• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health preferences and preventive care utilisation: How EQ-5D-5L health preferences may affect uptake.健康偏好与预防性医疗服务的利用:EQ-5D-5L健康偏好如何影响接受程度。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Aug 3;24:101514. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101514. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Examining the transnational health preferences of a group of Eastern European migrants relative to a European host population using the EQ-5D-5L.使用 EQ-5D-5L 考察一组东欧移民相对于欧洲东道国人群的跨国健康偏好。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112801. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112801. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
3
Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.EQ-5D-5L健康状态的时间权衡估值的决定因素:来自加拿大EQ-5D-5L估值研究的数据。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1679-85. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1203-4. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
4
Examining the Association between Polish Migrant Status and Health Preferences Using a Novel Application of a Smaller Design EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study.使用较小设计的EQ-5D-5L估值研究的新应用来检验波兰移民身份与健康偏好之间的关联。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 May;6(3):425-435. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00314-2. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
5
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
6
Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.EQ-5D五级版本的荷兰关税。
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
7
Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.平行评估:EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 社会价值集的直接比较。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):968-982. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18802797.
8
Parallel Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L by Time Trade-Off in Hungary.匈牙利通过时间贸易偏好法对 EQ-5D-3L 和 EQ-5D-5L 进行平行评估。
Value Health. 2020 Sep;23(9):1235-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
9
An Exploration on Attribute Non-attendance Using Discrete Choice Experiment Data from the Irish EQ-5D-5L National Valuation Study.利用爱尔兰EQ-5D-5L国家估值研究的离散选择实验数据对属性未出现情况的探索
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Jun;5(2):237-244. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00244-5. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
10
A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada.加拿大EQ-5D-5L基于时间权衡法得出的价值集
Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Association between Polish Migrant Status and Health Preferences Using a Novel Application of a Smaller Design EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study.使用较小设计的EQ-5D-5L估值研究的新应用来检验波兰移民身份与健康偏好之间的关联。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 May;6(3):425-435. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00314-2. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
An Exploration on Attribute Non-attendance Using Discrete Choice Experiment Data from the Irish EQ-5D-5L National Valuation Study.利用爱尔兰EQ-5D-5L国家估值研究的离散选择实验数据对属性未出现情况的探索
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Jun;5(2):237-244. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00244-5. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
Systematic reviews as a "lens of evidence": Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening.系统评价作为一种“证据之镜”:乳腺癌筛查参与的决定因素。
J Med Screen. 2021 Jun;28(2):70-79. doi: 10.1177/0969141320930743. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
Do people with private health insurance attach a higher value to health than those without insurance? Results from an EQ-5D-5 L valuation study in Ireland.拥有私人医疗保险的人比没有保险的人更重视健康吗?爱尔兰 EQ-5D-5L 估值研究的结果。
Health Policy. 2020 Jun;124(6):639-646. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Examining the transnational health preferences of a group of Eastern European migrants relative to a European host population using the EQ-5D-5L.使用 EQ-5D-5L 考察一组东欧移民相对于欧洲东道国人群的跨国健康偏好。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112801. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112801. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Toward a Smaller Design for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.迈向更小设计的 EQ-5D-5L 评估研究。
Value Health. 2019 Nov;22(11):1295-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
6
Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians.重视健康状况:埃塞俄比亚人的 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 Sep;22:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.475. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
7
United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.美国使用国际协议对 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态进行评估。
Value Health. 2019 Aug;22(8):931-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 May 25.
8
The Irish Healthcare System: A Morality Tale.爱尔兰医疗体系:一个道德故事。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Apr;28(2):276-302. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000100.
9
Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol.概述、更新以及从国际 EQ-5D-5L 估值工作中吸取的经验教训:EQ-5D-5L 估值议定书第 2 版。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Personality and preventive healthcare utilisation: Evidence from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing.人格与预防保健利用:来自爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究的证据。
Prev Med. 2019 Mar;120:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.029. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

健康偏好与预防性医疗服务的利用:EQ-5D-5L健康偏好如何影响接受程度。

Health preferences and preventive care utilisation: How EQ-5D-5L health preferences may affect uptake.

作者信息

Kelleher Dan, Doherty Edel, O'Neill Ciaran

机构信息

Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Ireland.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2021 Aug 3;24:101514. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101514. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101514
PMID:34401223
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8358689/
Abstract

Despite the economic and health benefits of preventive care being well established, the uptake of many cost-effective preventive services remains lower than desired in many cases, especially among specific sub-populations. The value an individual places on health can influence their uptake of preventive care. One way to capture the value an individual places on health and future health status is to examine their health preferences. This study used a novel use of EQ-5D-5L health preferences to determine if health preferences are associated with the uptake of a range of preventive care services, including a cancer screening, blood pressure check, cholesterol check, blood test and urine test. We collected EQ-5D-5L composite time trade-off data in 2018/2019 on 242 respondents residing in Ireland. We estimated an initial tobit model to predict an individual's health preference to capture health preferences as a regressor. We then estimated a bivariate probit model to examine the uptake of each preventive service and GP use. Each model controlled for health preferences, education, sex, type of health coverage, self-reported health, employment status, age and marital status. Health preferences are a significant determinant of all five preventive services while controlling for other covariates. The results shows that the higher an individual values good health, the more likely they are to avail of preventive care. Health preferences can be noted as a potential determinant of preventive care use that could guide policy responses seeking to increase demand-side factors for preventive care uptake.

摘要

尽管预防性保健在经济和健康方面的益处已得到充分证实,但在许多情况下,许多具有成本效益的预防性服务的采用率仍低于预期,尤其是在特定亚人群中。个人对健康的重视程度会影响他们对预防性保健的采用。衡量个人对健康和未来健康状况重视程度的一种方法是考察他们的健康偏好。本研究创新性地利用EQ-5D-5L健康偏好来确定健康偏好是否与一系列预防性保健服务的采用相关,这些服务包括癌症筛查、血压检查、胆固醇检查、血液检测和尿液检测。我们在2018/2019年收集了居住在爱尔兰的242名受访者的EQ-5D-5L综合时间权衡数据。我们估计了一个初始托比特模型,以预测个人的健康偏好,将健康偏好作为一个回归变量。然后,我们估计了一个双变量概率模型,以考察每项预防性服务的采用情况和全科医生的使用情况。每个模型都控制了健康偏好、教育程度、性别、健康保险类型、自我报告的健康状况、就业状况、年龄和婚姻状况。在控制其他协变量的情况下,健康偏好是所有五项预防性服务的一个重要决定因素。结果表明,个人对健康的重视程度越高,他们就越有可能利用预防性保健服务。健康偏好可被视为预防性保健使用的一个潜在决定因素,这可能会指导旨在增加预防性保健需求方因素的政策应对措施。