Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
J Health Psychol. 2022 Sep;27(10):2344-2360. doi: 10.1177/13591053211030981. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
Pandemic health threats can cause considerable anxiety, but not all individuals react similarly. To understand the sources of this variability, we applied a theoretical model developed during the H1N1 pandemic of 2009 to quantify relationships among intolerance of uncertainty, stress appraisals, and coping style that predict anxiety about the COVID-19 pandemic. We surveyed 1579 U.S. Amazon Mechanical Turk workers in April 2020. Using structural equation modeling, we found that individuals who were more intolerant of uncertainty reported higher appraisals of threat, stress, and other-control, which predicted higher anxiety when emotion-focused coping was engaged, and lower anxiety when problem-focused coping was engaged. Political affiliation moderated these effects, such that conservatives relied more on self-control and other-control appraisals to mitigate anxiety than independents or liberals. These results show that how people appraise and cope with their stress interacts with political ideology to shape anxiety in the face of a global health threat.
大流行带来的健康威胁可能会引起相当大的焦虑,但并非所有个体的反应都相同。为了了解这种变异性的来源,我们应用了在 2009 年 H1N1 大流行期间开发的理论模型,以量化不确定性容忍度、压力评估和应对方式之间的关系,这些因素预测了对 COVID-19 大流行的焦虑。我们在 2020 年 4 月调查了 1579 名美国亚马逊土耳其机器人工人。通过结构方程建模,我们发现,不确定性容忍度较高的个体报告了更高的威胁、压力和其他控制评估,这预示着当采用情绪聚焦应对方式时会产生更高的焦虑,而当采用问题聚焦应对方式时会产生更低的焦虑。政治派别调节了这些影响,例如,保守派比独立派或自由派更依赖自我控制和其他控制评估来减轻焦虑。这些结果表明,人们如何评估和应对压力与政治意识形态相互作用,从而在面对全球健康威胁时塑造焦虑。