Neuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center. Department of Sports Medicine and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Jan;22(1):72-86. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1962983. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
Adaptation to military operational stress is a complex physiological response that calls upon the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and immune system, to create a delicate balance between anabolism and catabolism and meet the demands of an ever-changing environment. As such, resilience, the ability to withstand and overcome the negative impact of stress on military performance, is likely grounded in an appropriate biological adaptation to encountered stressors. Neuroendocrine [i.e. cortisol, epinephrine (EPI), norepinephrine (NE), neuropeptide-Y (NPY), and brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF)], inflammatory [i.e. interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-1β, IL-4, IL-10 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α], as well as growth and anabolic [i.e. insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), testosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)] biomarkers independently and interactively function in stress adaptations that are associated with a soldier's physical and psychological performance. In this narrative review, we detail biomarkers across neuroendocrine, inflammatory, and growth stimulating domains to better elucidate the biological basis of a resilient soldier. The findings from the reviewed studies indicate that military readiness and resiliency may be enhanced through better homeostatic control, better regulated inflammatory responses, and balanced anabolic/catabolic processes. It is unlikely that one class of biomarkers is better for assessing physiological resilience. Therefore, a biomarker panel that can account for appropriate balance across these domains may be superior in developing monitoring frameworks. Real-time physiological monitoring to assess biomarkers associated with resilience will be possible pending more sophisticated technologies and provide a field-expedient application for early identification and intervention of at-risk soldiers to improve military resiliency.
适应军事作战应激是一种复杂的生理反应,需要依靠交感神经系统(SNS)、下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴和免疫系统,在合成代谢和分解代谢之间创造一种微妙的平衡,以满足不断变化的环境的需求。因此,韧性,即承受和克服压力对军事表现的负面影响的能力,很可能基于对遇到的应激源的适当生物学适应。神经内分泌[即皮质醇、肾上腺素(EPI)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、神经肽-Y(NPY)和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)]、炎症[即白细胞介素 6(IL-6)、IL-1β、IL-4、IL-10 和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α]以及生长和合成代谢[即胰岛素样生长因子-I(IGF-I)、睾酮和脱氢表雄酮(DHEA)]生物标志物独立且相互作用于与士兵的身体和心理表现相关的应激适应中。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们详细介绍了神经内分泌、炎症和生长刺激领域的生物标志物,以更好地阐明有韧性的士兵的生物学基础。综述研究的结果表明,通过更好的体内平衡控制、更好的调节炎症反应以及平衡的合成代谢/分解代谢过程,可以提高军事准备和韧性。不太可能有一种类别的生物标志物更适合评估生理韧性。因此,一个能够在这些领域内实现适当平衡的生物标志物组合可能在开发监测框架方面更具优势。实时生理监测以评估与韧性相关的生物标志物将成为可能,这取决于更复杂的技术,并为早期识别和干预有风险的士兵提供一种现场应用,以提高军事韧性。