• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺MRI的5种直肠准备策略比较及其对图像质量的影响

Comparison of 5 Rectal Preparation Strategies for Prostate MRI and Impact on Image Quality.

作者信息

Sathiadoss Paul, Haroon Mohammad, Osman Heba, Ahmad Faraz, Papadatos Philip, Schieda Nicola

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022 May;73(2):346-354. doi: 10.1177/08465371211033753. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1177/08465371211033753
PMID:34404240
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare 5 different rectal preparation strategies for prostate MRI.

METHODS

This 5-arm quality-assurance study evaluated 56 patients per arm (280 patients) including: no preparation, clear-fluids diet (CFD) beginning at 00:00 hours on the day of MRI, Fleet®-enema, enema + CFD, enema + CFD + IV-antispasmodic agent. The study was powered to 0.80 with alpha-error of 0.05. Three blinded radiologists independently evaluated T2-Weighted (T2W) and Diffusion Weighed Imaging (DWI) for: rectal diameter (maximal AP diameter), rectal content (stool, fluid, gas), rectal motion, T2W/DWI image quality, T2W image sharpness and DWI susceptibility artifact using 5-point Likert scales. Overall comparisons were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis, with pair-wise comparisons using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon sign-rank tests.

RESULTS

Rectal diameter and amount of gas were lower in enema compared to non-enema groups (p < 0.001), with smallest diameter and least gas in the enema + CFD + IV-antispasmodic group (p = 0.022-<0.001). T2W image quality and sharpness were highest in the enema + CFD groups (p < 0.001) with no difference comparing enema + CFD with/without IV-antispasmodic (p = 0.064, 0.084). Motion artifact was least in enema + CFD + IV-antispasmodic group compared to all other groups (p < 0.001), followed by the enema + CFD group (p = 0.008-<0.001). DWI image quality was highest (p < 0.001) and DWI susceptibility artifact lowest (p < 0.001) in the enema + CFD groups (p < 0.001) and did not differ comparing enema + CFD with/without anti-spasmodic (p = 0.058-0.202).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of enema + clear-fluids diet before prostate MRI yields the highest T2W and DWI image quality with the least DWI artifact. IV-antispasmodic use reduces motion on T2W but does not improve image quality on T2W or DWI, or lessen DWI artifact compared to enema + clear-fluids diet.

摘要

目的

比较5种不同的直肠准备策略用于前列腺MRI检查的效果。

方法

这项五组对照的质量保证研究每组评估56例患者(共280例患者),包括:不做准备、在MRI当天00:00开始的清流饮食(CFD)、福静清灌肠剂灌肠、灌肠+CFD、灌肠+CFD+静脉注射抗痉挛药物。该研究的检验效能设定为0.80,α错误率为0.05。三名盲法放射科医生独立使用5级李克特量表对T2加权(T2W)和扩散加权成像(DWI)进行评估,评估内容包括:直肠直径(前后径最大值)、直肠内容物(粪便、液体、气体)、直肠运动、T2W/DWI图像质量、T2W图像清晰度和DWI磁敏感伪影。总体比较采用方差分析(ANOVA)和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验,两两比较采用配对t检验和威尔科克森符号秩检验。

结果

与未灌肠组相比,灌肠组的直肠直径和气体量更低(p<0.001),灌肠+CFD+静脉注射抗痉挛药物组的直径最小且气体最少(p=0.022至<0.001)。灌肠+CFD组的T2W图像质量和清晰度最高(p<0.001),灌肠+CFD组与使用/未使用静脉注射抗痉挛药物组之间无差异(p=0.064,0.084)。与所有其他组相比,灌肠+CFD+静脉注射抗痉挛药物组的运动伪影最少(p<0.001),其次是灌肠+CFD组(p=0.008至<0.001)。灌肠+CFD组的DWI图像质量最高(p<0.001),DWI磁敏感伪影最低(p<0.001),且灌肠+CFD组与使用/未使用抗痉挛药物组之间无差异(p=0.058至0.202)。

