School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
CITIC Group Corporation, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0255476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255476. eCollection 2021.
Financial bubbles have always been a topic of long-term concern for economists. Understanding bubble phenomenon and dating the period of bubbles in real time can provide an early warning diagnosis for financial bubbles and help regulatory authorities to control it and maintain market order. The generalized sup ADF (GSADF) and backward sup ADF (BSADF) tests with flexible window width can effectively detect and date periodically collapsing bubbles in real time. Based on the financial present value model, this paper applies right-tail recursive ADF test to test multiple bubbles in China's multi-level stock market. Unlike the other researches in China, the ratios of the real stock prices' natural logarithm to the real dividends' natural logarithm are used for our testing instead of stock price index. Empirical results show that there are 8 bubbles in the Main-Board Market, 6 bubbles in the Small and Medium Enterprises Board (SMEs), and 4 bubbles in the Growth Enterprise Market (GEM). These bubbles are liquidity-driven and presuppose a loose credit cycle, with the exception of bubbles in 2014-2015. The frequent emergence of bubbles in a short time indicates that China's stock market is still emerging market. In addition, frequent fluctuations imply there is a serious "herd effect" and a lack of monitoring mechanism for bubble risk. This study not only enrich the real-time dynamic research on periodical bubbles of China's stock market, but also provide an empirical reference for investors' investment choices, financial decisions of listed companies and warning mechanism of regulatory authorities.
金融泡沫一直是经济学家长期关注的话题。理解泡沫现象并实时确定泡沫的时期,可以为金融泡沫提供早期预警诊断,并帮助监管机构控制和维护市场秩序。广义 Sup ADF(GSADF)和后向 Sup ADF(BSADF)测试具有灵活的窗口宽度,可以有效地实时检测和确定周期性崩溃的泡沫。基于金融现值模型,本文应用右尾递归 ADF 检验对中国多层次股票市场中的多个泡沫进行检验。与中国的其他研究不同,我们的检验使用的是实际股票价格的自然对数与实际股息的自然对数之比,而不是股票价格指数。实证结果表明,主板市场存在 8 个泡沫,中小企业板(SMEs)存在 6 个泡沫,创业板(GEM)存在 4 个泡沫。这些泡沫是由流动性驱动的,并且假设存在宽松的信用周期,2014-2015 年的泡沫除外。在短时间内频繁出现泡沫表明,中国股票市场仍处于新兴市场阶段。此外,频繁波动意味着存在严重的“羊群效应”和缺乏对泡沫风险的监控机制。本研究不仅丰富了中国股票市场周期性泡沫的实时动态研究,也为投资者的投资选择、上市公司的财务决策和监管机构的预警机制提供了经验参考。