Saito Kazuki, Six Johan, Komatsu Shota, Snapp Sieglinde, Rosenstock Todd, Arouna Aminou, Cole Steven, Taulya Godfrey, Vanlauwe Bernard
Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2551, Bouaké 01, Cote d'Ivoire.
Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Field Crops Res. 2021 Aug 1;270:108193. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108193.
Meeting future global staple crop demand requires continual productivity improvement. Many performance indicators have been proposed to track and measure the increase in productivity while minimizing environmental degradation. However, their use has lagged behind theory, and has not been uniform across crops in different geographies. The consequence is an uneven understanding of opportunities for sustainable intensification. Simple but robust key performance indicators (KPIs) are needed to standardize knowledge across crops and geographies. This paper defines a new term 'agronomic gain' based on an improvement in KPIs, including productivity, resource use efficiencies, and soil health that a specific single or combination of agronomic practices delivers under certain environmental conditions. We apply the concept of agronomic gain to the different stages of science-based agronomic innovations and provide a description of different approaches used to assess agronomic gain including yield gap assessment, meta-data analysis, on-station and on-farm studies, impact assessment, panel studies, and use of subnational and national statistics for assessing KPIs at different stages. We mainly focus on studies on rice in sub-Saharan Africa, where large yield gaps exist. Rice is one of the most important staple food crops and plays an essential role in food security in this region. Our analysis identifies major challenges in the assessment of agronomic gain, including differentiating agronomic gain from genetic gain, unreliable in-person interviews, and assessment of some KPIs at a larger scale. To overcome these challenges, we suggest to (i) conduct multi-environment trials for assessing variety × agronomic practice × environment interaction on KPIs, and (ii) develop novel approaches for assessing KPIs, through development of indirect methods using remote-sensing technology, mobile devices for systematized site characterization, and establishment of empirical relationships among KPIs or between agronomic practices and KPIs.
满足未来全球主要粮食作物需求需要持续提高生产力。人们提出了许多性能指标来跟踪和衡量生产力的提高,同时尽量减少环境退化。然而,这些指标的应用落后于理论,而且在不同地区的作物上应用并不统一。结果是对可持续集约化机会的理解参差不齐。需要简单而可靠的关键绩效指标(KPI)来规范不同作物和地区的知识。本文基于关键绩效指标的改进定义了一个新术语“农艺增益”,包括特定单一或组合农艺措施在特定环境条件下所带来的生产力、资源利用效率和土壤健康方面的提升。我们将农艺增益的概念应用于基于科学的农艺创新的不同阶段,并描述了用于评估农艺增益的不同方法,包括产量差距评估、元数据分析、试验站和农场研究、影响评估、小组研究以及利用次国家和国家统计数据在不同阶段评估关键绩效指标。我们主要关注撒哈拉以南非洲地区水稻的研究,该地区存在较大的产量差距。水稻是最重要的主食作物之一,在该地区的粮食安全中发挥着至关重要的作用。我们的分析确定了评估农艺增益的主要挑战,包括区分农艺增益和遗传增益、不可靠的个人访谈以及在更大规模上评估一些关键绩效指标。为了克服这些挑战,我们建议:(i)进行多环境试验,以评估品种×农艺措施×环境对关键绩效指标的相互作用;(ii)通过开发间接方法来评估关键绩效指标,这些间接方法包括利用遥感技术、用于系统化实地特征描述的移动设备以及建立关键绩效指标之间或农艺措施与关键绩效指标之间的经验关系。