Suppr超能文献

CRISPR分型增强了分型方法的鉴别能力。

CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Typing Methods.

作者信息

Beauruelle Clémence, Treluyer Ludovic, Pastuszka Adeline, Cochard Thierry, Lier Clément, Mereghetti Laurent, Glaser Philippe, Poyart Claire, Lanotte Philippe

机构信息

Département de Bactériologie-Virologie, Hygiène Hospitalière et Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire (CHRU) de Brest, Brest, France.

Inserm, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, Universitè de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2021 Jul 19;12:675597. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.675597. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

We explored the relevance of a Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genotyping tool for typing and we compared this method to current molecular methods [multi locus sequence typing (MLST) and capsular typing]. To this effect, we developed two CRISPR marker schemes (using 94 or 25 markers, respectively). Among the 255 isolates tested, 229 CRISPR profiles were obtained. The 94 and 25 markers made it possible to efficiently separate isolates with a high diversity index (0.9947 and 0.9267, respectively), highlighting a high discriminatory power, superior to that of both capsular typing and MLST (diversity index of 0.9017 for MLST). This method has the advantage of being correlated with MLST [through analysis of the terminal direct repeat (TDR) and ancestral spacers] and to possess a high discriminatory power (through analysis of the leader-end spacers recently acquired, which are the witnesses of genetic mobile elements encountered by the bacteria). Furthermore, this "one-shot" approach presents the benefit of much-reduced time and cost in comparison with MLST. On the basis of these data, we propose that this method could become a reference method for group B (GBS) typing.

摘要

我们探究了一种基于成簇规律间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)的基因分型工具在分型方面的相关性,并将该方法与当前的分子方法[多位点序列分型(MLST)和荚膜分型]进行了比较。为此,我们开发了两种CRISPR标记方案(分别使用94个或25个标记)。在测试的255株分离株中,获得了229种CRISPR图谱。94个和25个标记能够有效地分离具有高多样性指数的分离株(分别为0.9947和0.9267),突出显示了其高鉴别力,优于荚膜分型和MLST(MLST的多样性指数为0.9017)。该方法的优点是与MLST相关[通过对末端直接重复序列(TDR)和祖先间隔序列的分析],并且具有高鉴别力(通过对最近获得的前导端间隔序列的分析,这些间隔序列是细菌遇到的遗传移动元件的见证)。此外,与MLST相比,这种“一次性”方法具有大大减少时间和成本的优势。基于这些数据,我们建议该方法可成为B组链球菌(GBS)分型的参考方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/419b/8328194/c22f4685da8f/fmicb-12-675597-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Typing Methods.
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jul 19;12:675597. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.675597. eCollection 2021.
4
CRISPR: A Useful Genetic Feature to Follow Vaginal Carriage of Group B .
Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct 11;8:1981. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01981. eCollection 2017.
6
Genetic Diversity of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Recovered From Patients in Michigan and Connecticut.
Front Microbiol. 2020 Mar 31;11:529. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00529. eCollection 2020.
7
Evidence of Common Isolates of in Bovines and Humans in Emilia Romagna Region (Northern Italy).
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jun 11;12:673126. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.673126. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of CRISPR typing and conventional molecular methods for distinguishing Laribacter hongkongensis isolates from fish, frogs and humans.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2024 Sep 16;422:110824. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110824. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
10
Molecular epidemiology of invasive and non-invasive group B Streptococcus circulating in Serbia.
Int J Med Microbiol. 2019 Jan;309(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Virulence and pathogenicity of group B : Virulence factors and their roles in perinatal infection.
Virulence. 2025 Dec;16(1):2451173. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2025.2451173. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Determination of Technological Properties and CRISPR Profiles of Isolates Obtained from Local Yogurt Samples.
Microorganisms. 2024 Nov 25;12(12):2428. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122428.
5
Distribution, Diversity and Roles of CRISPR-Cas Systems in Human and Animal Pathogenic Streptococci.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jan 31;13:828031. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.828031. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Invasive group B Streptococcus infections in non-pregnant adults: a retrospective study, France, 2007-2019.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jan;27(1):129.e1-129.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.037. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
Development and Application of a Prophage Integrase Typing Scheme for Group B .
Front Microbiol. 2020 Aug 31;11:1993. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01993. eCollection 2020.
4
Group B streptococcus vaccines: one step further.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):158-160. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30451-5. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
The Epidemiology of Invasive Group B in Denmark From 2005 to 2018.
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 10;8:40. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00040. eCollection 2020.
6
Whole-Genome Sequencing Confirms the Coexistence of Different Colonizing Group B Isolates Underscored by CRISPR Typing.
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2020 Jan 30;9(5):e01359-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01359-19.
8
Molecular epidemiology of invasive and non-invasive group B Streptococcus circulating in Serbia.
Int J Med Microbiol. 2019 Jan;309(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验