Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, UK.
Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, UK; Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Sep 2;108(9):1780-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
Similarities between parents and offspring arise from nature and nurture. Beyond this simple dichotomy, recent genomic studies have uncovered "genetic nurture" effects, whereby parental genotypes influence offspring outcomes via environmental pathways rather than genetic transmission. Such genetic nurture effects also need to be accounted for to accurately estimate "direct" genetic effects (i.e., genetic effects on a trait originating in the offspring). Empirical studies have indicated that genetic nurture effects are particularly relevant to the intergenerational transmission of risk for child educational outcomes, which are, in turn, associated with major psychological and health milestones throughout the life course. These findings have yet to be systematically appraised across contexts. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify genetic nurture effects on educational outcomes. A total of 12 studies comprising 38,654 distinct parent(s)-offspring pairs or trios from 8 cohorts reported 22 estimates of genetic nurture effects. Genetic nurture effects on offspring's educational outcomes (β = 0.08, 95% CI [0.07, 0.09]) were smaller than direct genetic effects (β = 0.17, 95% CI [0.13, 0.20]). Findings were largely consistent across studies. Genetic nurture effects originating from mothers and fathers were of similar magnitude, highlighting the need for a greater inclusion of fathers in educational research. Genetic nurture effects were largely explained by observed parental education and socioeconomic status, pointing to their role in environmental pathways shaping child educational outcomes. Findings provide consistent evidence that environmentally mediated parental genetic influences contribute to the intergenerational transmission of educational outcomes, in addition to effects due to genetic transmission.
父母和子女之间的相似性既来自于先天因素,也来自于后天培养。除了这种简单的二分法之外,最近的基因组研究还揭示了“遗传教养”效应,即父母的基因型通过环境途径影响后代的结果,而不是通过遗传传递。为了准确估计“直接”遗传效应(即源自后代的特征的遗传效应),也需要考虑到这种遗传教养效应。实证研究表明,遗传教养效应与儿童教育成果的代际传递风险特别相关,而教育成果又与整个生命过程中的主要心理和健康里程碑有关。这些发现尚未在不同背景下进行系统评估。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以量化遗传教养效应对教育成果的影响。共有 12 项研究,包括来自 8 个队列的 38654 对或 3 对不同的父母-子女或祖孙对,报告了 22 个遗传教养效应的估计值。遗传教养效应对后代教育成果的影响(β=0.08,95%CI[0.07,0.09])小于直接遗传效应(β=0.17,95%CI[0.13,0.20])。研究结果在很大程度上是一致的。来自母亲和父亲的遗传教养效应大小相似,这突出表明需要让更多的父亲参与到教育研究中。遗传教养效应在很大程度上可以用观察到的父母教育和社会经济地位来解释,这表明它们在塑造儿童教育成果的环境途径中发挥了作用。研究结果提供了一致的证据,表明环境介导的父母遗传影响除了遗传传递的影响外,还对教育成果的代际传递有贡献。