Department Polytechnic of Engineering and Architecture (DPIA), University of Udine, Via del Cotonificio 108, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 1;798:149283. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149283. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
Despite providing important ecological functions, seagrass accumulation causes environmental and economic issues, including eutrophication and tourism reduction. Nowadays, seagrass wrack is commonly removed from the beaches and landfilled, which is considered the least desirable practice according to the European Union (EU) Waste Framework Directive. In this study, different management strategies for seagrass valorisation, including anaerobic digestion (AD), composting and ecological restoration, were considered using a life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective. The aim of the work was to evaluate more ecological and economic alternatives to landfill and to provide a robust evaluation method for public and private companies. An economic assessment was subsequently conducted, considering both direct and indirect impacts with a life cycle costing (LCC) approach. A selected beach located in the Northeast Mediterranean Sea was considered as a relevant case-study. The environmental impacts of the seagrass management scenarios were evaluated with the method ReCiPe 2016H, using both midpoint and endpoint levels. LCA results showed that ecological restoration and AD were the best alternatives in terms of environmental performances because of biogas production used as a renewable energy source. The impacts of the alternative management strategies were significantly lower than the current landfill strategy, -70% considering the categories of human health, ecosystems and resources, and -95% considering global warming potential category. The LCC analysis proved that composting was the best alternative (NPV > 1.27 M€), due to lower operating costs and higher fertilizer value. The obtained results can help beach management companies and public administrations to select the best operational strategies to reduce the environmental and economic impact of seagrass collection and treatment.
尽管海草的积累提供了重要的生态功能,但它也会导致环境和经济问题,包括富营养化和旅游业减少。如今,海草残骸通常从海滩上清除并填埋,根据欧盟(EU)废物框架指令,这被认为是最不可取的做法。在这项研究中,从生命周期评估(LCA)的角度考虑了海草增值的不同管理策略,包括厌氧消化(AD)、堆肥和生态恢复。这项工作的目的是评估比填埋更具生态和经济意义的替代方案,并为公共和私营公司提供一种稳健的评估方法。随后进行了经济评估,考虑了生命周期成本(LCC)方法的直接和间接影响。选择了位于地中海东北部的一个海滩作为相关案例研究。使用 ReCiPe 2016H 方法,在中间点和终点两个层面上评估了海草管理方案的环境影响。LCA 结果表明,生态恢复和 AD 在环境性能方面是最好的替代方案,因为沼气生产可用作可再生能源。替代管理策略的影响明显低于当前的填埋策略,在人类健康、生态系统和资源类别中降低了 70%,在全球变暖潜力类别中降低了 95%。LCC 分析证明,堆肥是最佳选择(NPV>1.27 欧元),因为运营成本更低,肥料价值更高。研究结果可以帮助海滩管理公司和公共管理部门选择最佳的运营策略,以减少海草收集和处理的环境和经济影响。