Suppr超能文献

对比时域和频域:错误相关负波和诱发θ振荡对错误后行为的预测作用不同。

Contrasting time and frequency domains: ERN and induced theta oscillations differentially predict post-error behavior.

机构信息

George Mason University MS 3F5, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.

Department of Psychology at University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jun;20(3):636-647. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00792-7.

Abstract

The present study investigated the neural dynamics of error processing in both the time and frequency domains, as well as associated behavioral phenomena, at the single-trial level. We used a technique that enabled us to separately investigate the evoked and induced aspects of the EEG signal (Cohen & Donner, 2013, Journal of Neurophysiology, 110[12], 2752-2763). We found that at the single-trial level, while the (evoked) error-related negativity (ERN) predicted only post-error slowing (PES)-and only when errors occurred on incongruent trials-induced frontal midline theta power served as a robust predictor of both PES and post-error accuracy (PEA) regardless of stimulus congruency. Mediation models of both electrophysiological indices demonstrated that although the relationship between theta and PEA was mediated by PES, there was not a relationship between the ERN and PEA. Our data suggest that although the ERN and frontal midline theta index functionally related underlying cognitive processes, they are not simply the same process manifested in different domains. In addition, our findings are consistent with the adaptive theory of post-error slowing, as PES was positively associated with post-error accuracy at the single-trial level. More generally, our study provides additional support for the inclusion of a time-frequency approach to better understand the role of medial frontal cortex in action monitoring.

摘要

本研究在单试次水平上,从时间和频率两个域中研究了错误处理的神经动力学,以及相关的行为现象。我们使用了一种能够分别研究 EEG 信号诱发和诱导方面的技术(Cohen & Donner, 2013, Journal of Neurophysiology, 110[12], 2752-2763)。我们发现,在单试次水平上,虽然(诱发的)错误相关负向电位(ERN)仅能预测错误后减速(PES)——并且仅在不一致试次上出现错误时——但无论刺激一致性如何,诱导的额中线 theta 功率都能作为 PES 和错误后准确性(PEA)的有力预测指标。这两个电生理指标的中介模型都表明,尽管 theta 与 PEA 之间的关系由 PES 介导,但 ERN 与 PEA 之间没有关系。我们的数据表明,尽管 ERN 和额中线 theta 指数在功能上与潜在的认知过程相关,但它们并不是在不同域中表现相同的过程。此外,我们的发现与错误后减速的适应性理论一致,因为 PES 在单试次水平上与错误后准确性呈正相关。更一般地说,我们的研究为包括时频方法提供了额外的支持,以更好地理解内侧前额叶皮层在动作监测中的作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验