Ismail Mohamad Ayob, Midin Marhani
Psychiatry Department, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center (UKMMC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 26;12:680800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.680800. eCollection 2021.
Shared decision-making (SDM) is recognized as a promising strategy for improving collaboration between clinicians and their patients in achieving recovery. In Malaysia, SDM among people with schizophrenia is still lacking both in practice and in research. This study aimed to determine the level of SDM and role preference and their associated factors among patients with schizophrenia in Malaysia. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 86 outpatient attendees with schizophrenia at a teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire and Control Preference Scale were used to assess perceived SDM experience and role preference, respectively. Linear and logistic regression models were used to analyze the factors associated with SDM and role preference, respectively. Factors with a p <0.25 from the simple regression analyses were controlled as the covariates in the multiple regression analyses. The study respondents were predominantly female, single, and unemployed, with a mean age of 44 years. Only 35% of the participants reported having high SDM experiences, even though the majority (56%) preferred autonomous role preference. Among the participants who preferred autonomous roles, only 40% experienced high SDM. High SDM was found to be significantly associated with being younger (B = -0.33, 95% CI = -0.67 to -0.003) and being non-clozapine users (B = 19.90, 95% CI = 9.39-30.41), while autonomous role preference was significantly associated with a lower level of insight [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.99] and being on oral antipsychotic drugs only (AOR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.10-7.82). The practice of SDM is still lacking in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia in Malaysia, even though many of them preferred to be involved in the decision-making pertaining to their treatment. This study indicates the need for clinicians to improve their patients' involvement in the treatment process. More research is needed on how SDM can be implemented in patients with schizophrenia, especially in Asian population settings.
共同决策(SDM)被认为是一种很有前景的策略,有助于改善临床医生与患者之间的协作以实现康复。在马来西亚,精神分裂症患者中的共同决策在实践和研究方面都仍很欠缺。本研究旨在确定马来西亚精神分裂症患者的共同决策水平、角色偏好及其相关因素。对马来西亚吉隆坡一家教学医院的86名精神分裂症门诊患者进行了一项横断面研究。分别使用九项共同决策问卷和控制偏好量表来评估感知到的共同决策体验和角色偏好。线性回归模型和逻辑回归模型分别用于分析与共同决策和角色偏好相关的因素。在多元回归分析中,将简单回归分析中p<0.25的因素作为协变量进行控制。研究受访者主要为女性、单身且失业,平均年龄44岁。尽管大多数(56%)患者偏好自主角色,但只有35%的参与者报告有较高的共同决策体验。在偏好自主角色的参与者中,只有40%体验到了较高的共同决策。研究发现,较高的共同决策体验与较年轻(B=-0.33,95%置信区间=-0.67至-0.003)和非氯氮平使用者(B=19.90,95%置信区间=9.39-30.41)显著相关,而自主角色偏好与较低的洞察力水平[调整后的优势比(AOR)=0.84,95%置信区间=0.72-0.99]以及仅服用口服抗精神病药物(AOR=2.94,95%置信区间=1.10-7.82)显著相关。在马来西亚,精神分裂症患者的治疗中仍缺乏共同决策的实践,尽管他们中的许多人希望参与有关其治疗的决策。本研究表明临床医生需要提高患者在治疗过程中的参与度。关于如何在精神分裂症患者中实施共同决策,尤其是在亚洲人群环境中,还需要更多的研究。