• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Within and across country variations in treatment of patients with heart failure and diabetes.心力衰竭和糖尿病患者治疗的国内和国际差异。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1358-1369. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13854. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
2
International comparison of health spending and utilization among people with complex multimorbidity.复杂共病患者的卫生支出和利用情况的国际比较。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1317-1334. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13708. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Differences in health care spending and utilization among older frail adults in high-income countries: ICCONIC hip fracture persona.高收入国家中体弱老年人的医疗保健支出和利用的差异:ICONIC 髋部骨折患者。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1335-1346. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13739. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
4
International comparison of spending and utilization at the end of life for hip fracture patients.国际比较髋部骨折患者临终时的支出和利用情况。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1370-1382. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13734. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
5
A methodology for identifying high-need, high-cost patient personas for international comparisons.一种用于确定具有高需求、高费用患者特征的国际比较方法。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1302-1316. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13890.
6
Differences in health outcomes for high-need high-cost patients across high-income countries.高收入国家高需求高花费患者的健康结果差异。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1347-1357. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13735. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
An international comparison of long-term care trajectories and spending following hip fracture.国际髋关节骨折后长期护理轨迹和支出的比较。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1383-1393. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13864. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
8
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
9
Differences in place of death between lung cancer and COPD patients: a 14-country study using death certificate data.肺癌和 COPD 患者死亡地点的差异:使用死亡证明数据的 14 国研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Mar 3;27(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0017-y.
10
Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe.北美和西欧重症监护服务的差异。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2787-93, e1-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186aec8.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification and classification of principal features for analyzing unwarranted clinical variation.分析不适当临床变异的主要特征的识别和分类。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;30(2):251-259. doi: 10.1111/jep.13940. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
2
International comparison of patient care trajectories: Insights from the ICCONIC project.患者护理轨迹的国际比较:来自ICCONIC项目的见解。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1295-1298. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13887.
3
How can we make valid and useful comparisons of different health care systems?我们如何对不同的医疗保健系统进行有效且有用的比较?
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1299-1301. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13883.
4
A methodology for identifying high-need, high-cost patient personas for international comparisons.一种用于确定具有高需求、高费用患者特征的国际比较方法。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1302-1316. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13890.

本文引用的文献

1
A methodology for identifying high-need, high-cost patient personas for international comparisons.一种用于确定具有高需求、高费用患者特征的国际比较方法。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1302-1316. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13890.
2
Differences in health outcomes for high-need high-cost patients across high-income countries.高收入国家高需求高花费患者的健康结果差异。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1347-1357. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13735. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
3
International comparison of health spending and utilization among people with complex multimorbidity.复杂共病患者的卫生支出和利用情况的国际比较。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1317-1334. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13708. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
4
Universal Health Coverage: Are Older Adults Being Left Behind? Evidence From Aging Cohorts In Twenty-Three Countries.全民健康覆盖:老年人被落下了吗?来自 23 个国家老龄化队列的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Nov;39(11):1951-1960. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01570.
5
Impact of Competition Versus Centralisation of Hospital Care on Process Quality: A Multilevel Analysis of Breast Cancer Surgery in France.竞争与医院集中化对医疗过程质量的影响:法国乳腺癌手术的多层次分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):459-469. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.179.
6
It's Still The Prices, Stupid: Why The US Spends So Much On Health Care, And A Tribute To Uwe Reinhardt.还是价格问题:美国医疗保健支出为何如此之高——纪念乌韦·赖因哈特。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jan;38(1):87-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05144.
7
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
8
Sex Differences in Treatments, Relative Survival, and Excess Mortality Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: National Cohort Study Using the SWEDEHEART Registry.急性心肌梗死患者治疗、相对生存率和超额死亡率的性别差异:基于 SWEDEHEART 注册研究的全国队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Dec 14;6(12):e007123. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007123.
9
How much do cancer specialists earn? A comparison of physician fees and remuneration in oncology and radiology in high-income countries.癌症专家的收入是多少?高收入国家肿瘤学和放射学医师费用和薪酬的比较。
Health Policy. 2018 Feb;122(2):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Managing multimorbidity: Profiles of integrated care approaches targeting people with multiple chronic conditions in Europe.管理多重疾病:针对欧洲多种慢性疾病患者的综合护理方法简介。
Health Policy. 2018 Jan;122(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

心力衰竭和糖尿病患者治疗的国内和国际差异。

Within and across country variations in treatment of patients with heart failure and diabetes.

