• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组胺-2受体阻滞剂和质子泵抑制剂与危重症成年患者谵妄发生的关联:一项回顾性队列研究

Association of Histamine-2 Blockers and Proton-Pump Inhibitors With Delirium Development in Critically Ill Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Shiddapur Ami, Kistler Christine E, Busby-Whitehead Jan, Austin C Adrian

机构信息

Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL.

Divison of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2021 Aug 10;3(8):e0507. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000507. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000507
PMID:34396144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8357254/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists are commonly administered for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill adults and may be associated with delirium development. We aimed to determine differential associations of histamine-2 receptor antagonist or proton-pump inhibitor administration with delirium development in patients admitted to a medical ICU.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study using a deidentified database sourced from the University of North Carolina Health Care system. Participants were identified as having delirium utilizing an -based algorithm. Associations among histamine-2 receptor antagonist, proton-pump inhibitor, or no medication administration and delirium were identified using relative risk. Multiple logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders including mechanical ventilation and age.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care medical ICU in the United States.

PATIENTS

Adults admitted to the University of North Carolina medical ICU from January 2015 to December 2019, excluding those on concurrent histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors in the same encounter.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified 6,645 critically ill patients, of whom 29% ( = 1,899) received mechanical ventilation, 45% ( = 3,022) were 65 or older, and 22% ( = 1,487) died during their medical ICU encounter. Of the 6,645 patients, 31% ( = 2,057) received an histamine-2 receptor antagonist and no proton-pump inhibitors, 40% ( = 2,648) received a proton-pump inhibitor and no histamine-2 receptor antagonists, and 46% ( = 3,076) had delirium. The histamine-2 receptor antagonist group had a greater association with delirium than the proton-pump inhibitor group compared with controls receiving neither medication, after controlling for mechanical ventilation and age (risk ratio, 1.36; 1.25-1.47; < 0.001) and (risk ratio, 1.15; 1.07-1.24; < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists are more strongly associated with increased delirium than proton-pump inhibitors. Prospective studies are necessary to further elucidate this association and to determine if replacement of histamine-2 receptor antagonists with proton-pump inhibitors in ICUs decreases the burden of delirium in critically ill patients.

摘要

未标注

组胺-2受体拮抗剂常用于危重症成年患者的应激性溃疡预防,可能与谵妄的发生有关。我们旨在确定在入住内科重症监护病房(ICU)的患者中,使用组胺-2受体拮抗剂或质子泵抑制剂与谵妄发生之间的差异关联。

设计

一项回顾性观察研究,使用来自北卡罗来纳大学医疗系统的去识别数据库。利用基于[具体算法名称未给出]的算法将参与者确定为患有谵妄。使用相对风险来确定组胺-2受体拮抗剂、质子泵抑制剂或未用药与谵妄之间的关联。采用多因素逻辑回归来控制包括机械通气和年龄在内的潜在混杂因素。

设置

美国一所学术性三级医疗内科ICU。

患者

2015年1月至2019年12月入住北卡罗来纳大学内科ICU的成年人,排除在同一次住院期间同时使用组胺-2受体拮抗剂和质子泵抑制剂的患者。

干预措施

无。

测量指标和主要结果

我们确定了6645名危重症患者,其中29%(n = 1899)接受了机械通气,45%(n = 3022)年龄在65岁及以上,22%(n = 1487)在其内科ICU住院期间死亡。在这6645名患者中,31%(n = 2057)接受了组胺-2受体拮抗剂且未使用质子泵抑制剂,40%(n = 2648)接受了质子泵抑制剂且未使用组胺-2受体拮抗剂,46%(n = 3076)发生了谵妄。在控制了机械通气和年龄后,与既未使用这两种药物的对照组相比,组胺-2受体拮抗剂组与谵妄的关联比质子泵抑制剂组更强(风险比分别为1.36;95%置信区间为1.25 - 1.47;P < 0.001)和(风险比为1.15;95%置信区间为1.07 - 1.24;P < 0.001)。

