Forleo Giovanni B, Amellone Claudia, Sacchi Riccardo, Lombardi Leonida, Lucciola Maria Teresa, Scotti Valentina, Viecca Maurizio, Schiavone Marco, Giacopelli Daniele, Giammaria Massimo
Cardiology Unit ASST-Fatebenefratelli Sacco Luigi Sacco University Hospital Milan Italy.
Cardiology Unit Ospedale Maria Vittoria Turin Italy.
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jun 21;37(4):1061-1068. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12585. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Electrical artefacts are frequent in implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs). We analyzed the subcutaneous electrogram (sECG) provided by an ICM with a long sensing vector and factors potentially affecting its quality.
Consecutive ICM recipients underwent a follow-up where demographics, body mass index (BMI), implant location, and surface ECG were collected. The sECG was then analyzed in terms of R-wave amplitude and P-wave visibility.
A total of 84 patients (43% female, median age 68 [58-76] years) were enrolled at 3 sites. ICMs were positioned with intermediate inclination (n = 44, 52%), parallel (n = 35, 43%), or perpendicular (n = 5, 6%) to the sternum. The median R-wave amplitude was 1.10 (0.72-1.48) mV with P waves readily visible in 69.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 57.8%-79.2%), partially visible in 23.1% [95% CI: 14.3%-34.0%], and never visible in 7.7% [95% CI: 2.9%-16.0%] of patients. Men had higher R-wave amplitudes compared to women (1.40 [0.96-1.80] mV vs 1.00 [0.60-1.20] mV, = .001), while obese people tended to have lower values (0.80 [0.62-1.28] mV vs 1.10 [0.90-1.50] mV, = .074). The P-wave visibility reached 86.2% [95% CI: 68.3%-96.1%] in patients with high-voltage P waves (≥0.2 mV) at surface ECG. The sECG quality was not affected by implant site.
In ordinary clinical practice, ICMs with long sensing vector provided median R-wave amplitude above 1 mV and reliable P-wave visibility of nearly 70%, regardless of the position of the device. Women and obese patients showed lower but still very good signal quality.
植入式心脏监测器(ICM)中电伪迹很常见。我们分析了具有长感知向量的ICM提供的皮下心电图(sECG)及其质量的潜在影响因素。
对连续的ICM接受者进行随访,收集人口统计学信息、体重指数(BMI)、植入位置和体表心电图。然后从R波振幅和P波可见性方面分析sECG。
在3个地点共纳入84例患者(43%为女性,中位年龄68[58 - 76]岁)。ICM的放置方向与胸骨呈中间倾斜(n = 44,52%)、平行(n = 35,43%)或垂直(n = 5,6%)。R波振幅中位数为1.10(0.72 - 1.48)mV,69.2%(95%置信区间,CI:57.8% - 79.2%)的患者P波清晰可见,23.1%[95%CI:14.3% - 34.0%]的患者P波部分可见,7.7%[95%CI:2.9% - 16.0%]的患者P波从未可见。男性的R波振幅高于女性(1.40[0.96 - 1.80]mV对1.00[0.60 - 1.20]mV,P = 0.001),而肥胖者的R波振幅往往较低(0.80[0.62 - 1.28]mV对1.10[0.90 - 1.50]mV,P = 0.074)。体表心电图P波电压高(≥0.2mV)的患者中,P波可见性达86.2%[95%CI:68.3% - 96.1%]。sECG质量不受植入部位影响。
在普通临床实践中,无论设备位置如何,具有长感知向量的ICM提供的R波振幅中位数高于1mV,P波可见性可靠,接近70%。女性和肥胖患者的信号质量较低,但仍非常好。