• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极领导与员工敬业度:积极情绪状态与个人主义—集体主义的作用。

Positive leadership and employee engagement: The roles of state positive affect and individualism-collectivism.

作者信息

Yan Yanling, Zhang Junwei, Akhtar Muhammad Naseer, Liang Shichang

机构信息

School of Economics & Management, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.

Guangzhou, People's Republic of China School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology.

出版信息

Curr Psychol. 2023;42(11):9109-9118. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02192-7. Epub 2021 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1007/s12144-021-02192-7
PMID:34413622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8364414/
Abstract

Drawing upon broaden-and-build theory, this study examined the influence of positive leadership on employee engagement through the mediating role of employees' state positive affect and the moderating effect of individualism-collectivism orientation in a Chinese cultural context. A sample of 215 valid questionnaires was obtained through a two-wave survey of 48 teams working in central China. Hypotheses were tested by a method of hierarchical linear modelling. The results indicate that positive leadership promotes employees' state positive affect and engagement. State positive affect partially mediates the association between positive leadership and employee engagement. Moreover, a multilevel moderation analysis reveals that collectivism weakens the effect of positive leadership on employees' state positive affect. Theoretical and managerial implications and future directions are discussed.

摘要

基于拓展与建构理论,本研究在中国文化背景下,考察了积极领导通过员工的积极情绪状态的中介作用以及个人主义—集体主义取向的调节作用对员工敬业度的影响。通过对中国中部地区48个团队进行两阶段调查,获得了215份有效问卷样本。采用分层线性建模方法对假设进行了检验。结果表明,积极领导能够促进员工的积极情绪状态和敬业度。积极情绪状态部分中介了积极领导与员工敬业度之间的关系。此外,多层次调节分析表明,集体主义减弱了积极领导对员工积极情绪状态的影响。文章还讨论了理论和管理意义以及未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/8364414/42c4de004de2/12144_2021_2192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/8364414/88a7c4626477/12144_2021_2192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/8364414/42c4de004de2/12144_2021_2192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/8364414/88a7c4626477/12144_2021_2192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d2e/8364414/42c4de004de2/12144_2021_2192_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Positive leadership and employee engagement: The roles of state positive affect and individualism-collectivism.积极领导与员工敬业度:积极情绪状态与个人主义—集体主义的作用。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(11):9109-9118. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02192-7. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
How Does Internal and External CSR Affect Employees' Work Engagement? Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms and Boundary Conditions.内部和外部企业社会责任如何影响员工的工作投入?探索多种中介机制和边界条件。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 11;16(14):2476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142476.
3
Action Speaks Louder: The Role of Proactive Behavior between Creative Leadership and Employees' Creativity.行动胜于言辞:积极行为在创新领导力与员工创造力之间的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;14(3):257. doi: 10.3390/bs14030257.
4
The impact of middle managers' digital leadership on employee work engagement.中层管理者的数字领导力对员工工作投入度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1368442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1368442. eCollection 2024.
5
Impact of Managerial Trustworthy Behavior on Employee Engagement: Mediating Role of Perceived Insider Status.管理者可信赖行为对员工敬业度的影响:感知内部人身份的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 11;13:942697. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942697. eCollection 2022.
6
The Impact of Empowering Leadership on Employee Improvisation: Roles of Challenge-Hindrance Stress and Psychological Availability.赋能型领导对员工即兴发挥的影响:挑战性-阻碍性压力与心理可及性的作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Sep 26;15:2783-2801. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S381092. eCollection 2022.
7
The effect of team cultural tightness and transformational leadership on employee creative behavior: A cross-level moderated mediation model.团队文化紧密度和变革型领导对员工创造性行为的影响:跨层次的调节中介模型。
Psych J. 2023 Oct;12(5):657-669. doi: 10.1002/pchj.678. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
8
Does inclusive leadership foster employee psychological resilience? The role of perceived insider status and supportive organizational climate.包容性领导会促进员工的心理韧性吗?感知到的内部人身份和支持性组织氛围的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1127780. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127780. eCollection 2023.
9
Electronic communication during nonwork time and withdrawal behavior: An analysis of employee cognition-emotion-behavior framework from Chinese cultural context.非工作时间的电子通讯与退缩行为:基于中国文化背景的员工认知—情感—行为框架分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 27;13:1010197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010197. eCollection 2022.
10
Servant Leadership and Service Performance: A Multilevel Mediation Model.仆人式领导与服务绩效:多层次中介模型
Psychol Rep. 2021 Aug;124(4):1738-1760. doi: 10.1177/0033294120950302. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of family boundary flexibility on employees' work engagement: a study based on person-environment fit theory perspective.家庭边界灵活性对员工工作投入的影响:基于人-环境匹配理论视角的研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 28;14:1185239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185239. eCollection 2023.
2
Work from home: A behavioral model of Indonesian education workers' productivity during Covid-19.居家办公:新冠疫情期间印度尼西亚教育工作者生产力的行为模型
Heliyon. 2023 Mar;9(3):e14082. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14082. Epub 2023 Feb 24.