Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Feb 1;18(2):415-421. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9586.
Sleep problems are a common consequence of multiple sclerosis; however, there is limited evidence regarding the agreement between device-measured and self-reported sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis. The present study examined the agreement between self-reported and device-measured parameters of sleep quality in a sample of adults with multiple sclerosis.
Participants (n = 49) completed a 7-day sleep diary and wore a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3×+ (ActiGraph Corp., Pensecola, FL) for seven consecutive nights to quantify self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters, respectively.
There was a significant discrepancy between self-reported and device-measured parameters of total time in bed (mean difference = 19.8 [51.3] min), sleep onset latency (mean difference = 22.2 [19.5] min), and frequency of awakenings during the night (mean difference = 12.8 [6.8]). Intraclass correlation estimates indicated poor agreement between methods on most parameters, except for total time in bed (intraclass correlation = 0.80). Bland-Altman plots suggested that total time in bed and total sleep time had acceptable levels of agreement and linear regression analyses indicated that sleep onset latency ( = 113.91, B = -1.34, < .001), number of awakenings ( = 543.34, B = 1.85, < .001), and sleep efficiency ( = 18.39, B = -0.77, < .001) had significant proportional bias.
Our results draw attention to the discrepancies between sleep parameter measurements and highlight the importance of including both self-report and device-measured outcomes for a complete and accurate representation of sleep in adults with multiple sclerosis.
Cederberg KLJ, Mathison BG, Schuetz ML, Motl RW. Discrepancies between self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis. . 2022;18(2):415-421.
睡眠问题是多发性硬化症的常见后果;然而,关于多发性硬化症成人中设备测量和自我报告的睡眠参数之间的一致性,证据有限。本研究检查了多发性硬化症成人样本中自我报告和设备测量的睡眠质量参数之间的一致性。
参与者(n=49)完成了 7 天的睡眠日记,并连续 7 晚佩戴腕戴式 ActiGraph GT3×+(ActiGraph 公司,彭萨科拉,佛罗里达州),分别量化自我报告和设备测量的睡眠参数。
自我报告和设备测量的总卧床时间(平均差异=19.8[51.3]分钟)、入睡潜伏期(平均差异=22.2[19.5]分钟)和夜间觉醒频率(平均差异=12.8[6.8])参数之间存在显著差异。组内相关估计表明,除总卧床时间(组内相关=0.80)外,大多数参数之间的方法一致性较差。Bland-Altman 图表明总卧床时间和总睡眠时间具有可接受的一致性水平,线性回归分析表明入睡潜伏期(=113.91,B=-1.34,<0.001)、觉醒次数(=543.34,B=1.85,<0.001)和睡眠效率(=18.39,B=-0.77,<0.001)具有显著的比例偏差。
我们的结果提请注意睡眠参数测量之间的差异,并强调在多发性硬化症成人中为了全面准确地描述睡眠,包括自我报告和设备测量结果的重要性。
Cederberg KLJ,Mathison BG,Schuetz ML,Motl RW。多发性硬化症成人中自我报告和设备测量睡眠参数之间的差异。。2022;18(2):415-421。