• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

民粹主义者是对自身缺乏安全感还是对自己的国家缺乏安全感?政治态度与经济认知。

Are Populists Insecure About Themselves or About Their Country? Political Attitudes and Economic Perceptions.

作者信息

Watson Barry, Law Stephen, Osberg Lars

机构信息

University of New Brunswick, Saint John, Canada.

Mount Allison University, Sackville, Canada.

出版信息

Soc Indic Res. 2022;159(2):667-705. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02767-8. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11205-021-02767-8
PMID:34366546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8332002/
Abstract

We investigate whether greater economic insecurity increases distrust in government and fosters authoritarian politics. Using the 2016 American National Election Studies dataset, we build on the literature regarding "egotropic" and "sociotropic" economic concerns to distinguish between "micro" insecurity (perceived insecurity regarding the individual's own personal economic well-being), and "macro" insecurity (negative expectations concerning the macro economy). Our results suggest micro insecurity is not significantly correlated with attitudinal differences, but macro-level insecurity is associated with increased levels of political distrust, accompanied by greater authoritarianism. Greater macro-level insecurity is also associated with more negative feelings toward "out-groups" (e.g. Muslims, the LGBTQ+ community, feminists, immigrants) and was a key predictor in reduced affinity for Hillary Clinton and the rise in support for Donald Trump. Results are robust to controls for political affiliation and aggregate macroeconomic indicators, suggesting that rising levels of income inequality and weakening social safety nets increase political polarization and encourage xenophobia, racism, and homophobia.

摘要

我们研究了更大程度的经济不安全感是否会增加对政府的不信任并助长威权政治。利用2016年美国全国选举研究数据集,我们以关于“自我导向型”和“社会导向型”经济担忧的文献为基础,区分“微观”不安全感(对个人自身经济福祉的感知不安全感)和“宏观”不安全感(对宏观经济的负面预期)。我们的结果表明,微观不安全感与态度差异没有显著相关性,但宏观层面的不安全感与政治不信任程度的增加有关,同时伴随着更强的威权主义。更大的宏观层面不安全感还与对“外群体”(如穆斯林、 LGBTQ+群体、女权主义者、移民)的更多负面情绪有关,并且是对希拉里·克林顿的好感度降低以及对唐纳德·特朗普的支持率上升的关键预测因素。这些结果在对政治派别和总体宏观经济指标进行控制后依然稳健,表明收入不平等加剧和社会安全网削弱会加剧政治两极分化,并助长仇外心理、种族主义和恐同心理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/5a4a3141dd24/11205_2021_2767_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/3352f872c1a5/11205_2021_2767_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/5c39b727d91b/11205_2021_2767_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/71776c182477/11205_2021_2767_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/fe931f22759f/11205_2021_2767_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/c8f81cdd9121/11205_2021_2767_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/71f0ed26e96d/11205_2021_2767_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/5a4a3141dd24/11205_2021_2767_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/3352f872c1a5/11205_2021_2767_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/5c39b727d91b/11205_2021_2767_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/71776c182477/11205_2021_2767_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/fe931f22759f/11205_2021_2767_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/c8f81cdd9121/11205_2021_2767_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/71f0ed26e96d/11205_2021_2767_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee73/8332002/5a4a3141dd24/11205_2021_2767_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Are Populists Insecure About Themselves or About Their Country? Political Attitudes and Economic Perceptions.民粹主义者是对自身缺乏安全感还是对自己的国家缺乏安全感?政治态度与经济认知。
Soc Indic Res. 2022;159(2):667-705. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02767-8. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
2
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
3
Handedness and the 2016 U.S. Primaries: consistent handedness predicts support for Donald Trump among republicans, but gender predicts support for Hillary Clinton among democrats.惯用手和 2016 年美国总统初选:惯用右手的人更支持共和党候选人唐纳德·特朗普,但女性更支持民主党候选人希拉里·克林顿。
Laterality. 2020 Nov;25(6):641-653. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2020.1810061. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Sexism, racism, and nationalism: Factors associated with the 2016 U.S. presidential election results?性别歧视、种族主义和民族主义:与 2016 年美国总统选举结果相关的因素?
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 9;15(3):e0229432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229432. eCollection 2020.
5
Sociotropic and Personal Threats and Authoritarian Reactions During COVID-19.新冠疫情期间的社交威胁和人身威胁与威权反应
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Mar;49(3):447-459. doi: 10.1177/01461672211070923. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
They Saw a Debate: Political Polarization Is Associated with Greater Multivariate Neural Synchrony When Viewing the Opposing Candidate Speak.他们观察到一场辩论:当观看对立候选人发言时,政治两极分化与更大的多元神经同步性相关。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Dec 1;35(1):60-73. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01888.
7
Micro-Expressions of Fear During the 2016 Presidential Campaign Trail: Their Influence on Trait Perceptions of Donald Trump.2016年总统竞选期间恐惧的微表情:它们对唐纳德·特朗普特质认知的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 2;12:608483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608483. eCollection 2021.
8
Differentiating Between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Voters Using Facets of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social-Dominance Orientation.利用右翼威权主义和社会支配取向的不同方面区分唐纳德·特朗普和希拉里·克林顿的选民
Psychol Rep. 2017 Jun;120(3):364-373. doi: 10.1177/0033294117697089. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
9
Associations of political orientation, xenophobia, right-wing authoritarianism, and concern of COVID-19: Cognitive responses to an actual pathogen threat.政治倾向、仇外心理、右翼威权主义与对新冠疫情的担忧之间的关联:对实际病原体威胁的认知反应。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Nov;182:111081. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111081. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
10
The job insecurity of others: On the role of perceived national job insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic.他人的工作不安全感:论新冠疫情期间感知到的国家工作不安全感的作用。
Econ Ind Democr. 2023 May;44(2):385-409. doi: 10.1177/0143831X221076176. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote.是地位威胁而非经济困难,解释了 2016 年总统大选。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 8;115(19):E4330-E4339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718155115. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
2
The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right.社会地位的政治学:民粹右翼的经济和文化根源。
Br J Sociol. 2017 Nov;68 Suppl 1:S57-S84. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12319.
3
Healing and/or breaking? The mental health implications of repeated economic insecurity.治愈还是破坏?反复的经济不安全感对心理健康的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;188:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.042. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
4
Chronic stress and obesity: a new view of "comfort food".慢性压力与肥胖:对“安慰食品”的新看法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 30;100(20):11696-701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934666100. Epub 2003 Sep 15.
5
Psychological distress as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Whitehall II Study.怀特霍尔二期研究中,心理困扰作为冠心病的一个风险因素。
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):248-55. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.248.
6
Loneliness in relation to suicide ideation and parasuicide: a population-wide study.孤独与自杀意念及准自杀行为的关系:一项全人群研究。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2001 Spring;31(1):32-40. doi: 10.1521/suli.31.1.32.21312.