Thomaston Jessica L, Samways Marley L, Konstantinidi Athina, Ma Chunlong, Hu Yanmei, Bruce Macdonald Hannah E, Wang Jun, Essex Jonathan W, DeGrado William F, Kolocouris Antonios
Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, Section of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, United States.
School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Biochemistry. 2021 Aug 3. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00437.
The influenza A M2 wild-type (WT) proton channel is the target of the anti-influenza drug rimantadine. Rimantadine has two enantiomers, though most investigations into drug binding and inhibition have used a racemic mixture. Solid-state NMR experiments using the full length-M2 WT have shown significant spectral differences that were interpreted to indicate tighter binding for ()- vs ()-rimantadine. However, it was unclear if this correlates with a functional difference in drug binding and inhibition. Using X-ray crystallography, we have determined that both ()- and ()-rimantadine bind to the M2 WT pore with slight differences in the hydration of each enantiomer. However, this does not result in a difference in potency or binding kinetics, as shown by similar values for , , and in electrophysiological assays and for EC values in cellular assays. We concluded that the slight differences in hydration for the ()- and ()-rimantadine enantiomers are not relevant to drug binding or channel inhibition. To further explore the effect of the hydration of the M2 pore on binding affinity, the water structure was evaluated by grand canonical ensemble molecular dynamics simulations as a function of the chemical potential of the water. Initially, the two layers of ordered water molecules between the bound drug and the channel's gating His37 residues mask the drug's chirality. As the chemical potential becomes more unfavorable, the drug translocates down to the lower water layer, and the interaction becomes more sensitive to chirality. These studies suggest the feasibility of displacing the upper water layer and specifically recognizing the lower water layers in novel drugs.
甲型流感病毒M2野生型(WT)质子通道是抗流感药物金刚乙胺的作用靶点。金刚乙胺有两种对映体,不过大多数关于药物结合和抑制作用的研究都使用了外消旋混合物。使用全长M2 WT进行的固态核磁共振实验显示出显著的光谱差异,这些差异被解释为表明()-金刚乙胺比()-金刚乙胺的结合更紧密。然而,尚不清楚这是否与药物结合和抑制作用中的功能差异相关。通过X射线晶体学,我们确定()-和()-金刚乙胺都与M2 WT孔结合,每种对映体的水合作用略有不同。然而,这并没有导致效力或结合动力学的差异,电生理分析中的、、值以及细胞分析中的EC值都显示出相似性。我们得出结论,()-和()-金刚乙胺对映体水合作用的细微差异与药物结合或通道抑制无关。为了进一步探索M2孔的水合作用对结合亲和力的影响,通过巨正则系综分子动力学模拟评估了水结构作为水化学势的函数。最初,结合药物与通道门控His37残基之间的两层有序水分子掩盖了药物的手性。随着化学势变得更不利,药物向下转移到较低的水层,并且相互作用对手性变得更敏感。这些研究表明在新型药物中取代上层水层并特异性识别下层水层的可行性。