Vanderbilt University, USA.
Vanderbilt University, USA; University of Colorado-Boulder, USA.
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Dec;92:102643. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102643. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Although heightened anxiety and health behavior use (i.e., masking, hand washing) may be viewed as an adaptive response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, it is unclear how the politicization of the pandemic has influenced the trajectory of such responses. Accordingly, the present study examined differences between those that identify as more conservative or liberal in the trajectory of anxiety and health behaviors during the pandemic. This study also examines shifts in this trajectory before and after the presidential election. As part of a larger study, participants (N = 374) completed a symptom survey starting on May 27, 2020 every 2 weeks for a total of 15 timepoints over 30 weeks. The findings showed that more conservative participants reported lower levels of COVID-19 anxiety and less health behavior use compared to more liberal participants. In fact, anxiety levels increased slightly for more liberal participants and decreased slightly for more conservative participants during the pre-election time frame. Health behavior use also decreased more rapidly for conservative participants than for liberal participants during the pre-election time frame. However, COVID-19 anxiety and health behavior use rose sharply and similarly for both liberal and conservative individuals after the election. Importantly, these patterns were independent of state level variability in COVID-19 positivity and death rates. Subsequent analysis also revealed significant relations between COVID-19 anxiety and health behavior use that was slightly stronger among conservatives. Implications of these findings for navigating the influence of political ideology on anxiety-related responses during a public health emergency like the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.
尽管焦虑加剧和健康行为的使用(即掩蔽、洗手)可能被视为对冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行的一种适应反应,但目前尚不清楚大流行的政治化如何影响这些反应的轨迹。因此,本研究考察了在大流行期间焦虑和健康行为轨迹上认同更为保守或自由的个体之间的差异。本研究还检查了在总统选举前后这一轨迹的变化。作为一项更大研究的一部分,参与者(N=374)从 2020 年 5 月 27 日开始,每两周完成一次症状调查,总共在 30 周内完成了 15 次时间点的调查。研究结果表明,与更为自由的参与者相比,更为保守的参与者报告的 COVID-19 焦虑水平较低,健康行为使用较少。事实上,在选举前的时间框架内,更为自由的参与者的焦虑水平略有上升,而更为保守的参与者的焦虑水平略有下降。在选举前的时间框架内,健康行为的使用也更为保守的参与者比更为自由的参与者下降得更快。然而,COVID-19 焦虑和健康行为的使用在选举后急剧上升,且在自由派和保守派个体中上升幅度相似。重要的是,这些模式独立于 COVID-19 阳性率和死亡率在各州的差异。随后的分析还揭示了 COVID-19 焦虑和健康行为使用之间的显著关系,这种关系在保守派中略强。讨论了这些发现对在像 COVID-19 大流行这样的公共卫生紧急事件中应对政治意识形态对焦虑相关反应的影响的意义。