Gautama Pushya A
Consciousness Studies Programme, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bengaluru 560012, India; Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):556-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2021.06.012. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
Currently, there is a paucity of clinical trial designs that comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of most complementary and alternative systems of medicine (CAMs) like Ayurveda. Several factors such as complex interventions, individualized therapy, etc., make designing Ayurveda clinical trials challenging. The prevalent randomized control trial (RCT) designs largely involve symptomatology/pathology-based recruitment and standardized interventions in carefully monitored trial environments. The present paper critically reviews the suitability of the dominant RCT model to Ayurveda and argues for newer, more sensitive trial models including modified RCTs and other clinical trial designs. It also explores the merits of a non-hierarchical approach to clinical evidence generation.
目前,缺乏全面评估大多数补充和替代医学体系(如阿育吠陀医学)疗效的临床试验设计。复杂干预、个体化治疗等多种因素使得设计阿育吠陀医学临床试验具有挑战性。普遍采用的随机对照试验(RCT)设计主要涉及基于症状学/病理学的招募以及在严格监测的试验环境中的标准化干预。本文批判性地审视了主流RCT模型对阿育吠陀医学的适用性,并主张采用更新的、更敏感的试验模型,包括改良的RCT和其他临床试验设计。它还探讨了采用非等级制方法生成临床证据的优点。