• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市交通政策作为一种人口健康干预措施:评估渥太华市交通总体规划对糖尿病发病率的影响。

Municipal transportation policy as a population health intervention: estimating the impact of the City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan on diabetes incidence.

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

Public Health Medicine Unit, Ottawa Public Health, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):285-293. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0168-9. Epub 2019 Jan 9.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-018-0168-9
PMID:30628043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6964411/
Abstract

INTERVENTION

Physical inactivity is an important behavioral risk factor for chronic disease in Canada. Individual-level strategies are used in clinical medicine to target individuals for preventive intervention based on one or more risk factors. In contrast, this study examines the impact of a population-level intervention: a municipal policy outside the healthcare sector that influences the built and social environment.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the preventive effect of a municipal transportation policy to increase active transportation on a chronic disease outcome measure-diabetes incidence-when it is viewed as a population-level health intervention to increase physical activity?

METHODS

The impact of increases in active transportation for regular commuting to work in the city of Ottawa, Ontario was modeled to estimate number of diabetes cases prevented over 10 years. As a health-sector comparison, the reduction in incidence was equated to an individual-level approach to prevention targeting those who are inactive, meant to represent a clinical preventive intervention.

RESULTS

The population-level policy shift could prevent as many as 1620 incident cases of diabetes over 10 years, the largest number prevented by increases in public transit use. This population effect was equal to 17,300 inactive individuals or 12,300 inactive individuals > 45 years old undertaking a clinical preventive intervention to increase physical activity.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate why public health matters today as population-level interventions that exist as policies outside the healthcare sector, supported by public health, may have an unrecognized and therefore underappreciated impact on population health.

摘要

干预措施

身体活动不足是加拿大慢性病的一个重要行为风险因素。在临床医学中,个体层面的策略被用于针对个体进行预防干预,依据是一个或多个风险因素。相比之下,本研究考察了人群层面干预措施的影响:一个医疗保健部门以外的市级政策,影响着建筑和社会环境。

研究问题

当将增加身体活动视为一项增加人群健康的干预措施,来提高公共交通出行以增加体力活动时,市级交通政策对慢性病(糖尿病)发病率的预防效果如何?

方法

对安大略省渥太华市增加日常上班的体力活动交通出行的影响进行建模,以估计 10 年内预防多少例糖尿病。作为卫生部门的比较,将发病率的降低等同于针对不活跃人群的个体层面预防方法,旨在代表临床预防干预。

结果

这种人群层面的政策转变可能会在 10 年内预防多达 1620 例糖尿病新发病例,其中通过增加公共交通使用预防的病例最多。这种人群效应相当于 17300 名不活跃的个体,或 12300 名年龄超过 45 岁的不活跃个体接受临床预防干预来增加体力活动。

结论

结果表明,为什么公共卫生在今天很重要,因为作为医疗保健部门以外的政策存在的人群层面干预措施,得到公共卫生的支持,可能对人群健康产生未被认识到的、因此被低估的影响。

