Suppr超能文献

确定支持水产食品对粮食和营养安全做出贡献的政策最佳实践。

Identifying Policy Best-Practices to Support the Contribution of Aquatic Foods to Food and Nutrition Security.

作者信息

Farmery Anna K, White Amy, Allison Edward H

机构信息

Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia.

Impacto, Melbourne 3000, Australia.

出版信息

Foods. 2021 Jul 8;10(7):1589. doi: 10.3390/foods10071589.

Abstract

The relationship between aquatic foods and food nutrition and security is increasingly recognised in policy and practice, yet many governance instruments do not acknowledge or support this important connection. The most effective policy approaches to support the link between these sectors, or 'best practices' are currently unknown. We reviewed relevant governance instruments from multiple countries to identify how these instruments linked fisheries, aquaculture and food security and nutrition, including the policy framing and evidence of political commitment. Of the documents connecting the sectors (65%), the majority did so in the context of developing the fisheries/aquaculture sector to increase aquatic food availability and/or access (51%), followed by developing the fisheries/aquaculture sector as a livelihoods approach to indirectly improve food security (33%), for example, through income generation. Sectoral links established in the context of nutrition-sensitive approaches to fisheries and aquaculture were less common (5%). Almost one third (29%) of instruments supported the connection between aquatic foods and food security and nutrition across three or more different contexts relevant to food security or food systems, while 12% indicated a very high level of commitment. We recommend some key attributes for future policy development to help build coherence between sectors and to help frame coherent food system-based policies.

摘要

水生食物与粮食营养和安全之间的关系在政策和实践中日益得到认可,但许多治理手段并未承认或支持这一重要联系。目前尚不清楚支持这些部门之间联系的最有效政策方法,即“最佳实践”。我们审查了多个国家的相关治理手段,以确定这些手段如何将渔业、水产养殖与粮食安全和营养联系起来,包括政策框架和政治承诺的证据。在将这些部门联系起来的文件中(占65%),大多数是在发展渔业/水产养殖部门以增加水生食物供应和/或获取机会的背景下进行联系的(占51%),其次是将渔业/水产养殖部门作为一种生计方式来间接改善粮食安全(占33%),例如通过创收。在对渔业和水产养殖采取营养敏感型方法的背景下建立的部门联系则不太常见(占5%)。近三分之一(29%)的手段支持在与粮食安全或粮食系统相关的三个或更多不同背景下建立水生食物与粮食安全和营养之间的联系,而12%的手段表明有非常高的承诺水平。我们建议未来政策制定应具备一些关键属性,以帮助建立部门间的连贯性,并帮助制定基于连贯粮食系统的政策。

相似文献

2
A Decision Framework for Selecting Critically Important Nutrients from Aquatic Foods.从水产食物中选择极重要营养素的决策框架。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2023 Jun;10(2):172-183. doi: 10.1007/s40572-023-00397-5. Epub 2023 May 25.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate.保护全球海洋生物多样性、粮食和气候。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7854):397-402. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Farming fish in the sea will not nourish the world.在海里养殖鱼类无法养活世界。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 16;11(1):5804. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19679-9.
5
Food Insecurity and Socioeconomic Disadvantage in Australia.澳大利亚的食物不安全与社会经济劣势
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 15;17(2):559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020559.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验