机构信息

Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES), Paris, France.

Department of Economics (LEDa), University Dauphine PSL, Paris, France.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1358-1369. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13854. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13854
PMID:34409601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8579197/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare within-country variation of health care utilization and spending of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and diabetes across countries.

DATA SOURCES

Patient-level linked data sources compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care across nine countries: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States.

DATA COLLECTION METHODS

Patients were identified in routine hospital data with a primary diagnosis of CHF and a secondary diagnosis of diabetes in 2015/2016.

STUDY DESIGN

We calculated the care consumption of patients after a hospital admission over a year across the care pathway-ranging from primary care to home health nursing care. To compare the distribution of care consumption in each country, we use Gini coefficients, Lorenz curves, and female-male ratios for eight utilization and spending measures.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

In all countries, rehabilitation and home nursing care were highly concentrated in the top decile of patients, while the number of drug prescriptions were more uniformly distributed. On average, the Gini coefficient for drug consumption is about 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.36), while it is, 0.50 (0.45-0.56) for primary care visits, and more than 0.75 (0.81-0.92) for rehabilitation use and nurse visits at home (0.78; 0.62-0.9). Variations in spending were more pronounced than in utilization. Compared to men, women spend more days at initial hospital admission (+5%, 1.01-1.06), have a higher number of prescriptions (+7%, 1.05-1.09), and substantially more rehabilitation and home care (+20% to 35%, 0.79-1.6, 0.99-1.64), but have fewer visits to specialists (-10%; 0.84-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Distribution of health care consumption in different settings varies within countries, but there are also some common treatment patterns across all countries. Clinicians and policy makers need to look into these differences in care utilization by sex and care setting to determine whether they are justified or indicate suboptimal care.

摘要

目的

比较 9 个国家(澳大利亚、加拿大、英格兰、法国、德国、新西兰、西班牙、瑞士和美国)中患有慢性心力衰竭(CHF)和糖尿病患者的国内卫生保健利用和支出的差异。

数据来源

患者水平的相关数据来自于 9 个国家的国际协作,数据来源于 2015/2016 年的常规医院数据,患者的主要诊断为 CHF,次要诊断为糖尿病。

数据收集方法

我们计算了每位患者在一年的住院后整个医疗护理路径中的护理消费,包括从初级保健到家庭保健护理。为了比较每个国家的护理消费分布,我们使用基尼系数、洛伦兹曲线和 8 种利用和支出措施的女性-男性比例。

主要发现

在所有国家,康复和家庭护理都高度集中在患者的前十分位,而药物处方的数量分布更为均匀。平均而言,药物消费的基尼系数约为 0.30(95%置信区间(CI):0.27-0.36),而初级保健就诊的基尼系数为 0.50(0.45-0.56),康复和家庭护理的基尼系数超过 0.75(0.81-0.92)(0.78;0.62-0.9)。支出的变化比利用更为明显。与男性相比,女性在初次住院时的住院天数增加了(+5%,1.01-1.06),药物处方增加了(+7%,1.05-1.09),康复和家庭护理的使用显著增加(20%至 35%,0.79-1.6,0.99-1.64),但专科就诊减少(-10%,0.84-0.97)。

结论

不同国家内卫生保健消费的分布存在差异,但所有国家也存在一些共同的治疗模式。临床医生和政策制定者需要研究这些按性别和护理环境划分的护理利用差异,以确定这些差异是否合理,或者是否表明护理不足。