结论

与质子泵抑制剂相比,组胺-2受体拮抗剂与谵妄增加的关联更强。需要进行前瞻性研究以进一步阐明这种关联,并确定在ICU中用质子泵抑制剂替代组胺-2受体拮抗剂是否能减轻危重症患者的谵妄负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76bb/8357254/3b648e52895b/cc9-3-e0507-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76bb/8357254/1c4292419328/cc9-3-e0507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76bb/8357254/3b648e52895b/cc9-3-e0507-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76bb/8357254/1c4292419328/cc9-3-e0507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76bb/8357254/3b648e52895b/cc9-3-e0507-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Histamine-2 Blockers and Proton-Pump Inhibitors With Delirium Development in Critically Ill Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.组胺-2受体阻滞剂和质子泵抑制剂与危重症成年患者谵妄发生的关联:一项回顾性队列研究
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Aug 10;3(8):e0507. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000507. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
A pragmatic assessment of proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine type 2 receptor antagonists on clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality when used for stress ulcer prophylaxis in the ICU.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 型受体拮抗剂在 ICU 应激性溃疡预防中用于临床重要胃肠道出血和死亡率的实用评估。
Pharmacotherapy. 2021 Oct;41(10):820-827. doi: 10.1002/phar.2621. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
3
Proton pump inhibitors versus histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂用于危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):693-705. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182758734.
4
Cost-effectiveness of histamine receptor-2 antagonist versus proton pump inhibitor for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients*.组胺 H2 受体拮抗剂与质子泵抑制剂预防危重症患者应激性溃疡的成本-效果分析*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):809-15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000032.
5
Effect of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis With Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers on In-Hospital Mortality Among ICU Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: The PEPTIC Randomized Clinical Trial.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂预防应激性溃疡对接受有创机械通气的 ICU 患者院内死亡率的影响:PEPTIC 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 18;323(7):616-626. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22190.
6
Gastric Acid Suppressant Prophylaxis in Pediatric Intensive Care: Current Practice as Reflected in a Large Administrative Database.儿科重症监护中胃酸抑制剂的预防性应用:大型管理数据库所反映的当前实践
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;16(7):605-12. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000427.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Histamine Receptor Antagonists Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients.组胺受体拮抗剂与质子泵抑制剂用于危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的成本效益分析
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Jan;37(1):43-53. doi: 10.1002/phar.1859. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
8
A cluster randomised, crossover, registry-embedded clinical trial of proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor blockers for ulcer prophylaxis therapy in the intensive care unit (PEPTIC study): study protocol.一项关于质子泵抑制剂与组胺-2受体阻滞剂在重症监护病房预防溃疡治疗中的群组随机、交叉、注册嵌入临床试验(PEPTIC研究):研究方案。
Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Sep;20(3):182-189.
9
Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit.组胺 2 受体拮抗剂与质子泵抑制剂对重症监护病房胃肠道出血和感染并发症的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):564-74. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14673.
10
Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists in critically ill adults - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.重症成人患者使用质子泵抑制剂或组胺 2 受体拮抗剂预防应激性溃疡 - 随机对照试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1105-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between exposure to proton pump inhibitors and delirium: a descriptive and disproportionality analysis of VigiBase.质子泵抑制剂暴露与谵妄的关联:VigiBase 的描述性和不成比例分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 16;14(10):e081911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081911.
2
Modern Sedation and Analgesia Strategies in Neurocritical Care.神经危重症监护中的现代镇静与镇痛策略。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 Apr;23(4):149-158. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01261-7. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis With Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers on In-Hospital Mortality Among ICU Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: The PEPTIC Randomized Clinical Trial.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂预防应激性溃疡对接受有创机械通气的 ICU 患者院内死亡率的影响:PEPTIC 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 18;323(7):616-626. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22190.
2
Long-term cognitive impairment after acute respiratory distress syndrome: a review of clinical impact and pathophysiological mechanisms.急性呼吸窘迫综合征后长期认知障碍:临床影响及病理生理机制综述。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 12;23(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2626-z.
3
Reduction in the rate of postoperative delirium by switching from famotidine to omeprazole in Japanese hepatectomized recipients.
在日本肝切除患者中,将法莫替丁换成奥美拉唑可降低术后谵妄发生率。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2019 May 7;5:10. doi: 10.1186/s40780-019-0139-1. eCollection 2019.
4
Histamine and Delirium: Current Opinion.组胺与谵妄:当前观点
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Apr 9;10:299. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00299. eCollection 2019.
5
Ranitidine-Induced Delirium in a 7-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report.雷尼替丁致 7 岁女童意识障碍:1 例报告。
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2428. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
6
Delirium pathophysiology: An updated hypothesis of the etiology of acute brain failure.谵妄病理生理学:急性脑衰竭病因的更新假说。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;33(11):1428-1457. doi: 10.1002/gps.4823. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
7
Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Cognitive Function in Women.质子泵抑制剂的使用与女性认知功能之间的关联。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153(4):971-979.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.061. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
The intensive care delirium research agenda: a multinational, interprofessional perspective.重症监护谵妄研究议程:多国家、多专业视角。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1329-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4860-7. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
9
Evaluation of algorithms to identify delirium in administrative claims and drug utilization database.在行政索赔和药物利用数据库中识别谵妄的算法评估
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):945-953. doi: 10.1002/pds.4226. Epub 2017 May 9.
10
In geriatric patients, delirium symptoms are related to the anticholinergic burden.在老年患者中,谵妄症状与抗胆碱能负担有关。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Apr;16(4):424-31. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12485. Epub 2015 May 8.