Suppr超能文献

平衡溶液与0.9%生理盐水静脉输液治疗对重症患者死亡率的影响:BaSICS随机临床试验

Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Zampieri Fernando G, Machado Flávia R, Biondi Rodrigo S, Freitas Flávio G R, Veiga Viviane C, Figueiredo Rodrigo C, Lovato Wilson J, Amêndola Cristina P, Serpa-Neto Ary, Paranhos Jorge L R, Guedes Marco A V, Lúcio Eraldo A, Oliveira-Júnior Lúcio C, Lisboa Thiago C, Lacerda Fábio H, Maia Israel S, Grion Cintia M C, Assunção Murillo S C, Manoel Airton L O, Silva-Junior João M, Duarte Péricles, Soares Rafael M, Miranda Tamiris A, de Lima Lucas M, Gurgel Rodrigo M, Paisani Denise M, Corrêa Thiago D, Azevedo Luciano C P, Kellum John A, Damiani Lucas P, Brandão da Silva Nilton, Cavalcanti Alexandre B

机构信息

HCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.

Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

JAMA. 2021 Aug 10;326(9):1-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11684.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Intravenous fluids are used for almost all intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Clinical and laboratory studies have questioned whether specific fluid types result in improved outcomes, including mortality and acute kidney injury.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of a balanced solution vs saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) on 90-day survival in critically ill patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, factorial, randomized clinical trial conducted at 75 ICUs in Brazil. Patients who were admitted to the ICU with at least 1 risk factor for worse outcomes, who required at least 1 fluid expansion, and who were expected to remain in the ICU for more than 24 hours were randomized between May 29, 2017, and March 2, 2020; follow-up concluded on October 29, 2020. Patients were randomized to 2 different fluid types (a balanced solution vs saline solution reported in this article) and 2 different infusion rates (reported separately).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a balanced solution (n = 5522) or 0.9% saline solution (n = 5530) for all intravenous fluids.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was 90-day survival.

RESULTS

Among 11 052 patients who were randomized, 10 520 (95.2%) were available for the analysis (mean age, 61.1 [SD, 17] years; 44.2% were women). There was no significant interaction between the 2 interventions (fluid type and infusion speed; P = .98). Planned surgical admissions represented 48.4% of all patients. Of all the patients, 60.6% had hypotension or vasopressor use and 44.3% required mechanical ventilation at enrollment. Patients in both groups received a median of 1.5 L of fluid during the first day after enrollment. By day 90, 1381 of 5230 patients (26.4%) assigned to a balanced solution died vs 1439 of 5290 patients (27.2%) assigned to saline solution (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.90-1.05]; P = .47). There were no unexpected treatment-related severe adverse events in either group.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Among critically ill patients requiring fluid challenges, use of a balanced solution compared with 0.9% saline solution did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality. The findings do not support the use of this balanced solution.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02875873.

摘要

重要性

几乎所有重症监护病房(ICU)患者都会使用静脉输液。临床和实验室研究对特定类型的液体是否能改善包括死亡率和急性肾损伤在内的预后提出了质疑。

目的

确定平衡溶液与盐溶液(0.9%氯化钠)对危重症患者90天生存率的影响。

设计、地点和参与者:在巴西75个ICU进行的双盲、析因、随机临床试验。2017年5月29日至2020年3月2日期间,将入住ICU且至少有1个预后较差风险因素、至少需要1次液体扩容且预计在ICU停留超过24小时的患者随机分组;随访于2020年10月29日结束。患者被随机分为2种不同的液体类型(本文报告的平衡溶液与盐溶液)和2种不同的输注速率(单独报告)。

干预措施

患者被1:1随机分配,所有静脉输液均接受平衡溶液(n = 5522)或0.9%盐溶液(n = 5530)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局为90天生存率。

结果

在11052例随机分组的患者中,10520例(95.2%)可纳入分析(平均年龄61.1[标准差,17]岁;44.2%为女性)。两种干预措施(液体类型和输注速度)之间无显著交互作用(P = 0.98)。计划手术入院患者占所有患者的48.4%。所有患者中,60.6%有低血压或使用血管升压药,44.3%在入组时需要机械通气。两组患者在入组后第一天接受的液体中位数均为1.5L。到第90天,分配接受平衡溶液的5230例患者中有1381例(26.4%)死亡,而分配接受盐溶液的5290例患者中有1439例(27.2%)死亡(校正风险比,0.97[95%CI,0.90 - 1.05];P = 0.47)。两组均未出现意外的与治疗相关的严重不良事件。

结论与相关性

在需要液体冲击的危重症患者中,与0.9%盐溶液相比,使用平衡溶液并未显著降低90天死亡率。这些发现不支持使用这种平衡溶液。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02875873。

相似文献

5

引用本文的文献

2
Perioperative fluid therapy in adults and children: a narrative review.成人和儿童围手术期液体治疗:一篇叙述性综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 1;12:1607670. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1607670. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

3
Balanced Crystalloid Solutions.平衡晶体溶液。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr 15;199(8):952-960. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201809-1677CI.
4
Intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill adults.危重症成人的静脉补液治疗。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Sep;14(9):541-557. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0044-0.
6
Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults.重症成年患者中平衡晶体液与生理盐水的比较
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):829-839. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验