相似文献

1
Municipal transportation policy as a population health intervention: estimating the impact of the City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan on diabetes incidence.城市交通政策作为一种人口健康干预措施:评估渥太华市交通总体规划对糖尿病发病率的影响。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):285-293. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0168-9. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
2
Healthy Toronto by Design: Promoting a healthier built environment.《多伦多健康设计:促进更健康的建筑环境》
Can J Public Health. 2014 Jul 8;106(1 Suppl 1):eS5-8. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.3855.
3
Identifying mechanisms for facilitating knowledge to action strategies targeting the built environment.确定促进针对建成环境的知识转化为行动策略的机制。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3954-4.
4
Multilevel Analysis of Municipal Officials' Participation in Land Use Policies Supportive of Active Living: City and Individual Factors.市级官员参与支持积极生活的土地使用政策的多层次分析:城市和个人因素
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Mar;30(4):287-90. doi: 10.1177/0890117116639571.
5
Driven to Support: Individual- and County-Level Factors Associated With Public Support for Active Transportation Policies.受到推动以提供支持:与公众对积极交通政策的支持相关的个人和县级因素。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):657-666. doi: 10.1177/0890117117738758. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
6
Network influences on the development and implementation of active transportation policies in six U.S. cities.网络对美国六个城市积极交通政策的制定和实施的影响。
Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Municipal Officials' Participation in Built Environment Policy Development in the United States.美国市政官员对建成环境政策制定的参与
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(1):42-9. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.131021-QUAN-536. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
8
Transforming Our Cities: Best Practices Towards Clean Air and Active Transportation.转变我们的城市:实现清洁空气和积极交通的最佳实践。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Mar;6(1):22-37. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-0228-1.
9
Forecasting Diabetes Cases Prevented and Cost Savings Associated with Population Increases of Walking in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, Canada.预测加拿大大多伦多和汉密尔顿地区因增加步行人口而预防的糖尿病病例数和节省的成本。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 31;18(15):8127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158127.
10
Can Walking or Biking to Work Really Make a Difference? Compact Development, Observed Commuter Choice and Body Mass Index.步行或骑自行车上班真的会有不同吗?紧凑型发展、观察到的通勤选择与身体质量指数。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0130903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130903. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Transportation-related Environmental Mixtures and Diabetes Prevalence and Control in Urban/Metropolitan Counties in the United States.美国城市/大都市县中与交通相关的环境混合物及糖尿病患病率与控制情况
J Endocr Soc. 2023 May 15;7(6):bvad062. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad062. eCollection 2023 May 5.
2
Improving Decision-Making for Population Health in Nonhealth Sectors in Urban Environments: the Example of the Transportation Sector in Three Megacities-the 3-D Commission.改善城市环境中非卫生部门的人口健康决策:以三个特大城市的交通部门为例——3-D 委员会。
J Urban Health. 2021 Aug;98(Suppl 1):60-68. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00561-y. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
Forecasting Diabetes Cases Prevented and Cost Savings Associated with Population Increases of Walking in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, Canada.预测加拿大大多伦多和汉密尔顿地区因增加步行人口而预防的糖尿病病例数和节省的成本。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 31;18(15):8127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158127.
4
Public health for the hunter-gatherer in us all.全民共享狩猎采集者的公共卫生成果。
Can J Public Health. 2020 Oct;111(5):701-704. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00341-2. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
5
Public health matters-but we need to make the case.公共卫生至关重要——但我们需要阐明这一点。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):264-269. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00218-z. Epub 2019 May 28.
6
Diabetes and the Built Environment: Evidence and Policies.糖尿病与建筑环境:证据与政策。
Curr Diab Rep. 2019 May 21;19(7):35. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1162-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants.全球 2001 年至 2016 年身体活动不足趋势分析:基于 358 项以人群为基础的调查的汇总分析,涉及 190 万参与者。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
2
Beyond health care: the other determinants of health.超越医疗保健:健康的其他决定因素。
CMAJ. 2017 Dec 18;189(50):E1571. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171419.
3
Estimating the health benefits of planned public transit investments in Montreal.估算蒙特利尔规划公共交通投资的健康效益。
Environ Res. 2018 Jan;160:412-419. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
4
Measuring Burden of Unhealthy Behaviours Using a Multivariable Predictive Approach: Life Expectancy Lost in Canada Attributable to Smoking, Alcohol, Physical Inactivity, and Diet.使用多变量预测方法衡量不健康行为的负担:加拿大因吸烟、饮酒、缺乏身体活动和饮食导致的预期寿命损失
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 16;13(8):e1002082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002082. eCollection 2016 Aug.
5
Healthy Canada by Design CLASP: Lessons learned from the first phase of an intersectoral, cross-provincial, built environment initiative.加拿大健康设计CLASP:从一个跨部门、跨省的建筑环境倡议第一阶段汲取的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Sep 12;106(1 Suppl 1):eS50-63. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4555.
6
Contrasts in active transport behaviour across four countries: how do they translate into public health benefits?四个国家主动运输行为的对比:它们如何转化为公共卫生效益?
Prev Med. 2015 May;74:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
7
Health cobenefits and transportation-related reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco Bay area.旧金山湾区的健康协同效益和与交通相关的温室气体减排。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):703-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300939. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
8
Physical activity associated with public transport use--a review and modelling of potential benefits.与公共交通使用相关的身体活动——潜在效益的回顾与建模。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Jul;9(7):2454-78. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9072454. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
9
The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health.体力活动不足的流行:全球促进公共健康行动。
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):294-305. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8.
10
Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe.时间利用和身体活动:全球范围内运动减少的趋势。
Obes Rev. 2012 Aug;13(8):659-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00982.x. Epub 2012 Jun 14.