• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化手术导板用于牙种植精度的系统评价

A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation.

机构信息

Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, 201318, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Oct 25;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w.

DOI:10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w
PMID:37875645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10597938/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This review aimed to reveal the influence of implant guides on surgical accuracy with regard to supporting types, manufacturing methods and design (including fixation screws and sleeves).

METHODS

A literature search related to accuracy of surgical guides for dental implantation was performed in Web of Science and PubMed. Studies with in vivo or in vitro deviation data published in recent 5 years (2018-2022) were included and assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale with regard to risk of bias and reliability degree of clinical studies. Accuracy-related deviation data were summarized as forest plots and normal distributions.

RESULTS

Forty-one articles were included with high degree of credibility. Data showed that implant surgery accuracy can be achieved with mean distance deviation < 2 mm (most < 1 mm) and angular deviation < 8° (most < 5°).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral tooth-supported guides exhibited highest in vitro accuracy and similar in vivo accuracy to unilateral tooth-supported guides; mucosa-supported guides exhibit lowest in vivo accuracy, while its in vitro data showed low credibility due to mechanical complexity of living mucosa tissue. Milling exhibited higher in vivo accuracy of guides than 3d-printing, though further data support was needed. Design of fixation screws and sleeves of implant guides affected the surgical accuracy and might remain a research focus in near future. However, lack of universal evaluation standards for implantation accuracy remained a major problem in this field. The influence of implant guides on surgical accuracy revealed in this review might shed light on future development of dental implantology.

摘要

目的

本综述旨在揭示种植导板在支持类型、制造方法和设计(包括固定螺丝和套管)方面对手术精度的影响。

方法

在 Web of Science 和 PubMed 上检索与牙种植手术导板精度相关的文献。纳入近 5 年(2018-2022 年)发表的体内或体外偏差数据的研究,并按照纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale)评估其偏倚风险和临床研究的可靠性程度。将与精度相关的偏差数据总结为森林图和正态分布。

