Ester Manuel, McNeely Margaret L, McDonough Meghan H, Culos-Reed S Nicole
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Canada.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Canada.
Digit Health. 2021 Aug 5;7:20552076211033426. doi: 10.1177/20552076211033426. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Supervised physical activity interventions can improve cancer survivor quality of life. However, they are resource intensive and may not support physical activity maintenance. Therefore, most cancer survivors remain inactive. Electronic health is a promising tool to support physical activity maintenance, yet technology-based physical activity interventions in oncology have shown mixed effectiveness. We surveyed cancer participants in the Alberta Cancer Exercise program to better understand their experience with technology.
Alberta Cancer Exercise participants were invited to complete a survey on technology literacy, usage, and perceived usefulness. Summary statistics were calculated for all variables. Multiple regression examined demographic prediction of technology usage and literacy.
The response rate was 52.6% ( = 627/1191), with 93.3% survey completion ( = 585/627). Respondents were 60.6 ± 11.0 years old, 96.2% Caucasian, and of high socioeconomic status (83.3% with post-secondary education, 65.5% with income >$60,000). While electronic health literacy was low (mean 1.73 ± 0.73/4), computer (87.6%) and smartphone (87.5%) use was widespread, with 94.6% of smartphone users reporting daily use. One in two respondents used mobile applications or wearable trackers for physical activity, which were perceived as useful by >80% of users. Age and income were significant predictors of technology use and literacy.
Technology is part of the lives of cancer survivors who engaged in a physical activity program, with mobile devices perceived as useful to support physical activity. However, the present findings highlight a need to increase electronic health literacy via education and tailoring of digital tools. These survey findings are being used to build our patient-centered, technology-supported physical activity interventions.
有监督的体育活动干预可改善癌症幸存者的生活质量。然而,它们资源密集,且可能无法支持体育活动的维持。因此,大多数癌症幸存者仍缺乏运动。电子健康是支持体育活动维持的一种有前景的工具,但肿瘤学中基于技术的体育活动干预效果参差不齐。我们对艾伯塔省癌症运动项目中的癌症参与者进行了调查,以更好地了解他们使用技术的体验。
邀请艾伯塔省癌症运动项目的参与者完成一项关于技术素养、使用情况和感知有用性的调查。计算所有变量的汇总统计数据。多元回归分析人口统计学因素对技术使用和素养的预测作用。
回复率为52.6%(n = 627/1191),调查完成率为93.3%(n = 585/627)。受访者年龄为60.6±11.0岁,96.2%为白种人,社会经济地位较高(83.3%拥有高等教育学历,65.5%收入超过60,000美元)。虽然电子健康素养较低(平均1.73±0.73/4),但计算机(87.6%)和智能手机(87.5%)的使用很普遍,94.6%的智能手机用户报告每天使用。二分之一的受访者使用移动应用程序或可穿戴追踪器进行体育活动,超过80%的用户认为它们很有用。年龄和收入是技术使用和素养的重要预测因素。
技术是参与体育活动项目的癌症幸存者生活的一部分,移动设备被认为对支持体育活动有用。然而,目前的研究结果凸显了通过教育和定制数字工具来提高电子健康素养的必要性。这些调查结果正被用于构建我们以患者为中心、技术支持的体育活动干预措施。