Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500Krems, Austria.
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel, Vienna, Austria.
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jan;25(1):159-169. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003438. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
This study evaluated a simple environmental intervention called 'Water Schools' in Lower Austria providing free refillable water bottles and educational material.
Non-randomised controlled cluster trial with three measurements: at baseline (T0), after the intervention at 9 months (T1) and after 1-year follow-up (T2).
Half-day elementary schools in Lower Austria (Austria).
Third-grade pupils from twenty-two schools in the intervention group (IG) and thirty-two schools in the control group (CG) participated in the study. Data were analysed for 569 to 598 pupils in the IG and for 545 to 613 in the CG, depending on the time of measurement.
The consumption of tap water increased in the IG from baseline to T1 and then decreased again at T2, but this was similar in the CG (no statistically significant difference in the time trend between the IG and CG). Similar results were seen for tap water consumption in the mornings. The proportion of children who only drank tap water on school mornings increased significantly from baseline to T1 in the IG compared to the CG (P = 0·020). No difference in the changes over time occurred between the groups for the proportion of pupils drinking approximately one bottle of tap water during school mornings.
Not only the children in the IG but also those in the CG drank more tap water after 1 school year than at the beginning. The measurement of drinking habits in the CG may have been intervention enough to bring about changes or to initiate projects.
本研究评估了一项名为“水学校”的简单环境干预措施,该措施在奥地利下奥地利州免费提供可重复灌装的水瓶和教育材料。
非随机对照群集试验,共进行了三次测量:基线时(T0)、干预后 9 个月(T1)和 1 年随访时(T2)。
奥地利下奥地利州的半日制小学。
干预组(IG)的 22 所学校和对照组(CG)的 32 所学校的三年级学生参加了这项研究。根据测量时间的不同,IG 组有 569 至 598 名学生和 CG 组有 545 至 613 名学生参与数据分析。
IG 组的自来水消耗量从基线到 T1 增加,然后在 T2 再次下降,但 CG 组的情况类似(IG 和 CG 之间的时间趋势无统计学差异)。早上自来水的消耗量也出现了类似的结果。与 CG 相比,IG 组在基线至 T1 期间,仅在上学日早上饮用自来水的儿童比例显著增加(P = 0.020)。在上学日早上,两组学生饮用约一瓶自来水的比例在时间上的变化没有差异。
不仅 IG 组的儿童,而且 CG 组的儿童在一个学年后饮用的自来水也比开始时多。CG 组的饮水习惯测量可能足以带来变化或启动项目。