Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症患者的自我报告和设备测量睡眠参数之间的差异。

Discrepancies between self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

出版信息

J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Feb 1;18(2):415-421. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9586.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Sleep problems are a common consequence of multiple sclerosis; however, there is limited evidence regarding the agreement between device-measured and self-reported sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis. The present study examined the agreement between self-reported and device-measured parameters of sleep quality in a sample of adults with multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

Participants (n = 49) completed a 7-day sleep diary and wore a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3×+ (ActiGraph Corp., Pensecola, FL) for seven consecutive nights to quantify self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters, respectively.

RESULTS

There was a significant discrepancy between self-reported and device-measured parameters of total time in bed (mean difference = 19.8 [51.3] min), sleep onset latency (mean difference = 22.2 [19.5] min), and frequency of awakenings during the night (mean difference = 12.8 [6.8]). Intraclass correlation estimates indicated poor agreement between methods on most parameters, except for total time in bed (intraclass correlation = 0.80). Bland-Altman plots suggested that total time in bed and total sleep time had acceptable levels of agreement and linear regression analyses indicated that sleep onset latency ( = 113.91, B = -1.34, < .001), number of awakenings ( = 543.34, B = 1.85, < .001), and sleep efficiency ( = 18.39, B = -0.77, < .001) had significant proportional bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results draw attention to the discrepancies between sleep parameter measurements and highlight the importance of including both self-report and device-measured outcomes for a complete and accurate representation of sleep in adults with multiple sclerosis.

CITATION

Cederberg KLJ, Mathison BG, Schuetz ML, Motl RW. Discrepancies between self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis. . 2022;18(2):415-421.

摘要

研究目的

睡眠问题是多发性硬化症的常见后果;然而,关于多发性硬化症成人中设备测量和自我报告的睡眠参数之间的一致性,证据有限。本研究检查了多发性硬化症成人样本中自我报告和设备测量的睡眠质量参数之间的一致性。

方法

参与者(n=49)完成了 7 天的睡眠日记,并连续 7 晚佩戴腕戴式 ActiGraph GT3×+(ActiGraph 公司,彭萨科拉,佛罗里达州),分别量化自我报告和设备测量的睡眠参数。

结果

自我报告和设备测量的总卧床时间(平均差异=19.8[51.3]分钟)、入睡潜伏期(平均差异=22.2[19.5]分钟)和夜间觉醒频率(平均差异=12.8[6.8])参数之间存在显著差异。组内相关估计表明,除总卧床时间(组内相关=0.80)外,大多数参数之间的方法一致性较差。Bland-Altman 图表明总卧床时间和总睡眠时间具有可接受的一致性水平,线性回归分析表明入睡潜伏期(=113.91,B=-1.34,<0.001)、觉醒次数(=543.34,B=1.85,<0.001)和睡眠效率(=18.39,B=-0.77,<0.001)具有显著的比例偏差。

结论

我们的结果提请注意睡眠参数测量之间的差异,并强调在多发性硬化症成人中为了全面准确地描述睡眠,包括自我报告和设备测量结果的重要性。

引文

Cederberg KLJ,Mathison BG,Schuetz ML,Motl RW。多发性硬化症成人中自我报告和设备测量睡眠参数之间的差异。。2022;18(2):415-421。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Sleep Abnormalities in Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症中的睡眠异常
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2019 Jan 31;21(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11940-019-0544-7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验