Suppr超能文献

公共卫生、人工流产与自然流产。

Public health, induced abortion, and spontaneous abortion.

机构信息

Park University Ringgold Standard Institution, Humanities, Parkville, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2021 Nov;35(9):910-915. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12944. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

Abstract

Bruce P. Blackshaw and Daniel Rodger contend that if we assume fetuses are persons, then abortion is a public health crisis that justifies overriding a gestational mother's rights and compelling her to carry the fetus to term, but dawdle addressing greater public health crises like spontaneous abortion and hunger. They draw a distinction between deliberate and indeliberate harm to justify restricting rights in the former, but not the latter; but such distinction fails to justify restricting rights in most public health crises. Furthermore, it fails to justify curtailing abortion rights as unwilling gestational mothers might deliberately induce abortion in self-defense, merely indeliberately harming the fetus.

摘要

布鲁斯·P·布莱克肖和丹尼尔·罗格认为,如果我们假设胎儿是人,那么堕胎就是一场公共健康危机,这就证明可以凌驾于妊娠母亲的权利之上,强迫她将胎儿孕育至足月,但却拖延解决像自然流产和饥饿这样更大的公共健康危机。他们对故意和非故意的伤害进行了区分,以此来证明前者限制权利是合理的,而后者则不然;但这种区分并不能证明在大多数公共健康危机中限制权利是合理的。此外,它也不能证明限制堕胎权利是合理的,因为不愿意成为妊娠母亲的人可能会出于自卫故意堕胎,只是非故意地伤害胎儿。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验