Emran Shah-Al, Krupnik Timothy J, Aravindakshan Sreejith, Kumar Virender, Pittelkow Cameron M
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL USA.
Sustainable Impact Platform, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Laguna Philippines.
Agron Sustain Dev. 2022;42(4):78. doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00795-3. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
Diversification of smallholder rice-based cropping systems has the potential to increase cropping system intensity and boost food security. However, impacts on resource use efficiencies (e.g., nutrients, energy, and labor) remain poorly understood, highlighting the need to quantify synergies and trade-offs among different sustainability indicators under on-farm conditions. In southern coastal Bangladesh, season rice is characterized by low inputs and low productivity. We evaluated the farm-level impacts of cropping system intensification (adding irrigated season rice) and diversification (adding chili, groundnut, mungbean, or lathyrus) on seven performance indicators (rice equivalent yield, energy efficiency, partial nitrogen productivity, partial potassium productivity, partial greenhouse gas footprint, benefit-cost ratio, and hired labor energy productivity) based on a comprehensive survey of 501 households. Indicators were combined into a multi-criteria performance index, and their scope for improvement was calculated by comparing an individual farmer's performance to top-performing farmers (highest 20%). Results indicate that the baseline system (single-crop season rice) was the least productive, while double cropped systems increased rice equivalent yield 72-217%. Despite gains in productivity, higher cropping intensity reduced resource use efficiencies due to higher inputs of fertilizer and energy, which also increased production costs, particularly for season rice. However, trade-offs were smaller for diversified systems including legumes, largely owing to lower N fertilizer inputs. season rice had the highest multi-criteria performance index, followed by systems with mungbean and lathyrus, indicating the latter are promising options to boost food production and profitability without compromising sustainability. Large gaps between individual and top-performing farmers existed for each indicator, suggesting significant scope for improvement. By targeting indicators contributing most to the multi-criteria performance index (partial nitrogen productivity, energy efficiency, hired labor energy productivity), results suggest further sustainability gains can be achieved through future field research studies focused on optimizing management within diversified systems.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13593-022-00795-3.
小农水稻种植系统的多样化有潜力提高种植系统强度并增强粮食安全。然而,对资源利用效率(如养分、能源和劳动力)的影响仍知之甚少,这凸显了在农场条件下量化不同可持续性指标之间协同效应和权衡取舍的必要性。在孟加拉国南部沿海地区,季稻的特点是投入低、产量低。我们基于对501户家庭的全面调查,评估了种植系统集约化(添加灌溉季稻)和多样化(添加辣椒、花生、绿豆或山黧豆)对七个绩效指标(水稻当量产量、能源效率、偏氮生产率、偏钾生产率、偏温室气体足迹、效益成本比和雇佣劳动力能源生产率)的农场层面影响。这些指标被整合为一个多标准绩效指数,并通过将个体农户的表现与表现最佳的农户(前20%)进行比较来计算其改进空间。结果表明,基线系统(单季季稻)生产力最低,而双季种植系统使水稻当量产量提高了72 - 217%。尽管生产力有所提高,但更高的种植强度由于肥料和能源投入增加而降低了资源利用效率,这也增加了生产成本,特别是季稻的成本。然而,包括豆类作物的多样化系统的权衡取舍较小,这主要是由于氮肥投入较低。季稻的多标准绩效指数最高,其次是种植绿豆和山黧豆的系统,这表明后两者是在不损害可持续性的情况下提高粮食产量和盈利能力的有前景选择。每个指标在个体农户和表现最佳农户之间存在很大差距,这表明有很大的改进空间。通过针对对多标准绩效指数贡献最大的指标(偏氮生产率、能源效率、雇佣劳动力能源生产率),结果表明通过未来专注于优化多样化系统内管理的田间研究可以实现进一步的可持续性提升。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s13593 - 022 - 00795 - 3获取的补充材料。