• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

半导板引导种植体植入的准确性:一项前瞻性、随机临床研究。

Accuracy of half-guided implant placement with machine-driven or manual insertion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

dicomLAB Dental, Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):1035-1043. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04087-0. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-021-04087-0
PMID:34401946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8791874/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the accuracy of implant placement performed with either a surgical motor or a torque wrench as part of a half-guided surgical protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Implant insertion with half-guided surgical protocol was utilized by surgical motor (machine-driven group) or torque wrench (manual group) in the posterior maxilla. After the healing period, accuracy comparison between planned and actual implant positions was performed based on preoperative cone beam computed tomography and postoperative digital intraoral scans. Coronal, apical, and angular deviations, insertion time, and insertion torque were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty patients were treated with 1 implant each; 20 implants were inserted with a surgical motor and 20 implants with a torque wrench. Global coronal and apical deviations were 1.20 ± 0.46 mm and 1.45 ± 0.79 mm in the machine-driven group, and 1.13 ± 0.38 mm and 1.18 ± 0.28 mm in the manual group (respectively). The mean angular deviation was 4.82 ± 2.07° in the machine-driven group and 4.11 ± 1.63° in the manual group. Mean insertion torque was 21.75 ± 9.75 Ncm in the machine-driven group, compared to 18.75 ± 7.05 Ncm in the manual group. Implant placement duration was 9.25 ± 1.86 s in the machine-driven group at a speed of 50 rpm, and 36.40 ± 8.15 s in the manual group.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of accuracy and mean insertion torque, while machine-driven implant placement was significantly less time-consuming.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Optimal implant placement accuracy utilized by half-guided surgical protocol can be achieved with both machine-driven and torque wrench insertion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ID: NCT04854239.

摘要

目的

比较在半引导式手术方案中使用手术电机或扭力扳手进行种植体植入的准确性。

材料与方法

在后上颌利用半引导式手术方案使用手术电机(机器驱动组)或扭力扳手(手动组)植入种植体。在愈合期后,根据术前锥形束计算机断层扫描和术后数字口内扫描,比较计划和实际种植体位置之间的准确性。评估了冠向、根尖向和角度偏差、植入时间和植入扭矩。

结果

40 名患者每人接受 1 个种植体治疗;20 个种植体使用手术电机植入,20 个种植体使用扭力扳手植入。机器驱动组的全局冠向和根尖向偏差分别为 1.20±0.46mm 和 1.45±0.79mm,手动组分别为 1.13±0.38mm 和 1.18±0.28mm。机器驱动组的平均角度偏差为 4.82±2.07°,手动组为 4.11±1.63°。机器驱动组的平均植入扭矩为 21.75±9.75Ncm,手动组为 18.75±7.05Ncm。机器驱动组的植入持续时间为 9.25±1.86s,转速为 50rpm,手动组为 36.40±8.15s。

