Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Psychophysiology. 2021 Dec;58(12):e13922. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13922. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
When unexpected events occur during goal-directed behavior, they automatically trigger an orienting-related cascade of psychological and neural processes through which they influence behavior and cognition. If the unexpected event was caused by an action error, additional error-specific, strategic-related processes have been proposed to follow the initial orienting period. Little is known about the neural interactions between action errors and unexpected perceptual events, two instantiations of unexpected events, in these two putative stages of post-error processing. Here, we aimed to address this by investigating the electrophysiological dynamics associated with action errors and unexpected perceptual events using scalp EEG with a focus on the frontal midline (FM) delta-to-theta oscillations (1-8 Hz) indicative of the performance-monitoring system. Specifically, we examined how the timing of unexpected sounds would influence behavior and neural oscillations after action errors, depending on the length of the intertrial interval (ITI). Our data showed that unexpected sounds aggravated post-error decreases in accuracy when they occurred (1) immediately after errors (i.e., post-error orienting period), regardless of ITI and (2) immediately after the post-error stimulus (i.e., post-error strategic period), at short ITIs. Meanwhile, action errors and unexpected sounds independently produced increased FM delta-to-theta power during the post-error orienting period, regardless of ITIs. However, when unexpected sounds occurred during the post-error strategic period, action errors produced lower FM delta-to-theta power than correct responses, at short ITIs. These differential effects of unexpected events on behavior and FM delta-to-theta dynamics support the notion of the two post-error periods during which different processes are implemented.
当目标导向行为中出现意外事件时,它们会自动触发一系列与定向相关的心理和神经过程,从而影响行为和认知。如果意外事件是由动作错误引起的,则提出了额外的特定于错误的、与策略相关的过程,以跟随初始定向期。对于在这些两个假设的后错误处理阶段中,两个意外事件的实例,即动作错误和意外感知事件之间的神经相互作用,人们知之甚少。在这里,我们通过使用头皮 EEG 研究与动作错误和意外感知事件相关的电生理动力学,重点关注指示绩效监测系统的额中线(FM)delta-to-theta 振荡(1-8 Hz),旨在解决这个问题。具体来说,我们检查了意外声音的时间如何根据试验间间隔(ITI)的长度来影响动作错误后的行为和神经振荡。我们的数据表明,当意外声音在以下两种情况下发生时,它们会加剧错误后的准确性下降:(1)在错误后立即发生(即后错误定向期),无论 ITI 如何;(2)在错误后刺激后立即发生(即后错误策略期),在短 ITI 时。同时,无论 ITI 如何,动作错误和意外声音都会在错误后定向期间独立产生增加的 FM delta-to-theta 功率。然而,当意外声音出现在后错误策略期间时,在短 ITI 时,动作错误产生的 FM delta-to-theta 功率低于正确响应。这些意外事件对行为和 FM delta-to-theta 动力学的不同影响支持了在这两个后错误期间实施不同过程的观点。