• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

呼吁变革:应对职场粗言秽语的退出、发声、忠诚和忽视(EVLN)。

A call for transformation: Exit, Voice, Loyalty and Neglect (EVLN) in response to workplace incivility.

机构信息

School of Humanities, Kinneret Academic College, Jordan Valley, Israel.

出版信息

Work. 2021;69(4):1271-1282. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213548.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-213548
PMID:34366309
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interrelations between incivility and its precursors or consequences, as well as the role of these interrelations in employees' reactions to incivility are still poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to assess different reactions to workplace incivility while identifying specific and individual-based appraisals and emotions associated with these reactions.

METHOD

A qualitative research approach using semi-structured in-depth interviews, with a sample of 42 employees in a beverage manufacturing corporation in Israel to capture employees' voices regarding their incivility experiences.

RESULTS

Analysis of the interviews indicated four reaction-categories: (1) Exit; (2) Voice; (3) Loyalty; and (4) Neglect, in line with the theoretical EVLN model for describing reactions to stressful conditions. In particular, the interviews revealed a dynamic reaction process and suggested that intentionality of reaction provides a third, new dimension. Additionally, an underlying emotional process rooted in appraisals and aroused emotions was evident in each of the reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Organizations that wish to reduce incivility events may wish to examine the emotions of targets of incivility, explore the underlying appraisals associated with these emotions, and be mindful of the dynamic and highly individual reaction processes involved.

摘要

背景

不文明行为及其前因或后果之间的相互关系,以及这些相互关系在员工对不文明行为的反应中的作用,仍知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在评估对工作场所不文明行为的不同反应,同时确定与这些反应相关的具体的、基于个体的评价和情绪。

方法

采用半结构式深度访谈的定性研究方法,对以色列一家饮料制造公司的 42 名员工进行了样本调查,以了解员工对不文明行为的看法。

结果

对访谈的分析表明,存在四种反应类别:(1)退出;(2)发声;(3)忠诚;(4)忽视,与描述对压力条件的反应的理论 EVLN 模型一致。特别是,访谈揭示了一个动态的反应过程,并表明反应的意图提供了第三个新的维度。此外,在每种反应中都存在一个基于评价和引发情绪的潜在情绪过程。

结论

希望减少不文明事件的组织可能希望检查不文明行为目标的情绪,探索与这些情绪相关的潜在评价,并注意涉及的动态和高度个体化的反应过程。

相似文献

1
A call for transformation: Exit, Voice, Loyalty and Neglect (EVLN) in response to workplace incivility.呼吁变革:应对职场粗言秽语的退出、发声、忠诚和忽视(EVLN)。
Work. 2021;69(4):1271-1282. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213548.
2
The role of appraisals and emotions in understanding experiences of workplace incivility.评估和情绪在理解职场不文明行为体验中的作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Jan;18(1):87-105. doi: 10.1037/a0030987.
3
A sorrow halved? A daily diary study on talking about experienced workplace incivility and next-morning negative affect.悲伤减半?一项关于谈论工作场所不文明经历与次日负面影响的日常日记研究。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Oct;23(4):568-583. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000100. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
When Do Service Employees Suffer More from Job Insecurity? The Moderating Role of Coworker and Customer Incivility.服务员工何时会因工作不安而遭受更多痛苦?同事和顾客无礼行为的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 11;16(7):1298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071298.
5
Burning out? Watch your own incivility and the emotions you spread.疲惫不堪?留意自身的无礼行为以及你所传递的情绪。
Work. 2019;64(4):671-683. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193029.
6
Mistreatment from Multiple Sources: Interaction Effects of Abusive Supervision, Coworker Incivility, and Customer Incivility on Work Outcomes.遭受多方虐待:辱骂型主管行为、同事无礼行为和顾客无礼行为对工作结果的交互影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 18;18(10):5377. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105377.
7
Work-Related Identity Discrepancy and Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Role of Emotional Exhaustion and Supervisor Incivility.工作相关身份差异与反生产工作行为:情绪耗竭和主管粗言秽语的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 9;17(16):5747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165747.
8
The Relationship between Workplace Incivility and Helping Behavior: Roles of Job Dissatisfaction and Political Skill.工作场所粗言秽语与助人行为的关系:工作不满和政治技能的作用。
J Psychol. 2019;153(5):507-527. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2019.1567453. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
9
Target Meaning-Making of Workplace Incivility Based on Perceived Personality Similarity with Perpetrators.基于与施动者感知人格相似性的职场粗言秽语目标意义建构。
J Psychol. 2018;152(7):474-496. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2018.1481819. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
10
Predicting frontline employees' emotional labor after suffering customer incivility: A job passion perspective.预测遭受顾客无礼对待后一线员工的情绪劳动:从工作激情的角度。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Apr;244:104178. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104178. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Targets' Coping Responses to Workplace Bullying with Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Tolerance: A Two-Phased Study of Faculty in Higher Education Institutions.目标人群对工作场所欺凌的应对策略——以知觉到的组织容忍度为调节变量:高等教育机构教师的两阶段研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 7;20(2):1083. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021083.
2
Health and Risk Behaviors of Bystanders: An Integrative Theoretical Model of Bystanders' Reactions to Mistreatment.旁观者的健康和风险行为:旁观者对虐待反应的综合理论模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 22;18(11):5552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115552.