结论

两组在准确性和平均植入扭矩方面没有显著差异,而机器驱动的种植体植入明显更省时。

临床相关性

半引导式手术方案可实现最佳种植体放置精度,可使用机器驱动和扭力扳手植入。

试验注册

编号:NCT04854239。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8678/8791874/887713214f91/784_2021_4087_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8678/8791874/a5f16eef04d3/784_2021_4087_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8678/8791874/f378d21f5f39/784_2021_4087_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8678/8791874/887713214f91/784_2021_4087_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8678/8791874/a5f16eef04d3/784_2021_4087_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8678/8791874/f378d21f5f39/784_2021_4087_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8678/8791874/887713214f91/784_2021_4087_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of half-guided implant placement with machine-driven or manual insertion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.半导板引导种植体植入的准确性:一项前瞻性、随机临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):1035-1043. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04087-0. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
2
The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.手术导板固定和种植体位置对静态计算机辅助种植手术精度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):155-164. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13371. Epub 2021 May 10.
3
Accuracy and Precision of Haptic Robotic-Guided Implant Surgery in a Large Consecutive Series.触觉机器人引导种植手术在大量连续系列中的准确性和精确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Feb 27;39(1):99-106. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10468.
4
A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.一种使用黏膜支持式手术模板的无牙颌上颌骨中计算机规划种植体植入的临床相关准确性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Apr;17(2):343-52. doi: 10.1111/cid.12112. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
5
Accuracy of computer-guided implantation in the placement of one-piece ceramic dental implants in the anterior region: A prospective clinical study.计算机引导种植在口腔前牙区单颗陶瓷种植体植入中的准确性:一项前瞻性临床研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 14;15(9):e0237229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237229. eCollection 2020.
6
In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.使用全数字规划模式和立体光刻导板进行种植体植入的体内准确性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):124-132. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6939.
7
Accuracy of partially and fully guided surgical techniques for immediate implant placement: An in vitro assessment.部分和完全引导式手术技术用于即刻种植体植入的准确性:体外评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Feb;129(2):363.e1-363.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.020. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
8
The implant position accuracy between using only surgical drill guide and surgical drill guide with implant guide in fully digital workflow: a randomized clinical trial.仅使用手术钻导板和完全数字化工作流程中使用手术钻导板和种植导板的植入位置精度:一项随机临床试验。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jun;26(2):229-237. doi: 10.1007/s10006-021-00975-7. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
9
Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery.全引导式与半引导式种植手术的准确性比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jul;24(7):763-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02484.x. Epub 2012 May 3.
10
Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: A cadaver study.无瓣即刻种植在前上颌骨中应用计算机辅助与徒手手术的准确性:一项尸体研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Dec;29(12):1186-1194. doi: 10.1111/clr.13382. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of accuracy in freehand versus computer-assisted (dynamic and static) dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.徒手与计算机辅助(动态和静态)牙种植体植入准确性的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Jan 1;25(1):22-29. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_369_24. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
Optimizing the primary stability of dental implants in type IV bone: in-vitro comparison of machine-driven and ratcheting insertion protocols.优化IV型骨中牙种植体的初期稳定性:机器驱动与棘轮式植入方案的体外比较
Eur Oral Res. 2025 Jan 5;59(1):46-52. doi: 10.26650/eor.20241296069.
3
Freehand vs. computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis-part 1: accuracy of planned and placed implant position.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidance means accuracy: A randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation.导板意味着精准:一项关于徒手与引导式牙种植的随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 May;31(5):417-430. doi: 10.1111/clr.13578. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
2
The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study.基于 CBCT 和口内扫描的计算机引导种植手术中,以牙支持、数字化设计的钻头导板的准确性。一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Oct;30(10):1005-1015. doi: 10.1111/clr.13514. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
3
Static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) analysing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), economics and surgical complications: A systematic review.
徒手植入手术与计算机辅助植入手术:系统评价与荟萃分析——第1部分:种植体计划位置与植入位置的准确性
Int J Implant Dent. 2025 May 2;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00622-w.
4
Assessment of hard tissue changes after horizontal guided bone regeneration with the aid of deep learning CBCT segmentation.借助深度学习CBCT分割技术评估水平引导骨再生后的硬组织变化。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 13;29(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06136-w.
5
[Strategies for prevention and treatment of vascular and nerve injuries in mandibular anterior implant surgery].[下颌前牙种植手术中血管和神经损伤的防治策略]
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Oct 25;53(5):550-560. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0256.
6
Accuracy of implant placement with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.计算机辅助静态、动态和机器人辅助手术中植入物放置的准确性:临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04033-y.
7
A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation.数字化手术导板用于牙种植精度的系统评价
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Oct 25;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w.
8
Intraoral Scanning as an Alternative to Evaluate the Accuracy of Dental Implant Placements in Partially Edentate Situations: A Prospective Clinical Case Series.口腔内扫描作为评估部分牙列缺失情况下牙种植体植入准确性的替代方法:一项前瞻性临床病例系列研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 5;11(19):5876. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195876.
静态计算机辅助种植手术(s-CAIS)分析患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)、经济学和手术并发症:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:359-373. doi: 10.1111/clr.13136.
4
Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies.计算机辅助手术中种植体植入的准确性:一项比较尸体研究、临床研究和体外研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 January/February;33(1):101–115. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.评估 7 种数字扫描仪的准确性:基于三维比较的体外分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
6
Digital technologies to support planning, treatment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments in implant dentistry. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO consensus conference 2015.支持种植牙科治疗计划、治疗及制作过程和疗效评估的数字技术。总结与共识声明。2015年第四届欧洲口腔种植学会共识会议
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 11:97-101. doi: 10.1111/clr.12648.
7
The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience.经验不足的外科医生使用黏膜支持的立体光刻手术模板进行引导手术的准确性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Dec;26(12):1489-94. doi: 10.1111/clr.12494. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.一项比较引导式种植手术(骨支持或黏膜支持)与神经导航或使用导向钻模板的随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jul;41(7):717-23. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12231. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
9
Surgical and prosthetic correction of malposed maxillary implants: a case report.上颌种植体位置异常的手术及修复矫正:一例病例报告
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Sep-Oct;33(5):575-81. doi: 10.11607/prd.1199.
10
How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide?模板定位错误如何影响使用单一固定黏膜支持的立体光刻手术导板植入种植体的准确性?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;43(1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Aug 2.