Suppr超能文献

通过深度语境化的词向量表示检测形式思维障碍。

Detecting formal thought disorder by deep contextualized word representations.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jaracza 1, 00-378 Warszawa, Poland.

Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jana Kazimierza 5, 01-248 Warszawa, Poland.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2021 Oct;304:114135. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114135. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

Abstract

Computational linguistics has enabled the introduction of objective tools that measure some of the symptoms of schizophrenia, including the coherence of speech associated with formal thought disorder (FTD). Our goal was to investigate whether neural network based utterance embeddings are more accurate in detecting FTD than models based on individual indicators. The present research used a comprehensive Embeddings from Language Models (ELMo) approach to represent interviews with patients suffering from schizophrenia (N=35) and with healthy people (N=35). We compared its results to the approach described by Bedi et al. (2015), referred to here as the coherence model. Evaluations were also performed by a clinician using the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language and Communication (TLC). Using all six TLC questions the ELMo obtained an accuracy of 80% in distinguishing patients from healthy people. Previously used coherence models were less accurate at 70%. The classifying clinician was accurate 74% of the time. Our analysis shows that both ELMo and TLC are sensitive to the symptoms of disorganization in patients. In this study methods using text representations from language models were more accurate than those based solely on the assessment of FTD, and can be used as measures of disordered language that complement human clinical ratings.

摘要

计算语言学已经能够引入客观的工具来衡量精神分裂症的一些症状,包括与形式思维障碍(FTD)相关的言语连贯性。我们的目标是研究基于神经网络的话语嵌入是否比基于单个指标的模型更能准确检测 FTD。本研究使用了一种全面的基于语言模型的嵌入(ELMo)方法来表示与患有精神分裂症的患者(N=35)和健康人(N=35)的访谈。我们将其结果与 Bedi 等人描述的方法(2015 年)进行了比较,这里称为连贯性模型。还由临床医生使用思维、语言和沟通评估量表(TLC)进行了评估。使用所有六个 TLC 问题,ELMo 在区分患者和健康人方面的准确率为 80%。以前使用的连贯性模型的准确率为 70%。分类临床医生的准确率为 74%。我们的分析表明,ELMo 和 TLC 都对患者的紊乱症状敏感。在这项研究中,使用语言模型的文本表示的方法比仅基于 FTD 评估的方法更准确,可以作为补充人类临床评分的紊乱语言的衡量标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验