Suppr超能文献

城市交通政策作为一种人口健康干预措施:评估渥太华市交通总体规划对糖尿病发病率的影响。

Municipal transportation policy as a population health intervention: estimating the impact of the City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan on diabetes incidence.

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

Public Health Medicine Unit, Ottawa Public Health, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):285-293. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0168-9. Epub 2019 Jan 9.

Abstract

INTERVENTION

Physical inactivity is an important behavioral risk factor for chronic disease in Canada. Individual-level strategies are used in clinical medicine to target individuals for preventive intervention based on one or more risk factors. In contrast, this study examines the impact of a population-level intervention: a municipal policy outside the healthcare sector that influences the built and social environment.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the preventive effect of a municipal transportation policy to increase active transportation on a chronic disease outcome measure-diabetes incidence-when it is viewed as a population-level health intervention to increase physical activity?

METHODS

The impact of increases in active transportation for regular commuting to work in the city of Ottawa, Ontario was modeled to estimate number of diabetes cases prevented over 10 years. As a health-sector comparison, the reduction in incidence was equated to an individual-level approach to prevention targeting those who are inactive, meant to represent a clinical preventive intervention.

RESULTS

The population-level policy shift could prevent as many as 1620 incident cases of diabetes over 10 years, the largest number prevented by increases in public transit use. This population effect was equal to 17,300 inactive individuals or 12,300 inactive individuals > 45 years old undertaking a clinical preventive intervention to increase physical activity.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate why public health matters today as population-level interventions that exist as policies outside the healthcare sector, supported by public health, may have an unrecognized and therefore underappreciated impact on population health.

摘要

干预措施

身体活动不足是加拿大慢性病的一个重要行为风险因素。在临床医学中,个体层面的策略被用于针对个体进行预防干预,依据是一个或多个风险因素。相比之下,本研究考察了人群层面干预措施的影响:一个医疗保健部门以外的市级政策,影响着建筑和社会环境。

研究问题

当将增加身体活动视为一项增加人群健康的干预措施,来提高公共交通出行以增加体力活动时,市级交通政策对慢性病(糖尿病)发病率的预防效果如何?

方法

对安大略省渥太华市增加日常上班的体力活动交通出行的影响进行建模,以估计 10 年内预防多少例糖尿病。作为卫生部门的比较,将发病率的降低等同于针对不活跃人群的个体层面预防方法,旨在代表临床预防干预。

结果

这种人群层面的政策转变可能会在 10 年内预防多达 1620 例糖尿病新发病例,其中通过增加公共交通使用预防的病例最多。这种人群效应相当于 17300 名不活跃的个体,或 12300 名年龄超过 45 岁的不活跃个体接受临床预防干预来增加体力活动。

结论

结果表明,为什么公共卫生在今天很重要,因为作为医疗保健部门以外的政策存在的人群层面干预措施,得到公共卫生的支持,可能对人群健康产生未被认识到的、因此被低估的影响。

相似文献

2
Healthy Toronto by Design: Promoting a healthier built environment.
Can J Public Health. 2014 Jul 8;106(1 Suppl 1):eS5-8. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.3855.
3
Identifying mechanisms for facilitating knowledge to action strategies targeting the built environment.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3954-4.
5
Driven to Support: Individual- and County-Level Factors Associated With Public Support for Active Transportation Policies.
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):657-666. doi: 10.1177/0890117117738758. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
6
Network influences on the development and implementation of active transportation policies in six U.S. cities.
Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Municipal Officials' Participation in Built Environment Policy Development in the United States.
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(1):42-9. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.131021-QUAN-536. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
8
Transforming Our Cities: Best Practices Towards Clean Air and Active Transportation.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Mar;6(1):22-37. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-0228-1.
10
Can Walking or Biking to Work Really Make a Difference? Compact Development, Observed Commuter Choice and Body Mass Index.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0130903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130903. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Transportation-related Environmental Mixtures and Diabetes Prevalence and Control in Urban/Metropolitan Counties in the United States.
J Endocr Soc. 2023 May 15;7(6):bvad062. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad062. eCollection 2023 May 5.
4
Public health for the hunter-gatherer in us all.
Can J Public Health. 2020 Oct;111(5):701-704. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00341-2. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
5
Public health matters-but we need to make the case.
Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):264-269. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00218-z. Epub 2019 May 28.
6
Diabetes and the Built Environment: Evidence and Policies.
Curr Diab Rep. 2019 May 21;19(7):35. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1162-1.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Beyond health care: the other determinants of health.
CMAJ. 2017 Dec 18;189(50):E1571. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171419.
3
Estimating the health benefits of planned public transit investments in Montreal.
Environ Res. 2018 Jan;160:412-419. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
Contrasts in active transport behaviour across four countries: how do they translate into public health benefits?
Prev Med. 2015 May;74:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
7
Health cobenefits and transportation-related reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco Bay area.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):703-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300939. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
8
Physical activity associated with public transport use--a review and modelling of potential benefits.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Jul;9(7):2454-78. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9072454. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
9
The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health.
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):294-305. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8.
10
Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe.
Obes Rev. 2012 Aug;13(8):659-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00982.x. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验