Brazilian Dental Association, Taguatinga, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.
Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1293-1298. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04103-3. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the auto apical function in the maintenance of the apical limit of instrumentation during glide path procedures when associated to OGP kinematics of Tri Auto ZX2, compared to the continuous rotation of the same motor, as well as Root ZX II and VDW Gold.
Forty-eight extracted human mandibular single-rooted premolars were selected. After endodontic access, cervical pre-flaring was performed using size 30, 0.10 taper rotary instruments, and the apical foramen size was standardized to 200 μm. Teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 12) according to the device and kinematics. For all the groups, the Auto Apical Stop function (AAS) was set to the 0.0 mark. Glide path instruments size 25, .01 taper were activated inside the canals until the apical limit was reached. Then, the files were fixed with cyanoacrylate to the teeth and decoupled from the equipment. Data were statistically analyzed in GraphPad Prism 6.0 software with the significance set at 5% (Kruskal-Wallis tests).
There was no difference in the mean deviation between the groups. No significant difference was found among the groups when the distributions and percentages of differences between the file tip and the apical foramen were compared (P > 0.05).
The use of auto apical function at the 0.0 mark of all tested devices provided an adequate control of the apical limit during glide path preparation. Foramen locating accuracy of Tri Auto ZX2 in OGP kinematics was similar to those of Tri Auto ZX2, Root ZX II, and VDW Gold in continuous kinematics.
Clinical strategies in canal negotiation and glide path as OGP motion associated to electronic foramen locators could reduce iatrogenic risk of deviation and file fractures and create an easier initial preparation to facilitate endodontic procedures.
本研究旨在评估在使用 Tri Auto ZX2 的 OGP 运动学进行导丝时,自动根尖功能在维持器械根尖极限方面的准确性,与同一马达的连续旋转以及 Root ZX II 和 VDW Gold 进行比较。
选择 48 颗下颌单根前磨牙。根管进入后,使用 30 号、0.10 锥度旋转器械进行颈部预扩,将根尖孔尺寸标准化至 200μm。牙齿根据器械和运动学随机分为四组(n=12)。对于所有组,将自动根尖停止功能(AAS)设置为 0.0 标记。将 25 号、0.01 锥度的导丝放入根管内,直至到达根尖极限。然后,用氰基丙烯酸酯将文件固定在牙齿上,并与设备分离。使用 GraphPad Prism 6.0 软件对数据进行统计分析,置信度为 5%(Kruskal-Wallis 检验)。
组间平均偏差无差异。当比较文件尖端和根尖孔之间的差异分布和百分比时,各组之间没有发现显著差异(P>0.05)。
在所有测试设备的 0.0 标记处使用自动根尖功能可以在导丝预备过程中提供对根尖极限的适当控制。在 OGP 运动学中,Tri Auto ZX2 的根尖定位准确性与连续运动学中的 Tri Auto ZX2、Root ZX II 和 VDW Gold 相似。
与电子根尖定位器相关的 OGP 运动学中的根管协商和导丝策略可以降低医源性偏差和器械折断的风险,并为根管治疗程序创造更容易的初始准备。