Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Aug 9;15(8):e0009603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009603. eCollection 2021 Aug.
The COVID-19 pandemic has induced unprecedented reductions in human mobility and social contacts throughout the world. Because dengue virus (DENV) transmission is strongly driven by human mobility, behavioral changes associated with the pandemic have been hypothesized to impact dengue incidence. By discouraging human contact, COVID-19 control measures have also disrupted dengue vector control interventions, the most effective of which require entry into homes. We sought to investigate how and why dengue incidence could differ under a lockdown scenario with a proportion of the population sheltered at home.
METHODOLOGY & PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used an agent-based model with a realistic treatment of human mobility and vector control. We found that a lockdown in which 70% of the population sheltered at home and which occurred in a season when a new serotype invaded could lead to a small average increase in cumulative DENV infections of up to 10%, depending on the time of year lockdown occurred. Lockdown had a more pronounced effect on the spatial distribution of DENV infections, with higher incidence under lockdown in regions with higher mosquito abundance. Transmission was also more focused in homes following lockdown. The proportion of people infected in their own home rose from 54% under normal conditions to 66% under lockdown, and the household secondary attack rate rose from 0.109 to 0.128, a 17% increase. When we considered that lockdown measures could disrupt regular, city-wide vector control campaigns, the increase in incidence was more pronounced than with lockdown alone, especially if lockdown occurred at the optimal time for vector control.
CONCLUSIONS & SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate that an unintended outcome of lockdown measures may be to adversely alter the epidemiology of dengue. This observation has important implications for an improved understanding of dengue epidemiology and effective application of dengue vector control. When coordinating public health responses during a syndemic, it is important to monitor multiple infections and understand that an intervention against one disease may exacerbate another.
COVID-19 大流行导致全球范围内人类流动性和社会接触空前减少。由于登革热病毒(DENV)传播强烈依赖于人类流动性,因此人们假设与大流行相关的行为变化会影响登革热的发病率。COVID-19 控制措施通过阻止人际接触,也破坏了登革热媒介控制干预措施,而最有效的干预措施需要进入家庭。我们试图研究在有一定比例的人口在家中避难的封锁情况下,登革热发病率是如何以及为何会有所不同。
我们使用了一个具有现实人类流动性和媒介控制处理的基于代理的模型。我们发现,如果 70%的人口在家中避难的封锁发生在新血清型入侵的季节,可能会导致累积 DENV 感染的平均增加 10%,具体取决于封锁发生的时间。封锁对 DENV 感染的空间分布有更明显的影响,在蚊子丰度较高的地区,封锁下的发病率更高。封锁后,传播也更加集中在家庭中。在正常情况下,感染人数占自身家庭的 54%,而在封锁期间则上升到 66%,家庭二次攻击率从 0.109 上升到 0.128,增加了 17%。当我们考虑到封锁措施可能会破坏定期的全市范围的媒介控制运动时,发病率的增加比仅封锁更为明显,尤其是如果封锁发生在媒介控制的最佳时间。
我们的结果表明,封锁措施的一个意外后果可能是不利地改变登革热的流行病学。这一观察结果对更好地理解登革热流行病学和有效应用登革热媒介控制具有重要意义。在协同应对综合征期间的公共卫生反应时,重要的是要监测多种感染,并了解针对一种疾病的干预措施可能会加剧另一种疾病。