Sanna Elisabetta, Tanca Luciana, Cherchi Cristina, Gramignano Giulia, Oppi Sara, Chiai Maria Gloria, Macciò Antonio, Madeddu Clelia
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, A. Businco Hospital, ARNAS G. Brotzu, 09100 Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Medical Oncology, A. Businco Hospital, ARNAS G. Brotzu, 09100 Cagliari, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;11(7):1298. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071298.
Since chronic inflammation is associated with ovarian cancer growth and progression, some clinical studies have assessed the association between the pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the prognosis of ovarian cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the dynamic behavior of the NLR during the course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with high grade serous (HGS) advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and assess its correlation with clinical response, progression free survival (PFS) and changes in other inflammatory indexes. We performed a prospective observational study on 161 patients who underwent NACT at the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS G. Brotzu, Cagliari, between 2009 and 2019. NLR was evaluated before starting and after three cycles of NACT. Based on response after three cycles of NACT, patients were divided into two groups: responsive and non-responsive. The primary endpoint was to assess the predictive role of NLR by comparing the responsive and non-responsive patients at baseline and after three cycles of NACT. Secondary endpoints were (a) to correlate NLR with other inflammation markers (CRP, fibrinogen, ferritin, IL-6), albumin, and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) with NLR at baseline and after NACT; (b) to assess the association between NLR and PFS. We found that the NLR value at baseline was not associated with response to NACT, while a decrease in NLR after three cycles was correlated with a better response to NACT. Also, values of CRP, IL-6, ferritin, and mGPS after three cycles of NACT (but not at baseline) were significantly associated with clinical response. Moreover, we found that patients with a low NLR value after 3 cycles of NACT, but not at baseline, had a significantly higher PFS than patients with high NLR after 3 cycles of NACT. In conclusion, NLR change during treatment could serve as a predictive marker of response to NACT in patients with HGS advanced ovarian cancer. This allows for the early identification of non-responsive patients who will need treatment remodeling.
由于慢性炎症与卵巢癌的生长和进展相关,一些临床研究评估了治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与卵巢癌预后之间的关联。本研究的目的是评估高级别浆液性(HGS)晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者在新辅助化疗(NACT)过程中NLR的动态变化,并评估其与临床反应、无进展生存期(PFS)以及其他炎症指标变化的相关性。我们对2009年至2019年间在卡利亚里ARNAS G. Brotzu妇科肿瘤学部门接受NACT的161例患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。在开始NACT前和三个周期后评估NLR。根据三个周期NACT后的反应,将患者分为两组:反应组和无反应组。主要终点是通过比较基线时和三个周期NACT后的反应组和无反应组患者来评估NLR的预测作用。次要终点是:(a)将基线时和NACT后NLR与其他炎症标志物(CRP、纤维蛋白原、铁蛋白、IL-6)、白蛋白以及改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)进行相关性分析;(b)评估NLR与PFS之间的关联。我们发现基线时的NLR值与NACT反应无关,而三个周期后NLR的降低与对NACT的更好反应相关。此外,三个周期NACT后(而非基线时)的CRP、IL-6、铁蛋白和mGPS值与临床反应显著相关。而且,我们发现三个周期NACT后NLR值低(而非基线时)的患者比三个周期NACT后NLR值高的患者PFS显著更高。总之,治疗期间NLR的变化可作为HGS晚期卵巢癌患者对NACT反应的预测标志物。这有助于早期识别需要调整治疗方案的无反应患者。