J Travel Med. 2022 Jan 17;29(1). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab120.
Giardiasis is one of the most common human protozoal infections worldwide. First-line therapy of giardiasis includes nitroimidazole antibiotics. However, treatment failure with nitroimidazoles is increasingly reported, with up to 45% of patients not responding to initial treatment. There is no clear consensus on the approach to the management of nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature on pharmacotherapy for nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis.
We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the optimal management strategies for nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis. We searched Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library using the following search terms 'Giardia' AND 'treatment failure' OR 'refractory giardia' OR 'resistant giardia' with date limits of 1 January 1970 to 30 June 2021. We included all reports on humans, which described clinical outcomes of individuals with treatment refractory giardiasis, including case series and case reports. A descriptive synthesis of the data was conducted with pooling of data for interventions.
Included in this review were five prospective studies, three retrospective studies, seven case series and nine case reports. Across these reports, a wide heterogeneity of treatment regimens was employed, including retreatment with an alternative nitroimidazole, combination therapy with a nitroimidazole and another agent and monotherapy with non-nitroimidazole regimens, including quinacrine, paromomycin and nitazoxanide. Retreatment with a nitroimidazole was not an effective therapy for refractory giardiasis. However, treatment with a nitroimidazole in combination with albendazole had a cure rate of 66.9%. In the included studies, quinacrine monotherapy was administered to a total of 179 patients, with a clinical cure rate of 88.8%. Overall, quinacrine was fairly well tolerated.
Reports on the treatment of nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis demonstrate a heterogeneous approach to treatment. Of these, quinacrine appeared to be highly effective, though more data on its safety are needed.
贾第虫病是全球最常见的人类原生动物感染之一。贾第虫病的一线治疗包括硝基咪唑类抗生素。然而,越来越多的报道表明硝基咪唑类药物治疗失败,多达 45%的患者对初始治疗无反应。对于硝基咪唑类药物难治性贾第虫病的处理方法尚无明确共识。本系统评价旨在总结硝基咪唑类药物难治性贾第虫病的药物治疗文献。
我们对文献进行了系统评价,以确定硝基咪唑类药物难治性贾第虫病的最佳治疗策略。我们使用以下搜索词在 Pubmed/MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行了系统评价:“贾第虫”和“治疗失败”或“难治性贾第虫病”或“耐药性贾第虫病”,时间限制为 1970 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日。我们纳入了所有描述治疗难治性贾第虫病患者临床结局的报告,包括病例系列和病例报告。对数据进行描述性综合,并对干预措施进行数据合并。
本综述包括五项前瞻性研究、三项回顾性研究、七项病例系列研究和九项病例报告。在这些报告中,治疗方案存在很大的异质性,包括用替代硝基咪唑类药物进行再治疗、用硝基咪唑类药物联合另一种药物进行联合治疗以及用非硝基咪唑类药物(包括奎宁、巴龙霉素和硝唑尼特)进行单药治疗。用硝基咪唑类药物再治疗对于难治性贾第虫病不是有效的治疗方法。然而,用硝基咪唑类药物联合阿苯达唑治疗的治愈率为 66.9%。在纳入的研究中,奎宁单药治疗共 179 例患者,临床治愈率为 88.8%。总的来说,奎宁的耐受性相当好。
关于硝基咪唑类药物难治性贾第虫病治疗的报告表明,治疗方法存在很大的异质性。在这些报告中,奎宁似乎非常有效,尽管需要更多关于其安全性的数据。