Rockefeller Foundation-Boston University 3-D Commission on Determinants, Data, and Decision-making, Boston, USA.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK.
J Urban Health. 2021 Aug;98(Suppl 1):60-68. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00561-y. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) represent a significant global public health burden. As more countries experience both epidemiologic transition and increasing urbanization, it is clear that we need approaches to mitigate the growing burden of NCDs. Large and growing urban environments play an important role in shaping risk factors that influence NCDs, pointing to the ineluctable need to engage sectors beyond the health sector in these settings if we are to improve health. By way of one example, the transportation sector plays a critical role in building and sustaining health outcomes in urban environments in general and in megacities in particular. We conducted a qualitative comparative case study design. We compared Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) policies in 3 megacities-Lagos (Africa), Bogotá (South America), and Beijing (Asia). We examined the extent to which data on the social determinants of health, equity considerations, and multisectoral approaches were incorporated into local politics and the decision-making processes surrounding BRT. We found that all three megacities paid inadequate attention to health in their agenda-setting, despite having considerable healthy transportation policies in principle. BRT system policies have the opportunity to improve lifestyle choices for NCDs through a focus on safe, affordable, and effective forms of transportation. There are opportunities to improve decision-making for health by involving more available data for health, building on existing infrastructures, building stronger political leadership and commitments, and establishing formal frameworks to improve multisectoral collaborations within megacities. Future research will benefit from addressing the political and bureaucratic processes of using health data when designing public transportation services, the political and social obstacles involved, and the cross-national lessons that can be learned from other megacities.
非传染性疾病(NCDs)是全球重大的公共卫生负担。随着越来越多的国家经历着流行病学转变和城市化进程的加快,显然我们需要采取措施来减轻 NCD 不断增加的负担。庞大且不断发展的城市环境在塑造影响 NCD 的风险因素方面发挥着重要作用,这表明,如果我们要改善健康,就必须让卫生部门以外的部门参与到这些环境中。以交通部门为例,它在塑造城市环境(尤其是特大城市)的健康结果方面发挥着关键作用。我们采用了定性比较案例研究设计。我们比较了三个特大城市(非洲的拉各斯、南美洲的波哥大以及亚洲的北京)的快速公交(BRT)政策。我们考察了这些城市将社会决定因素、公平考虑因素和多部门方法纳入地方政治以及 BRT 决策过程的程度。我们发现,尽管这些城市在原则上都有相当多的健康交通政策,但在制定议程时,都没有充分关注健康问题。BRT 系统政策有机会通过关注安全、经济实惠和有效的交通方式来改善 NCD 的生活方式选择。可以通过更多地利用健康数据来改善决策,利用现有基础设施,建立更强大的政治领导和承诺,以及建立正式框架来改善特大城市内部的多部门合作,从而为健康做出决策。未来的研究将受益于解决在设计公共交通服务时使用健康数据的政治和官僚程序、涉及的政治和社会障碍,以及从其他特大城市吸取的跨国家经验教训。