = 危害大得多,3 = 危害相同……5 = 危害小得多,或不知道)。

分析

我们使用加权多元线性回归模型,根据当前烟草使用状况估计对电子烟和低尼古丁香烟认知的均值和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

超过97%的同时使用两种烟草制品者、83%的非吸烟者和86%的只吸卷烟者正确认识到尼古丁会上瘾。大多数受试者错误地认为尼古丁会致癌,其中同时使用两种烟草制品者的错误回答比例最低(60%)。同时使用两种烟草制品者认为电子烟的危害小于可燃香烟(均值 = 2.20;95% CI = 1.73,2.66),而只吸卷烟者和非吸烟者认为它们的危害相似。低尼古丁香烟被认为与传统香烟的危害和成瘾性相同。

结论

同时使用两种烟草制品者对烟草相关健康影响的知识储备更多。鼓励吸烟者从卷烟转向低尼古丁香烟或电子烟的政策或医学建议的有效性,需要考虑对尼古丁危害和成瘾性的准确和不准确的误解。需要改进关于不同烟草制品的公共卫生信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验