结论

在前列腺MRI检查前使用灌肠+清流饮食可获得最高的T2W和DWI图像质量,且DWI伪影最少。与灌肠+清流饮食相比,使用静脉注射抗痉挛药物可减少T2W上的运动,但不能改善T2W或DWI的图像质量,也不能减轻DWI伪影。

相似文献

1
Comparison of 5 Rectal Preparation Strategies for Prostate MRI and Impact on Image Quality.前列腺MRI的5种直肠准备策略比较及其对图像质量的影响
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022 May;73(2):346-354. doi: 10.1177/08465371211033753. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Patient preparation for prostate MRI: A scoping review.前列腺MRI的患者准备:一项范围综述。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 May;162:110758. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110758. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
3
Micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI: effects on rectal gas, image quality and PI-QUAL score.前列腺MRI检查前即刻进行微灌肠:对直肠气体、图像质量及PI-QUAL评分的影响
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr;50(4):1662-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04617-w. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
Utility of Quantitative T2-Mapping Compared to Conventional and Advanced Diffusion Weighted Imaging Techniques for Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Men with Hip Prosthesis.定量 T2 映射技术在髋关节假体男性患者多参数前列腺 MRI 中的应用价值:与常规和高级扩散加权成像技术的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jan;55(1):265-274. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27803. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
5
Impact of bowel preparation with Fleet's™ enema on prostate MRI quality.Fleet's™灌肠剂肠道准备对前列腺MRI质量的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):4252-4259. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02487-6.
6
Does a cleansing enema improve image quality of 3T surface coil multiparametric prostate MRI?清洁灌肠能否提高3T表面线圈多参数前列腺MRI的图像质量?
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Sep;42(3):689-97. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24833. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
7
How to improve image quality of DWI of the prostate-enema or catheter preparation?如何提高经直肠或经尿道前列腺磁共振弥散加权成像的图像质量?
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6708-6716. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07842-9. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
8
Evaluating the effect of rectal distension on prostate multiparametric MRI image quality.评估直肠扩张对前列腺多参数磁共振成像图像质量的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2017 May;90:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
9
Influence of Enema and Dietary Restrictions on Prostate MR Image Quality: A Multireader Study.灌肠和饮食限制对前列腺磁共振图像质量的影响:一项多读者研究。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Jan;29(1):4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
10
Rectal preparation significantly improves prostate imaging quality: Assessment of the PI-QUAL score with visual grading characteristics.直肠准备显著提高前列腺成像质量:PI-QUAL 评分与视觉分级特征评估。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Feb;147:110145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110145. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
On-table monitoring of prostate MRI could enable tailored utilisation of gadolinium contrast.前列腺MRI术中监测可实现钆对比剂的个性化应用。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11479-3.
2
Insights into Radiology Publications.放射学出版物洞察
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S18-S29. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1793914. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Interpreting Prostate Multiparametric MRI: Beyond Adenocarcinoma - Anatomical Variations, Mimickers, and Post-Intervention Changes.解读前列腺多参数磁共振成像:超越腺癌——解剖变异、模仿者及干预后改变
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2025 Feb;46(1):2-30. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2024.11.001. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
4
Micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI: effects on rectal gas, image quality and PI-QUAL score.前列腺MRI检查前即刻进行微灌肠:对直肠气体、图像质量及PI-QUAL评分的影响
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr;50(4):1662-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04617-w. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
5
Multiparametric quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of uterine fibroids for prediction of growth rate-a pilot study.用于预测子宫肌瘤生长速率的多参数定量磁共振成像——一项初步研究
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):4362-4375. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1663. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
6
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Reduce the Interference of Rectal Artifacts in MRI-based Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.深度学习模型的开发与验证:减少 MRI 前列腺癌诊断中直肠伪影的干扰。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230362. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230362.
7
Machine learning based prediction of image quality in prostate MRI using rapid localizer images.基于机器学习利用快速定位图像预测前列腺MRI图像质量
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024 Mar;11(2):026001. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.026001. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
8
Prostate MRI and image Quality: It is time to take stock.前列腺磁共振成像和图像质量:是时候进行评估了。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Apr;161:110757. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110757. Epub 2023 Feb 25.