结果

共纳入 41 篇可信度较高的文章。数据显示,种植手术精度可通过平均距离偏差<2mm(大多数<1mm)和角度偏差<8°(大多数<5°)来实现。

结论

双侧牙支持导板具有最高的体外精度,与单侧牙支持导板的体内精度相似;黏膜支持导板的体内精度最低,而其体外数据由于活黏膜组织的机械复杂性而可信度较低。与 3D 打印相比,铣削具有更高的导板体内精度,但需要进一步的数据支持。种植导板固定螺丝和套管的设计影响手术精度,可能成为未来研究的重点。然而,种植精度的通用评价标准缺乏仍是该领域的主要问题。本综述中揭示的种植导板对手术精度的影响可能为未来牙种植学的发展提供启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/fbafe2a31b4f/40729_2023_507_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/0f6d2ab8891c/40729_2023_507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/b787ddbf6e87/40729_2023_507_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/5b1e30d0af73/40729_2023_507_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/fbe2b44fd2ff/40729_2023_507_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/fbafe2a31b4f/40729_2023_507_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/0f6d2ab8891c/40729_2023_507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/b787ddbf6e87/40729_2023_507_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/5b1e30d0af73/40729_2023_507_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/fbe2b44fd2ff/40729_2023_507_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da70/10597938/fbafe2a31b4f/40729_2023_507_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation.数字化手术导板用于牙种植精度的系统评价
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Oct 25;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w.
2
Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.上颌窦提升术用于牙种植修复的有效性:一项Cochrane系统评价
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):7-26.
3
Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery.微创牙种植体植入术:无瓣全引导手术的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Periodontol 2000. 2023 Feb;91(1):89-112. doi: 10.1111/prd.12440. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
4
Accuracy of surgical templates with and without metallic sleeves in case of partial arch restorations: A systematic review.带有和不带有金属套筒的外科模板在部分牙弓修复中的准确性:系统评价。
J Dent. 2021 Dec;115:103852. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103852. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
5
Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.机器人辅助种植牙植入与静态/动态计算机辅助种植手术的准确性比较:一项体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 20;60(1):11. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010011.
6
Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动态计算机辅助种植体植入的准确性评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies.计算机辅助手术中种植体植入的准确性:一项比较尸体研究、临床研究和体外研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 January/February;33(1):101–115. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
8
Soft tissue management for dental implants: what are the most effective techniques? A Cochrane systematic review.牙种植体的软组织管理:最有效的技术有哪些?一项Cochrane系统评价。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Autumn;5(3):221-38.
9
The impact of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants on hard and soft tissues in the anterior maxilla.即刻植入并修复的单颗上颌前牙种植体对软硬组织的影响。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9 Suppl 1:S89-106.
10
Comparison of dynamic navigation systems in dental implantology: a systematic literature review of in vitro studies.牙种植术中动态导航系统的比较:体外研究的系统文献综述
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Jul;54(7):647-656. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of Drill Sleeve Housing in 3D-Printed and Milled Implant Surgical Guides: A 3D Analysis Considering Machine Type, Layer Thickness, Sleeve Position, and Steam Sterilization.3D打印和铣削种植外科导板中钻套外壳的精度:一项考虑机器类型、层厚、套筒位置和蒸汽灭菌的三维分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;12(8):799. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12080799.
2
The application of plotted surgical guides for pilot-guided and full-guided implant insertion- a prospective model study in a cohort of undergraduate dental students.绘制手术导板在引导种植体植入(包括初步引导和全程引导)中的应用——一项针对本科牙科学生队列的前瞻性模型研究
Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Aug 16;11(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00642-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of Augmented Reality-Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.增强现实辅助导航在牙种植术中的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 4;25:e42040. doi: 10.2196/42040.
2
Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study.在上颌美学区即刻种植中,比较使用静态和动态计算机辅助种植系统的准确性:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Dec 13;8(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00464-w.
3
Is computer-guided implant placement with a flapless approach more accurate than with a flapped surgical approach?
Are dental magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography techniques reliable alternatives for treatment planning dental implants? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
牙科磁共振成像和超声检查技术是种植牙治疗计划的可靠替代方法吗?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Aug 11;11(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00634-6.
4
A novel sleeveless guided system for reducing thermal injury in endodontic microsurgery with enhanced accuracy and efficiency.一种新型无袖引导系统,用于在牙髓显微手术中减少热损伤,同时提高准确性和效率。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jun 23;29(7):347. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06433-y.
5
Positional Accuracy of Dental Implants Placed by Means of Fully Guided Technique in Partially Edentulous Patients: A Retrospective Study.部分牙列缺损患者采用全引导技术植入牙种植体的位置精度:一项回顾性研究
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Jun;11(3):e70144. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70144.
6
Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Milled Versus 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Subperiosteal Implants for Atrophic Mandibular Ridges: A Randomized Clinical Trial.用于萎缩性下颌牙槽嵴的铣削式与3D打印定制骨膜下种植体的临床及影像学评估:一项随机临床试验
Cureus. 2025 Mar 10;17(3):e80326. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80326. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Three-Dimensional Surgical Guides in Orthodontics: The Present and the Future.正畸学中的三维手术导板:现状与未来
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;13(2):74. doi: 10.3390/dj13020074.
8
Retrospective clinical follow-up of implants placed in edentulous jaws after computer-guided surgery and immediate loading, in geriatric patients.老年患者在计算机引导手术及即刻负重后,对无牙颌种植体的回顾性临床随访。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Jan 1;30(1):e76-e85. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26837.
9
Transitional implants in computer-assisted implant surgery and fixed complete-arch provisionalization: A retrospective case series.计算机辅助种植手术中的过渡性种植体与固定全牙弓临时修复:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13396. doi: 10.1111/cid.13396. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
10
Current knowledge about stackable guides: a scoping review.关于可堆叠导板的现有知识:范围综述。
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 May 31;10(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00547-w.
计算机引导下无瓣手术入路与有瓣手术入路相比,种植体植入更精确吗?
Evid Based Dent. 2022 Sep;23(3):110-111. doi: 10.1038/s41432-022-0813-2. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides.口腔内扫描仪和桌面 3D 打印牙支持导板引导种植手术的准确性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):479-484. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9432.
5
Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in immediate implant placement: An experimental study.计算机辅助手术在即刻种植植入中的准确性:一项实验研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022 May-Jun;26(3):219-223. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_763_20. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
6
Accuracy of a guided implant system with milled surgical templates.导板辅助种植系统中铣削式模板的准确性。
J Oral Sci. 2022 Apr 1;64(2):145-150. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.21-0361. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
7
A randomized clinical trial on the accuracy of guided implant surgery between two implant-planning programs used by inexperienced operators.两种由无经验操作者使用的种植体规划方案指导下的种植手术准确性的随机临床试验。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Mar;131(3):436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.038. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Precision and trueness of computer-assisted implant placement using static surgical guides with open and closed sleeves: An in vitro analysis.使用带有开放式和封闭式套筒的静态手术导板进行计算机辅助种植体植入的精度和准确性:一项体外分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Apr;33(4):441-450. doi: 10.1111/clr.13904. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
9
Accuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study.静态全引导种植体在后牙区部分牙列缺失中的准确性:一项队列前瞻性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2783-2791. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04254-3. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
10
Accuracy of surgical templates with and without metallic sleeves in case of partial arch restorations: A systematic review.带有和不带有金属套筒的外科模板在部分牙弓修复中的准确性:系统评价。
J Dent. 2021 Dec;115:103852. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103852. Epub 2021 Oct 14.