From the Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China (L.H.); Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, No. 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou 510080, China (L.H., Z.W.S., C.H., C.L., Z.L.); Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, China (L.H., Z.W.S., C.H., C.L., Z.L.); Department of TPS Algorithm, Xi'an OUR United Corporation, Xi'an, China (X.G.); State Key Laboratory of Integrated Services Networks, School of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, China (D.Z.); Department of Radiology, Yichang Central People's Hospital Affiliated to the First Clinical Medical College of Three Gorges University, Yichang, China (Z.W., C.Y.); Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China (L.D., H.L., J.Z., Yuehua Li); and Department of Radiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China (L.L., Ying Li, T.Z., Y.Z.).
Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230362. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230362.
Purpose To develop an MRI-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis that can resist rectal artifact interference. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 2203 male patients with prostate lesions who underwent biparametric MRI and biopsy between January 2019 and June 2023. Targeted adversarial training with proprietary adversarial samples (TPAS) strategy was proposed to enhance model resistance against rectal artifacts. The automated csPCa diagnostic models trained with and without TPAS were compared using multicenter validation datasets. The impact of rectal artifacts on the diagnostic performance of each model at the patient and lesion levels was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The AUC between models was compared using the DeLong test, and the AUPRC was compared using the bootstrap method. Results The TPAS model exhibited diagnostic performance improvements of 6% at the patient level (AUC: 0.87 vs 0.81, < .001) and 7% at the lesion level (AUPRC: 0.84 vs 0.77, = .007) compared with the control model. The TPAS model demonstrated less performance decline in the presence of rectal artifact-pattern adversarial noise than the control model (ΔAUC: -17% vs -19%, ΔAUPRC: -18% vs -21%). The TPAS model performed better than the control model in patients with moderate (AUC: 0.79 vs 0.73, AUPRC: 0.68 vs 0.61) and severe (AUC: 0.75 vs 0.57, AUPRC: 0.69 vs 0.59) artifacts. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the TPAS model can reduce rectal artifact interference in MRI-based csPCa diagnosis, thereby improving its performance in clinical applications. MR-Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Urinary, Prostate, Comparative Studies, Diagnosis, Transfer Learning Clinical trial registration no. ChiCTR23000069832 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
目的 开发一种基于 MRI 的临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)诊断模型,以抵抗直肠伪影干扰。
材料与方法 本回顾性研究纳入了 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间接受双参数 MRI 和活检的 2203 名前列腺病变男性患者。提出了一种带有专有对抗样本(TPAS)策略的靶向对抗训练,以增强模型对直肠伪影的抵抗力。使用多中心验证数据集比较了使用和不使用 TPAS 训练的自动 csPCa 诊断模型。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和精确召回曲线下面积(AUPRC)比较了每个模型在患者和病变水平上对直肠伪影的诊断性能影响。使用 DeLong 检验比较模型之间的 AUC,使用自举法比较 AUPRC。
结果 TPAS 模型在患者水平上的诊断性能提高了 6%(AUC:0.87 比 0.81,<0.001),在病变水平上提高了 7%(AUPRC:0.84 比 0.77,=0.007),与对照模型相比。与对照模型相比,TPAS 模型在存在直肠伪影模式对抗噪声时的性能下降较小(AUC:-17% 比-19%,AUPRC:-18% 比-21%)。与对照模型相比,TPAS 模型在中度(AUC:0.79 比 0.73,AUPRC:0.68 比 0.61)和重度(AUC:0.75 比 0.57,AUPRC:0.69 比 0.59)直肠伪影患者中表现更好。
结论 本研究表明,TPAS 模型可以减少 MRI 中基于 csPCa 诊断的直肠伪影干扰,从而提高其在临床应用中的性能。