Department of Surgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Ann Surg. 2021 Sep 1;274(3):e245-e252. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004932.
The aim of this study was to examine real-life patterns of care and patient outcomes associated with robot-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) in New York State (NYS).
Although robotic assistance may offer some technological advantages, RACs are associated with higher procedural costs and longer operating times compared to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs). Evidence on long-term patient outcomes after RAC from large population-based datasets remains limited and inconsistent.
Using NYS inpatient and ambulatory surgery data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (2009-2017), we conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine patterns of utilization, complications, and secondary procedures following cholecystectomies.
Among 299,306 minimally invasive cholecystectomies performed in NYS between 2009 and 2017, one thousand one hundred eighteen (0.4%) were robot-assisted. Compared to those undergoing LC, RAC patients were older, travelled further for surgery, and were more likely to have public insurance and preoperative comorbidities. RAC versus LC patients were more significantly likely to have conversions to open procedure (4.9% vs 2.8%), bile duct injuries (1.3% vs 0.4%), and major reconstructive interventions (0.6% vs 0.1%), longer median length of stay (3 vs 1 day), readmissions (7.3% vs 4.4%), and higher 12-month post-index surgery hospital charges (P < 0.01 for all estimates). Other postoperative complications decreased over time for LC but remained unchanged for RAC patients.
Patients receiving RAC in NYS experienced higher rates of complications compared to LC patients. Addressing patient-, surgeon-, and system-level factors associated with intra/postoperative complications and applying recently promulgated safe cholecystectomy strategies coupled with advanced imaging modalities like fluorescence cholangiography to RAC may improve patient outcomes.
本研究旨在检查纽约州(NYS)机器人辅助胆囊切除术(RAC)相关的实际护理模式和患者结局。
尽管机器人辅助可能具有一些技术优势,但与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)相比,RAC 与更高的程序成本和更长的手术时间相关。来自大型基于人群数据集的 RAC 长期患者结局证据仍然有限且不一致。
我们使用州立规划和研究合作系统(2009-2017 年)的 NYS 住院和门诊手术数据,进行了双变量和多变量分析,以检查胆囊切除术后的利用、并发症和二次手术模式。
在 2009 年至 2017 年间在 NYS 进行的 299306 例微创胆囊切除术,有 1118 例(0.4%)为机器人辅助。与接受 LC 的患者相比,RAC 患者年龄更大,手术距离更远,更有可能拥有公共保险和术前合并症。与 LC 患者相比,RAC 患者更有可能转为开放手术(4.9%对 2.8%)、胆管损伤(1.3%对 0.4%)和重大重建干预(0.6%对 0.1%)、中位住院时间更长(3 天对 1 天)、再入院(7.3%对 4.4%)和术后 12 个月索引手术医院费用更高(所有估计值均 P < 0.01)。LC 患者的其他术后并发症随时间减少,但 RAC 患者的并发症保持不变。
在 NYS,接受 RAC 的患者比接受 LC 的患者发生并发症的几率更高。解决与围手术期并发症相关的患者、外科医生和系统因素,并将最近颁布的安全胆囊切除术策略应用于 RAC,并结合荧光胆管造影等先进成像方式,可能会改善患者结局。