Suppr超能文献

它能融合吗?探索混合认知行为疗法治疗焦虑症时治疗师的忠诚度。

Does it blend? Exploring therapist fidelity in blended CBT for anxiety disorders.

作者信息

Romijn Geke, Provoost Simon, Batelaan Neeltje, Koning Jeroen, van Balkom Anton, Riper Heleen

机构信息

Clinical Psychology Section, Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Specialised Mental Health Institution, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2021 Jun 26;25:100418. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100418. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Blended cognitive-behavioural therapy (bCBT) combines face-to-face CBT (FtFCBT) and Internet-based CBT (iCBT) into one integrated treatment protocol, opening up new ways to deliver therapy, increase cost-effectiveness and resolve scarcity of therapist availability. When traditional therapy is transformed into a new format, there is a need to evaluate whether principles of the new protocol are consistently applied. This study aimed to explore therapist fidelity to bCBT protocols for anxiety disorders in specialised mental health care and to assess whether fidelity is related to patient characteristics. Adult patients ( = 44) received bCBT within a randomised controlled trial. Ratio of FtF to online sessions, session frequency and therapist adherence to instructions were assessed. Overall therapist fidelity with regard to ratio of blending, session frequency and instructions was high. Correlations were found between patients' share of online sessions and both session frequency ( = 0.373,  = .013), as well as patient computer experience ( = 0.314,  = .038). Adherence to instructions in FtF sessions was based on a subset of patients ( = 23) and should therefore be interpreted with caution. The blended approach was generally delivered as intended, indicating that the format is feasible in specialised mental health.

摘要

混合认知行为疗法(bCBT)将面对面认知行为疗法(FtFCBT)和基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT)整合为一个综合治疗方案,开辟了提供治疗的新途径,提高了成本效益,并解决了治疗师资源稀缺的问题。当传统疗法转变为新形式时,需要评估新方案的原则是否得到一致应用。本研究旨在探讨专业精神卫生保健中治疗师对焦虑症bCBT方案的忠诚度,并评估忠诚度是否与患者特征相关。成年患者(n = 44)在一项随机对照试验中接受了bCBT。评估了面对面治疗与在线治疗的比例、治疗频率以及治疗师对指导的依从性。总体而言,治疗师在混合比例、治疗频率和指导方面的忠诚度较高。发现患者在线治疗的比例与治疗频率(r = 0.373,p = .013)以及患者的计算机使用经验(r = 0.314,p = .038)之间存在相关性。面对面治疗中对指导的依从性是基于一部分患者(n = 23),因此应谨慎解释。混合方法通常按预期实施,表明该形式在专业精神卫生领域是可行的。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验